These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27884861)

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy of the Ottawa Ankle and Midfoot Rules: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Beckenkamp PR; Lin CC; Macaskill P; Michaleff ZA; Maher CG; Moseley AM
    Br J Sports Med; 2017 Mar; 51(6):504-510. PubMed ID: 27884861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Decision Rules to Exclude Fractures in Acute Ankle Injuries: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Barelds I; Krijnen WP; van de Leur JP; van der Schans CP; Goddard RJ
    J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 53(3):353-368. PubMed ID: 28764972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of Ottawa Ankle Rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and midfoot in children: a meta-analysis.
    Dowling S; Spooner CH; Liang Y; Dryden DM; Friesen C; Klassen TP; Wright RB
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 16(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 19187397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review.
    Bachmann LM; Kolb E; Koller MT; Steurer J; ter Riet G
    BMJ; 2003 Feb; 326(7386):417. PubMed ID: 12595378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment.
    Pigman EC; Klug RK; Sanford S; Jolly BT
    Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jul; 24(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7912053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity of the Ottawa rules.
    Lucchesi GM; Jackson RE; Peacock WF; Cerasani C; Swor RA
    Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7793707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy of the Ottawa ankle rule to exclude fractures in acute ankle injuries in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gomes YE; Chau M; Banwell HA; Causby RS
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Sep; 23(1):885. PubMed ID: 36151550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules for Acute Foot and Ankle Injuries.
    David S; Gray K; Russell JA; Starkey C
    J Sport Rehabil; 2016 Feb; 25(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 26262468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Bernese ankle rules: a fast, reliable test after low-energy, supination-type malleolar and midfoot trauma.
    Eggli S; Sclabas GM; Eggli S; Zimmermann H; Exadaktylos AK
    J Trauma; 2005 Nov; 59(5):1268-71. PubMed ID: 16385314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A pooled analysis of the Ottawa ankle rules used on adults in the ED.
    Markert RJ; Walley ME; Guttman TG; Mehta R
    Am J Emerg Med; 1998 Oct; 16(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 9786538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can clinical prediction rules used in acute pediatric ankle and midfoot injuries be applied to an adult population?
    Smith KR; Brown CK; Brewer KL
    Am J Emerg Med; 2011 May; 29(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 21450433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of emergency nurses' use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules to initiate radiographic tests on improving healthcare outcomes for patients with ankle injuries: A systematic review.
    Ho JK; Chau JP; Cheung NM
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2016 Nov; 63():37-47. PubMed ID: 27592083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective study of modified Ottawa ankle rules in a military population. Interobserver agreement between physical therapists and orthopaedic surgeons.
    Springer BA; Arciero RA; Tenuta JJ; Taylor DC
    Am J Sports Med; 2000; 28(6):864-8. PubMed ID: 11101110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic management strategies for adults and children with minor head injury: a systematic review and an economic evaluation.
    Pandor A; Goodacre S; Harnan S; Holmes M; Pickering A; Fitzgerald P; Rees A; Stevenson M
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Aug; 15(27):1-202. PubMed ID: 21806873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a university sports medicine center. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures.
    Leddy JJ; Smolinski RJ; Lawrence J; Snyder JL; Priore RL
    Am J Sports Med; 1998; 26(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 9548106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in children.
    Libetta C; Burke D; Brennan P; Yassa J
    J Accid Emerg Med; 1999 Sep; 16(5):342-4. PubMed ID: 10505914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Application of the Ottawa ankle rules in the ankle and midfoot injuries: verification of the method on the basis of own material].
    Szczesny G; Sypniewski M; Deszczyński J
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 1999; 64(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 10575796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.
    Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Nair RC; McDowell I; Reardon M; Stewart JP; Maloney J
    JAMA; 1993 Mar; 269(9):1127-32. PubMed ID: 8433468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Australia.
    Broomhead A; Stuart P
    Emerg Med (Fremantle); 2003 Apr; 15(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 12675622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.
    Glas AS; Pijnenburg BA; Lijmer JG; Bogaard K; de RM; Keeman JN; Butzelaar RM; Bossuyt PM
    CMAJ; 2002 Mar; 166(6):727-33. PubMed ID: 11944759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.