These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27884175)

  • 41. Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences.
    Thornton A; Lee P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 53(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 10729693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Publication rate for funded studies from a major UK health research funder: a cohort study.
    Turner S; Wright D; Maeso R; Cook A; Milne R
    BMJ Open; 2013 May; 3(5):. PubMed ID: 23645914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Deficiencies in addressing effect modification in network meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological survey.
    Kovic B; Zoratti MJ; Michalopoulos S; Silvestre C; Thorlund K; Thabane L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():47-56. PubMed ID: 28603010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. On the reproducibility of meta-analyses: six practical recommendations.
    Lakens D; Hilgard J; Staaks J
    BMC Psychol; 2016 May; 4(1):24. PubMed ID: 27241618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Publication bias in recent meta-analyses.
    Kicinski M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e81823. PubMed ID: 24363797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A Comparison of National Guidelines for Network Meta-Analysis.
    Laws A; Tao R; Wang S; Padhiar A; Goring S
    Value Health; 2019 Oct; 22(10):1178-1186. PubMed ID: 31563261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Challenges and Opportunities for Companies to Build HTA/Payer Perspectives Into Drug Development Through the Use of a Dynamic Target Product Profile.
    Wang T; McAuslane N; Goettsch WG; Leufkens HGM; De Bruin ML
    Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():948161. PubMed ID: 35924050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Significance of Alliance Networks in Research and Development of Digital Health Products for Diabetes: Observational Study.
    Kikuchi S; Kodama K; Sengoku S
    JMIR Diabetes; 2021 Oct; 6(4):e32446. PubMed ID: 34673525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A historical review of publication bias.
    Marks-Anglin A; Chen Y
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):725-742. PubMed ID: 32893970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Value of Scientific Publications in Surgical Device Innovation.
    Song A; Rensi SE; Tarquinio AG; Cahan E; de Ruijter VE; Wall JK
    Surg Innov; 2023 Oct; 30(5):615-621. PubMed ID: 36511818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Publication bias in clinical trials of electronic health records.
    Vawdrey DK; Hripcsak G
    J Biomed Inform; 2013 Feb; 46(1):139-41. PubMed ID: 22975314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
    Rothwell PM; Robertson G
    Lancet; 1997 Oct; 350(9085):1181-2. PubMed ID: 9343536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
    Davey Smith G; Egger M
    Lancet; 1997 Oct; 350(9085):1182. PubMed ID: 9343537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Risk of Publication Bias in Therapeutic Interventions for COVID-19Risco de viés de publicação em intervenções terapêuticas para a COVID-19].
    Hasdeu S; Tortosa F
    Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2021; 45():e157. PubMed ID: 34934418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The role of meta-analysis in the regulatory process for foods, drugs, and devices.
    Berlin JA; Colditz GA
    JAMA; 1999 Mar; 281(9):830-4. PubMed ID: 10071005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. From science to practice. Meta-analyses using individual patient data are needed.
    Oxman AD; Clarke MJ; Stewart LA
    JAMA; 1995 Sep; 274(10):845-6. PubMed ID: 7650811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Publication bias.
    Parmley WW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Nov; 24(5):1424-5. PubMed ID: 7930269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Duplicate publication of articles used in meta-analysis in Korea.
    Choi WS; Song SW; Ock SM; Kim CM; Lee J; Chang WJ; Kim SH
    Springerplus; 2014; 3():182. PubMed ID: 24808996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Why most published meta-analysis findings are false.
    Doleman B; Williams JP; Lund J
    Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Sep; 23(9):925-928. PubMed ID: 31240417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Innovation in Chinese internet companies: A meta-frontier analysis.
    Hafeez S; Arshad NI; Rahim LBAB; Shabbir MF; Iqbal J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233278. PubMed ID: 32437383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.