These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27884175)

  • 21. New ways of insulin delivery.
    Heinemann L
    Int J Clin Pract Suppl; 2011 Feb; (170):31-46. PubMed ID: 21323811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of national guidelines for network meta-analysis.
    Laws A; Kendall R; Hawkins N
    Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):642-54. PubMed ID: 25128059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Factors associated with failure to publish large randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting.
    Krzyzanowska MK; Pintilie M; Tannock IF
    JAMA; 2003 Jul; 290(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 12876092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Review articles and publication bias.
    Kleijnen J; Knipschild P
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1992 May; 42(5):587-91. PubMed ID: 1388359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Industry Sponsor Influence in Clinical Trial Reporting in Canada: A Qualitative Interview Study.
    Morrow RL; Mintzes B; Gray G; Law MR; Garrison S; Dormuth CR
    Clin Ther; 2022 Mar; 44(3):374-388. PubMed ID: 34955232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Research results should be freely accessible!-- Case reports demonstrate obstacles to contact with drug industry].
    Eliasson M; Bergqvist D
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Sep; 98(37):3913-6. PubMed ID: 11586830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Publication bias in medical informatics evaluation research: is it an issue or not?
    Machan C; Ammenwerth E; Bodner T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():957-62. PubMed ID: 17108634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Authors' Submission Toolkit: a practical guide to getting your research published.
    Chipperfield L; Citrome L; Clark J; David FS; Enck R; Evangelista M; Gonzalez J; Groves T; Magrann J; Mansi B; Miller C; Mooney LA; Murphy A; Shelton J; Walson PD; Weigel A
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Aug; 26(8):1967-82. PubMed ID: 20569069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.
    Tong EK; England L; Glantz SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):e356-66. PubMed ID: 15741361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Companies' Health Technology Assessment Strategies and Practices in Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy and Spain: An Industry Metrics Study.
    Wang T; McAuslane N; Liberti L; Gardarsdottir H; Goettsch W; Leufkens H
    Front Pharmacol; 2020; 11():594549. PubMed ID: 33390978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Publication bias in psychological science: comment on Ferguson and Brannick (2012).
    Rothstein HR; Bushman BJ
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 22369520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prevalence of Publication Bias Tests in Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
    Chow JC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 61(12):3055-3063. PubMed ID: 30458500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Incorporating single-arm evidence into a network meta-analysis using aggregate level matching: Assessing the impact.
    Leahy J; Thom H; Jansen JP; Gray E; O'Leary A; White A; Walsh C
    Stat Med; 2019 Jun; 38(14):2505-2523. PubMed ID: 30895655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Selection and evaluation of empirical research in technology assessment.
    Chalmers TC; Hewett P; Reitman D; Sacks HS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1989; 5(4):521-36. PubMed ID: 2699469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lack of transparency of clinical trials on endometriosis.
    Guo SW; Evers JLH
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 121(6):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 23812463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials: how to improve their quality?
    Pignon JP; Arriagada R
    Lung Cancer; 1994 Mar; 10 Suppl 1():S135-41. PubMed ID: 8087502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences.
    Thornton A; Lee P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 53(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 10729693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Publication rate for funded studies from a major UK health research funder: a cohort study.
    Turner S; Wright D; Maeso R; Cook A; Milne R
    BMJ Open; 2013 May; 3(5):. PubMed ID: 23645914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.