These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27886393)

  • 1. Blinded versus unblinded estimation of a correlation coefficient to inform interim design adaptations.
    Kunz CU; Stallard N; Parsons N; Todd S; Friede T
    Biom J; 2017 Mar; 59(2):344-357. PubMed ID: 27886393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blinded sample size re-estimation in three-arm trials with 'gold standard' design.
    Mütze T; Friede T
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(23):3636-3653. PubMed ID: 28608469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blinded and unblinded internal pilot study designs for clinical trials with count data.
    Schneider S; Schmidli H; Friede T
    Biom J; 2013 Jul; 55(4):617-33. PubMed ID: 23703749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blinded sample size re-estimation in superiority and noninferiority trials: bias versus variance in variance estimation.
    Friede T; Kieser M
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 23509095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation in crossover trials balanced for period.
    Grayling MJ; Mander AP; Wason JMS
    Biom J; 2018 Sep; 60(5):917-933. PubMed ID: 30073679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variance estimation in clinical studies with interim sample size re-estimation.
    Miller F
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 16011681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for MMRM analysis in longitudinal data with dropouts.
    Gosho M; Hirakawa A; Noma H; Maruo K; Sato Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2389-2406. PubMed ID: 26265765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distribution of the two-sample t-test statistic following blinded sample size re-estimation.
    Lu K
    Pharm Stat; 2016 May; 15(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 26865383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increasing the sample size when the unblinded interim result is promising.
    Chen YH; DeMets DL; Lan KK
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1023-38. PubMed ID: 15057876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive blinded sample size adjustment for comparing two normal means--a mostly Bayesian approach.
    Hartley AM
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(3):230-40. PubMed ID: 22422722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of complex, partially nested clustering in a three-arm individually randomized group treatment trial: A case study with the wHOPE trial.
    Tong G; Seal KH; Becker WC; Li F; Dziura JD; Peduzzi PN; Esserman DA
    Clin Trials; 2022 Feb; 19(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 34693748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditional estimation using prior information in 2-stage group sequential designs assuming asymptotic normality when the trial terminated early.
    Shimura M; Maruo K; Gosho M
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):400-413. PubMed ID: 29687592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the inappropriateness of an EM algorithm based procedure for blinded sample size re-estimation.
    Friede T; Kieser M
    Stat Med; 2002 Jan; 21(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 11782057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re-estimating the sample size of an on-going blinded trial based on the method of randomization block sums.
    Ganju J; Xing B
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 18837073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Precision of maximum likelihood estimation in adaptive designs.
    Graf AC; Gutjahr G; Brannath W
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):922-41. PubMed ID: 26459506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal adaptive group sequential design with flexible timing of sample size determination.
    Cui L; Zhang L; Yang B
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 63():8-12. PubMed ID: 28455234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blinded sample size re-estimation for comparing over-dispersed count data incorporating follow-up lengths.
    Igeta M; Matsui S
    Stat Med; 2022 Dec; 41(29):5622-5644. PubMed ID: 36148560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Operating characteristics of sample size re-estimation with futility stopping based on conditional power.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3348-65. PubMed ID: 16345019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size re-estimation for clinical trials with longitudinal negative binomial counts including time trends.
    Asendorf T; Henderson R; Schmidli H; Friede T
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1503-1528. PubMed ID: 30575061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.