These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27884492)

  • 21. How optimal caseload midwifery can modify predictors for preterm birth in young women: Integrated findings from a mixed methods study.
    Allen J; Kildea S; Stapleton H
    Midwifery; 2016 Oct; 41():30-38. PubMed ID: 27498186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Women's experiences of exercising informed choices as expressed through their sense of self and relationships with others in Ireland: A participatory action research study.
    O'Brien D; Casey M; Butler MM
    Midwifery; 2018 Oct; 65():58-66. PubMed ID: 30118977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Normalising birth for women with a disability: the challenges facing practitioners.
    Walsh-Gallagher D; Mc Conkey R; Sinclair M; Clarke R
    Midwifery; 2013 Apr; 29(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 23375750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Socially disadvantaged women's views of barriers to feeling safe to engage in decision-making in maternity care.
    Ebert L; Bellchambers H; Ferguson A; Browne J
    Women Birth; 2014 Jun; 27(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 24355713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The choice of obstetric care by low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands: implications for policy and management.
    Pavlova M; Hendrix M; Nouwens E; Nijhuis J; van Merode G
    Health Policy; 2009 Nov; 93(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 19540012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gaining insight into how women conceptualize satisfaction: Western Australian women's perception of their maternity care experiences.
    Lewis L; Hauck YL; Ronchi F; Crichton C; Waller L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():29. PubMed ID: 26846257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008.
    Stoll K; Kornelsen J
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 24588878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Trading patients' choice in providers for quality of maternity care? A discrete choice experiment amongst pregnant women.
    Lambooij MS; Veldwijk J; van Gils PF; Suijkerbuijk AWM; Struijs JN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232098. PubMed ID: 32330182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. 'Not enough people to look after you': an exploration of women's experiences of childbirth in the Republic of Ireland.
    Larkin P; Begley CM; Devane D
    Midwifery; 2012 Feb; 28(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 21237541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Increasing possibilities - Increasing dilemmas: A qualitative study of Swedish midwives' experiences of ultrasound use in pregnancy.
    Edvardsson K; Lalos A; Åhman A; Small R; Graner Md PhD S; Mogren I
    Midwifery; 2016 Nov; 42():46-53. PubMed ID: 27788415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does model of maternity care make a difference to birth outcomes for young women? A retrospective cohort study.
    Allen J; Gibbons K; Beckmann M; Tracy M; Stapleton H; Kildea S
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2015 Aug; 52(8):1332-42. PubMed ID: 25952336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Critiquing the evolution of maternity care preferences research: A systematic mixed studies review.
    Bull C; Creedy DK; Gamble J; Toohill J; Karger S; Callander EJ
    Midwifery; 2022 Aug; 111():103386. PubMed ID: 35660773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Western Australian women's perceptions of the style and quality of midwifery postnatal care in hospital and at home.
    Fenwick J; Butt J; Dhaliwal S; Hauck Y; Schmied V
    Women Birth; 2010 Mar; 23(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 19632912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Women's views on partnership working with midwives during pregnancy and childbirth.
    Boyle S; Thomas H; Brooks F
    Midwifery; 2016 Jan; 32():21-9. PubMed ID: 26597110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Midwife-led maternity services and consumer 'choice' in an Australian metropolitan region.
    Zadoroznyj M
    Midwifery; 2000 Sep; 16(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 10970751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Why freebirth in a maternity system with free midwifery care? A qualitative study of Danish women's motivations and preparations for freebirth.
    Lou S; Dahlen HG; Gefke Hansen S; Ørneborg Rodkjær L; Maimburg RD
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2022 Dec; 34():100789. PubMed ID: 36332498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preferences for a third-trimester ultrasound scan in a low-risk obstetric population: a discrete choice experiment.
    Lynn FA; Crealey GE; Alderdice FA; McElnay JC
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):892-903. PubMed ID: 23527851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CATCH: development of a home-based midwifery intervention to support young pregnant smokers to quit.
    Bryce A; Butler C; Gnich W; Sheehy C; Tappin DM
    Midwifery; 2009 Oct; 25(5):473-82. PubMed ID: 18280015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A non-randomised trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of Midwifery Group Practice compared with standard maternity care arrangements in one Australian hospital.
    Toohill J; Turkstra E; Gamble J; Scuffham PA
    Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e874-9. PubMed ID: 22172743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 'What women want': Using image theory to develop expectations of maternity care framework.
    Clark K; Beatty S; Reibel T
    Midwifery; 2015 May; 31(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 25631551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.