These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2788570)

  • 1. [The organization of breast cancer screening in 1987].
    Elovainio L; Kajantie R; Louhivuori K; Hakama M
    Duodecim; 1989; 105(12):1184-90. PubMed ID: 2788570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
    Stomper PC; Gelman RS
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early detection of breast cancer by mammography screening.
    Moskowitz M
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1989 Aug; 1(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 2701528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single oblique-view mammography for periodic screening for breast cancer in women.
    Lundgren B; Helleberg A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1982 Mar; 68(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 6950165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity in breast cancer screening.
    Moskowitz M
    Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):576-8. PubMed ID: 3282267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammography and breast cancer.
    N Z Med J; 1990 Jun; 103(891):280-1. PubMed ID: 2356059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening mammography.
    Kopans DB
    Lancet; 1993 Aug; 342(8870):550. PubMed ID: 8102680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results.
    Thurfjell E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1995; 395():1-22. PubMed ID: 7839866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can computers help radiologists read mammograms?
    Vyborny CJ
    Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):315-7. PubMed ID: 8153298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency of single-view mammography: rate of interval cancer cases.
    Lundgren B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1979 Apr; 62(4):799-803. PubMed ID: 285293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Mammography].
    Grégoire A; Bernard C; Lavallée G; Morin C; Philie M
    Union Med Can; 1992; 121(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 1413293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The positive predictive value of mammography.
    Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):521-6. PubMed ID: 1310825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of natural history parameters of breast cancer based on non-randomized organized screening data: subsidiary analysis of effects of inter-screening interval, sensitivity, and attendance rate on reduction of advanced cancer.
    Wu JC; Hakama M; Anttila A; Yen AM; Malila N; Sarkeala T; Auvinen A; Chiu SY; Chen HH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jul; 122(2):553-66. PubMed ID: 20054645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Breast cancer screening by mammography in Sweden].
    Andersson I; Hellström L; Bjurstam N; Lundgren B; Fagerberg G; Tabár L
    Lakartidningen; 1983 Jun; 80(25):2559-62. PubMed ID: 6621186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mammography as a method for early diagnosis of female breast cancer. Experiences with a screening test in 7380 apparently healthy women].
    Scherer E; Seifert J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1971 Jul; 96(29):1207-10. PubMed ID: 4326980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Nordic capitals, 1970-1998. Trends related to mammography screening programmes.
    Törnberg S; Kemetli L; Lynge E; Helene Olsen A; Hofvind S; Wang H; Anttila A; Hakama M; Nyström L
    Acta Oncol; 2006; 45(5):528-35. PubMed ID: 16864165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and accuracy of film/screen mammography. A three-year experience.
    Warren DL; Stelling CB
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1989 Apr; 87(4):169-73. PubMed ID: 2723524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program.
    Thurfjell EL; Lernevall KA; Taube AA
    Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):241-4. PubMed ID: 8134580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A private breast imaging practice: medical audit of 25,788 screening and 1,077 diagnostic examinations.
    Robertson CL
    Radiology; 1993 Apr; 187(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 8451440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.