BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27886103)

  • 21. Zonal management of multi-purposes groundwater utilization based on water quality and impact on the aquifer.
    Liang CP; Jang CS; Chen CF; Chen JS
    Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Jul; 188(7):431. PubMed ID: 27343131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implementation and evaluation of different techniques to modify DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment: a case study from Bouficha aquifer, Tunisia.
    Siarkos I; Arfaoui M; Tzoraki O; Zammouri M; Hamzaoui-Azaza F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(38):89459-89478. PubMed ID: 37453015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing groundwater vulnerability potential using modified DRASTIC in Ajabshir Plain, NW of Iran.
    Asghari Moghaddam A; Nouri Sangarab S; Kadkhodaie Ilkhchi A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Mar; 195(4):497. PubMed ID: 36947260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Calibration of groundwater vulnerability mapping using the generalized reduced gradient method.
    Elçi A
    J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Dec; 207():39-49. PubMed ID: 29129334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to nitrates using the GIS-based DRASTIC and SI methods: a case study in Zacharo area, Greece.
    Panagopoulos GP; Katsanou KN; Barouchas PE
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Jan; 195(2):286. PubMed ID: 36626097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability and risk to pollution in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal.
    Shrestha S; Semkuyu DJ; Pandey VP
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jun; 556():23-35. PubMed ID: 26971207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A hybrid statistical decision-making optimization approach for groundwater vulnerability considering uncertainty.
    Gharakezloo YN; Nikoo MR; Karimi-Jashni A; Mooselu MG
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(6):8597-8612. PubMed ID: 34490577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A modified DRASTIC model for groundwater vulnerability assessment using connecting path and analytic hierarchy process methods.
    Baki AM; Ghavami SM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Nov; 30(51):111270-111283. PubMed ID: 37812345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A GIS-based approach for geospatial modeling of groundwater vulnerability and pollution risk mapping in Bou-Areg and Gareb aquifers, northeastern Morocco.
    Elmeknassi M; El Mandour A; Elgettafi M; Himi M; Tijani R; El Khantouri FA; Casas A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(37):51612-51631. PubMed ID: 33990916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Regional Aquifer Vulnerability and Pollution Sensitivity Analysis of Drastic Application to Dahomey Basin of Nigeria.
    Oke SA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Apr; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 32290197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Groundwater vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and Pesticide DRASTIC models in intense agriculture area of the Gangetic plains, India.
    Saha D; Alam F
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Dec; 186(12):8741-63. PubMed ID: 25297711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. DRASTIC framework improvement using Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and combination of Genetic Algorithm and Entropy.
    Torkashvand M; Neshat A; Javadi S; Yousefi H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Sep; 28(34):46704-46724. PubMed ID: 33201500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A high-resolution nitrate vulnerability assessment of sandy aquifers (DRASTIC-N).
    Voutchkova DD; Schullehner J; Rasmussen P; Hansen B
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 277():111330. PubMed ID: 32971506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Groundwater vulnerability assessment using the GALDIT model and the improved DRASTIC model: a case in Weibei Plain, China.
    Hu X; Ma C; Qi H; Guo X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Nov; 25(32):32524-32539. PubMed ID: 30238262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Vulnerability Assessment of Farmland Groundwater Pollution around Traditional Industrial Parks Based on the Improved DRASTIC Model-A Case Study in Shifang City, Sichuan Province, China.
    Zhang Y; Qin H; An G; Huang T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(13):. PubMed ID: 35805257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in coastal zone using SI method and GIS: case study of Bouficha aquifer (northeast Tunisia).
    Arfaoui M; Aouiti S; Azaza FH; Zammouri M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(50):75699-75715. PubMed ID: 35657555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Vulnerability and risk evaluation of agricultural nitrogen pollution for Hungary's main aquifer using DRASTIC and GLEAMS models.
    Leone A; Ripa MN; Uricchio V; Deák J; Vargay Z
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2969-78. PubMed ID: 18054423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Groundwater vulnerability to pollution assessment: an application of geospatial techniques and integrated IRN-DEMATEL-ANP decision model.
    Chukwuma EC; Okonkwo CC; Afolabi OOD; Pham QB; Anizoba DC; Okpala CD
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(17):49856-49874. PubMed ID: 36781674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A GIS-based groundwater pollution potential using DRASTIC, modified DRASTIC, and bivariate statistical models.
    Khosravi K; Sartaj M; Karimi M; Levison J; Lotfi A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Sep; 28(36):50525-50541. PubMed ID: 33961192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of drastic model and GIS: for assessing vulnerability in hard rock granitic aquifer.
    Prasad RK; Singh VS; Krishnamacharyulu SK; Banerjee P
    Environ Monit Assess; 2011 May; 176(1-4):143-55. PubMed ID: 20582738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.