484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27884464)
1. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.
Pan X; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 1997 May; 4(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 9156236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.
Hillis SL
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2031-57. PubMed ID: 26608405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using the mean-to-sigma ratio as a measure of the improperness of binormal ROC curves.
Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 21232682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves.
Pesce LL; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):814-29. PubMed ID: 17574132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Limitations to the robustness of binormal ROC curves: effects of model misspecification and location of decision thresholds on bias, precision, size and power.
Walsh SJ
Stat Med; 1997 Mar; 16(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 9131755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the use of partial area under the ROC curve for comparison of two diagnostic tests.
Ma H; Bandos AI; Gur D
Biom J; 2015 Mar; 57(2):304-20. PubMed ID: 25537143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches to ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
Hajian-Tilaki KO; Hanley JA; Joseph L; Collet JP
Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 8994156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of two priors on Bayesian estimation of "Proper" binormal ROC curves from common and degenerate datasets.
Zur RM; Pesce LL; Jiang Y
Acad Radiol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):969-79. PubMed ID: 20605491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
Hanley JA
Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1575-85. PubMed ID: 8855483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation.
Metz CE; Pan X
J Math Psychol; 1999 Mar; 43(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 10069933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Constructing "proper" ROCs from ordinal response data using weighted power functions.
Mossman D; Peng H
Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):523-35. PubMed ID: 24029820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ROC Curve for Extremely Subtle Lung Nodules on Chest Radiographs Confirmed by CT Scan.
Shang H; Jiang Y; Li F; MacMahon H; Wang J
Acad Radiol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 26774737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semiparametric estimation of the relationship between ROC operating points and the test-result scale: application to the proper binormal model.
Pesce LL; Horsch K; Drukker K; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1537-48. PubMed ID: 22055797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part III. Initial evaluation with detection ROC data.
Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):438-47. PubMed ID: 10845403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical meaning of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve for the evaluation of the performance of disease markers.
Parodi S; Verda D; Bagnasco F; Muselli M
Epidemiol Health; 2022; 44():e2022088. PubMed ID: 36265519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
