124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27885864)
1. Probabilistic treatment planning for pancreatic cancer treatment: prospective incorporation of respiratory motion shows only limited dosimetric benefit.
Lens E; Kotte AN; Patel A; Heerkens HD; Bal M; van Tienhoven G; Bel A; van der Horst A; Meijer GJ
Acta Oncol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 27885864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method for deriving a 4D-interpolated balanced planning target for mobile tumor radiotherapy.
Roland T; Hales R; McNutt T; Wong J; Simari P; Tryggestad E
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 22225288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Potential dosimetric benefits of adaptive tumor tracking over the internal target volume concept for stereotactic body radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer.
Karava K; Ehrbar S; Riesterer O; Roesch J; Glatz S; Klöck S; Guckenberger M; Tanadini-Lang S
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):175. PubMed ID: 29121945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric Advantages of Midventilation Compared With Internal Target Volume for Radiation Therapy of Pancreatic Cancer.
Lens E; van der Horst A; Versteijne E; van Tienhoven G; Bel A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(3):675-82. PubMed ID: 25892585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric analysis of respiratory-gated radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Xi M; Zhang L; Liu MZ; Deng XW; Huang XY; Liu H
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 20570128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy using 4D CT and multiphase CT images for treatment planning of lung cancer: evaluation of the impact on daily dose coverage.
Wang L; Hayes S; Paskalev K; Jin L; Buyyounouski MK; Ma CC; Feigenberg S
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jun; 91(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 19111362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental validation of the van Herk margin formula for lung radiation therapy.
Ecclestone G; Bissonnette JP; Heath E
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111721. PubMed ID: 24320429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the cone beam CT for internal target volume localization in lung stereotactic radiotherapy in comparison with 4D MIP images.
Wang L; Chen X; Lin MH; Xue J; Lin T; Fan J; Jin L; Ma CM
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111709. PubMed ID: 24320417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple anatomy optimization of accumulated dose.
Watkins WT; Moore JA; Gordon J; Hugo GD; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111705. PubMed ID: 25370619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Internal target volume definition using four-dimensional CT and dosimetric evaluation for hepatocellular carcinoma].
Xi M; Liu MZ; Deng XW; Liu H; Huang XY; Zhang L; Li QQ; Hu YH; Cai L; Cui NJ
Ai Zheng; 2007 Jan; 26(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17222359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of potential internal target volume of liver tumors using cine-MRI.
Akino Y; Oh RJ; Masai N; Shiomi H; Inoue T
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111704. PubMed ID: 25370618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric Consequences of 3D Versus 4D PET/CT for Target Delineation of Lung Stereotactic Radiotherapy.
Siva S; Chesson B; Callahan JW; Hardcastle N; Crawford L; Antippa P; Wright G; MacManus MP; Hicks RJ; Kron T; Ball DL
J Thorac Oncol; 2015 Jul; 10(7):1112-5. PubMed ID: 26134229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulation of dosimetric consequences of 4D-CT-based motion margin estimation for proton radiotherapy using patient tumor motion data.
Koybasi O; Mishra P; St James S; Lewis JH; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 59(4):853-67. PubMed ID: 24487573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel simple approach for incorporation of respiratory motion in stereotactic treatments of lung tumors.
Cuijpers JP; Verbakel WF; Slotman BJ; Senan S
Radiother Oncol; 2010 Dec; 97(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 21047693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling pancreatic tumor motion using 4-dimensional computed tomography and surrogate markers.
Huguet F; Yorke ED; Davidson M; Zhang Z; Jackson A; Mageras GS; Wu AJ; Goodman KA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(3):579-87. PubMed ID: 25680600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robustness assessment of a novel IMRT planning method for lung radiotherapy.
Ahanj M; Bissonnette JP; Heath E; McCann C
Phys Med; 2016 Jun; 32(6):749-57. PubMed ID: 27067716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric impact of intrafraction motion for compensator-based proton therapy of lung cancer.
Zhao L; Sandison GA; Farr JB; Hsi WC; Li XA
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3343-64. PubMed ID: 18523345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The dosimetric differences in calculating lung SBRT plans on different image data sets: Comparison of the free breathing scan to both the average intensity projection scan and to the sum of calculations on each respiratory phase of the 4DCT scan.
Gaetani Liseo F; Lautenschlaeger T; Ewing M; Langer M
Med Dosim; 2019 Autumn; 44(3):291-299. PubMed ID: 30097226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigation of a novel algorithm for true 4D-VMAT planning with comparison to tracked, gated and static delivery.
Chin E; Otto K
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2698-707. PubMed ID: 21776806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences in respiratory-induced pancreatic tumor motion between 4D treatment planning CT and daily cone beam CT, measured using intratumoral fiducials.
Lens E; van der Horst A; Kroon PS; van Hooft JE; Dávila Fajardo R; Fockens P; van Tienhoven G; Bel A
Acta Oncol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):1257-64. PubMed ID: 24758251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
