216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27886996)
1. A Comparison of Remediation After The Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi Accidents.
Howard BJ; Fesenko S; Balonov M; Pröhl G; Nakayama S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 173(1-3):170-176. PubMed ID: 27886996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents: a review of the environmental impacts.
Steinhauser G; Brandl A; Johnson TE
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():800-17. PubMed ID: 24189103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparative analysis of the radionuclide composition in fallout after the Chernobyl and the Fukushima accidents].
Kotenko KV; Shinkarev SM; Abramov IuV; Granovskaia EO; Iatsenko VN; Gavrilin IuI; Margulis UIa; Garetskaia OS; Imanaka T; Khoshi M
Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2012; (10):1-5. PubMed ID: 23210176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation Exposure and Thyroid Cancer Risk After the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident in Comparison with the Chernobyl Accident.
Yamashita S; Takamura N; Ohtsuru A; Suzuki S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 27473699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agricultural land management options after the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents: The articulation of science, technology, and society.
Vandenhove H; Turcanu C
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Oct; 12(4):662-6. PubMed ID: 27640412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of Fukushima plume within regular Slovenian environmental radioactivity surveillance.
Glavič-Cindro D; Benedik L; Kožar Logar J; Vodenik B; Zorko B
Appl Radiat Isot; 2013 Nov; 81():374-8. PubMed ID: 23611815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Fukushima nuclear disaster is ongoing.
Marks AR
J Clin Invest; 2016 Jul; 126(7):2385-7. PubMed ID: 27214552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Remediation of radiocesium-contaminated liquid waste, soil, and ash: a mini review since the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.
Ding D; Zhang Z; Lei Z; Yang Y; Cai T
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Feb; 23(3):2249-63. PubMed ID: 26604196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Special issue: Radioactive contamination in forest ecosystems: From Chernobyl to Fukushima.
Takahashi M; Shaw G; Coppin F
J Environ Radioact; 2016 Sep; 161():1. PubMed ID: 26995681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Chernobyl and Fukushima-where are we now?
Wakeford R
J Radiol Prot; 2016 Jun; 36(2):E1-5. PubMed ID: 26948041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Chernobyl accident as a source of new radiological knowledge: implications for Fukushima rehabilitation and research programmes.
Balonov M
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Mar; 33(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 23295495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aerosol radioactivity record in Bratislava/Slovakia following the Fukushima accident--a comparison with global fallout and the Chernobyl accident.
Povinec PP; Sýkora I; Holý K; Gera M; Kováčik A; Brest'áková L
J Environ Radioact; 2012 Dec; 114():81-8. PubMed ID: 22683235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A review of the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident: radiation effects on the thyroid and strategies for prevention.
Nagataki S; Takamura N
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2014 Oct; 21(5):384-93. PubMed ID: 25122492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Behavior of accidentally released radiocesium in soil-water environment: Looking at Fukushima from a Chernobyl perspective.
Konoplev A; Golosov V; Laptev G; Nanba K; Onda Y; Takase T; Wakiyama Y; Yoshimura K
J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 3():568-78. PubMed ID: 26143175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating remediation of radionuclide contaminated forest near Iwaki, Japan, using radiometric methods.
Sanderson DCW; Cresswell AJ; Tamura K; Iwasaka T; Matsuzaki K
J Environ Radioact; 2016 Oct; 162-163():118-128. PubMed ID: 27232824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of synchrotron radiation and other techniques in analysis of radioactive microparticles emitted from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident-A review.
Chen F; Hu J; Takahashi Y; Yamada M; Rahman MS; Yang G
J Environ Radioact; 2019 Jan; 196():29-39. PubMed ID: 30388426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "Living in Contaminated Areas"-Consideration of Different Perspectives.
Abend M; Nisbet A; Gering F; Averin V; Andersson K; Schneider T; Mothersill C; Zeeb H; Scholz-Kreisel P; Yamashita S; Pölz-Viol C; Port M
Health Phys; 2020 Jul; 119(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 32205714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence of the radioactive fallout in the center of Asia (Russia) following the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.
Bolsunovsky A; Dementyev D
J Environ Radioact; 2011 Nov; 102(11):1062-4. PubMed ID: 21745703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Global and local cancer risks after the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident as seen from Chernobyl: a modeling study for radiocaesium ((134)Cs &(137)Cs).
Evangeliou N; Balkanski Y; Cozic A; Møller AP
Environ Int; 2014 Mar; 64():17-27. PubMed ID: 24361922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiological protection issues arising during and after the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident.
González AJ; Akashi M; Boice JD; Chino M; Homma T; Ishigure N; Kai M; Kusumi S; Lee JK; Menzel HG; Niwa O; Sakai K; Weiss W; Yamashita S; Yonekura Y
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Sep; 33(3):497-571. PubMed ID: 23803462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
