BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27886719)

  • 1. A dual stage adaptive thresholding (DuSAT) for automatic mass detection in mammograms.
    Anitha J; Dinesh Peter J; Immanuel Alex Pandian S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Jan; 138():93-104. PubMed ID: 27886719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammogram segmentation using maximal cell strength updation in cellular automata.
    Anitha J; Peter JD
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Aug; 53(8):737-49. PubMed ID: 25841356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Globally supported radial basis function based collocation method for evolution of level set in mass segmentation using mammograms.
    Kashyap KL; Bajpai MK; Khanna P
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Aug; 87():22-37. PubMed ID: 28549292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive hysteresis thresholding segmentation technique for localizing the breast masses in the curve stitching domain.
    Mughal B; Muhammad N; Sharif M
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Jun; 126():26-34. PubMed ID: 31029261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of a novel mass detection algorithm in mammograms.
    Kozegar E; Soryani M; Minaei B; Domingues I
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(4):592-600. PubMed ID: 24518702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mass Detection in Mammographic Images Using Wavelet Processing and Adaptive Threshold Technique.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):82. PubMed ID: 26811073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel automatic suspicious mass regions identification using Havrda & Charvat entropy and Otsu's N thresholding.
    Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 May; 114(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 24681199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic Pectoral Muscle Region Segmentation in Mammograms Using Genetic Algorithm and Morphological Selection.
    Shen R; Yan K; Xiao F; Chang J; Jiang C; Zhou K
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Oct; 31(5):680-691. PubMed ID: 29582242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic Detection of Pectoral Muscle Region for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Using MIAS Mammograms.
    Yoon WB; Oh JE; Chae EY; Kim HH; Lee SY; Kim KG
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():5967580. PubMed ID: 27847817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Segmentation and detection of breast cancer in mammograms combining wavelet analysis and genetic algorithm.
    Pereira DC; Ramos RP; do Nascimento MZ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Apr; 114(1):88-101. PubMed ID: 24513228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of masses in mammograms via statistically based enhancement, multilevel-thresholding segmentation, and region selection.
    Rojas Domínguez A; Nandi AK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jun; 32(4):304-15. PubMed ID: 18358699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic extraction of pectoral muscle in the MLO view of mammograms.
    Feudjio CK; Klein J; Tiedeu A; Colot O
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 58(23):8493-515. PubMed ID: 24240510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated detection of masses in mammograms by local adaptive thresholding.
    Kom G; Tiedeu A; Kom M
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Jan; 37(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 16487954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection and Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle on MLO-View Mammogram Using Enhancement Filter.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2017 Oct; 41(12):190. PubMed ID: 29071592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer aided decision system for early detection of breast cancer.
    Sheshadri HS; Kandaswamy A
    Indian J Med Res; 2006 Aug; 124(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 17015928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An automated confirmatory system for analysis of mammograms.
    Peng W; Mayorga RV; Hussein EM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Mar; 125():134-44. PubMed ID: 26742491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of intelligent systems based on Bayesian regularization network and neuro-fuzzy models for mass detection in mammograms: A comparative analysis.
    Mahersia H; Boulehmi H; Hamrouni K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():46-62. PubMed ID: 26831269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer diagnosis in digitized mammograms using curvelet moments.
    Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Zagrouba E
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Sep; 64():79-90. PubMed ID: 26151831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new approach for detecting abnormalities in mammograms using a computer-aided windowing system based on Otsu's method.
    Mohammadi-Sardo S; Labibi F; Shafiei SA
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2019 Jun; 12(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 30931495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.