BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27885679)

  • 1. Clinical auditing as an instrument for quality improvement in breast cancer care in the Netherlands: The national NABON Breast Cancer Audit.
    van Bommel AC; Spronk PE; Vrancken Peeters MT; Jager A; Lobbes M; Maduro JH; Mureau MA; Schreuder K; Smorenburg CH; Verloop J; Westenend PJ; Wouters MW; Siesling S; Tjan-Heijnen VC; van Dalen T;
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 115(3):243-249. PubMed ID: 27885679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancing the quality of care for patients with breast cancer: seven years of experience with a Dutch auditing system.
    Veerbeek L; van der Geest L; Wouters M; Guicherit O; Does-den Heijer A; Nortier J; Marinelli A; Tollenaar R; Struikmans H
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 37(8):714-8. PubMed ID: 21458947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospital organizational factors affect the use of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer in the Netherlands.
    Schreuder K; van Bommel ACM; de Ligt KM; Maduro JH; Vrancken Peeters MTFD; Mureau MAM; Siesling S
    Breast; 2017 Aug; 34():96-102. PubMed ID: 28552797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Large variation between hospitals in immediate breast reconstruction rates after mastectomy for breast cancer in the Netherlands.
    van Bommel AC; Mureau MA; Schreuder K; van Dalen T; Vrancken Peeters MT; Schrieks M; Maduro JH; Siesling S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Feb; 70(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 27993547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The quality indicator 'tumour positive surgical margin following breast-conserving surgery' does not provide transparent insight into care].
    Gooiker GA; Veerbeek L; van der Geest LG; Stijnen T; Dekker JW; Nortier JW; Marinelli AW; Struikmans H; Wouters MW; Tollenaar RA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A1142. PubMed ID: 20482902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immediate Breast Reconstruction in The Netherlands and the United States: A Proof-of-Concept to Internationally Compare Quality of Care Using Cancer Registry Data.
    Kamali P; van Bommel A; Becherer B; Cooter R; Mureau MAM; Pusic A; Siesling S; van der Hulst RRJW; Lin SJ; Rakhorst H
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Oct; 144(4):565e-574e. PubMed ID: 31568284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation in use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III breast cancer: Results of the Dutch national breast cancer audit.
    Spronk PER; van Bommel ACM; Siesling S; Wouters MWJM; Vrancken Peeters MTFD; Smorenburg CH
    Breast; 2017 Dec; 36():34-38. PubMed ID: 28942098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the volume of ductal carcinoma in situ impact the positive margin rate in patients undergoing breast conservation for invasive breast cancer?
    Martin-Dunlap TM; Cyr AE; Al Mushawah F; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
    J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):228-33. PubMed ID: 23688789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation between hospitals in surgical margins after first breast-conserving surgery in the Netherlands.
    van der Heiden-van der Loo M; de Munck L; Visser O; Westenend PJ; van Dalen T; Menke MB; Rutgers EJ; Peeters PH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jan; 131(2):691-8. PubMed ID: 21987038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical auditing as an instrument to improve care for patients with ovarian cancer: The Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA).
    Baldewpersad Tewarie NMS; van Driel WJ; van Ham M; Wouters MW; Kruitwagen R;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1691-1697. PubMed ID: 33581966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Value of Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence as a Quality Indicator: Hospital Variation in the Netherlands.
    van der Heiden-van der Loo M; Siesling S; Wouters MW; van Dalen T; Rutgers EJ; Peeters PH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S522-8. PubMed ID: 25986872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality measures for breast cancer surgery: initial validation of feasibility and assessment of variation among surgeons.
    McCahill LE; Privette A; James T; Sheehey-Jones J; Ratliff J; Majercik D; Krag DN; Stanley M; Harlow S
    Arch Surg; 2009 May; 144(5):455-62; discussion 462-3. PubMed ID: 19451489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Dutch surgical colorectal audit.
    Van Leersum NJ; Snijders HS; Henneman D; Kolfschoten NE; Gooiker GA; ten Berge MG; Eddes EH; Wouters MW; Tollenaar RA; ; Bemelman WA; van Dam RM; Elferink MA; Karsten TM; van Krieken JH; Lemmens VE; Rutten HJ; Manusama ER; van de Velde CJ; Meijerink WJ; Wiggers T; van der Harst E; Dekker JW; Boerma D
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1063-70. PubMed ID: 23871573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved guideline compliance after a 3-year audit of multidisciplinary colorectal cancer care in the western part of the Netherlands.
    van der Geest LG; Krijnen P; Wouters MW; Erkelens WG; Marinelli AW; Nortier HJ; Tollenaar RA; Struikmans H;
    J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 106(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22234959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adverse surgical outcomes in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Thomas J; Hanby A; Pinder SE; Ball G; Lawrence G; Maxwell A; Wallis M; Evans A; Dobson H; Clements K; Thompson A;
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jul; 50(11):1880-90. PubMed ID: 24874088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dutch Lung Surgery Audit: A National Audit Comprising Lung and Thoracic Surgery Patients.
    Ten Berge M; Beck N; Heineman DJ; Damhuis R; Steup WH; van Huijstee PJ; Eerenberg JP; Veen E; Maat A; Versteegh M; van Brakel T; Schreurs WH; Wouters MW
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Aug; 106(2):390-397. PubMed ID: 29689237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality improvement by implementing an integrated oncological care pathway for breast cancer patients.
    van Hoeve J; de Munck L; Otter R; de Vries J; Siesling S
    Breast; 2014 Aug; 23(4):364-70. PubMed ID: 24582455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. National Breast Cancer Audit: ductal carcinoma in situ management in Australia and New Zealand.
    Cuncins-Hearn A; Boult M; Babidge W; Zorbas H; Villanueva E; Evans A; Oliver D; Kollias J; Reeve T; Maddern G
    ANZ J Surg; 2007; 77(1-2):64-8. PubMed ID: 17295824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variations in treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a population-based study in the East Netherlands.
    Schouten van der Velden AP; Van Dijck JA; Wobbes T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 33(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 17084060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical presentation and surgical quality in treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Schouten van der Velden AP; Peeters PH; Koot VC; Hennipman A
    Acta Oncol; 2006; 45(5):544-9. PubMed ID: 16864167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.