481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27887876)
1. An accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the augmented maxilla using osteosynthesis screws.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Bergé SJ; Xi T; Maal TJJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 27887876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Bergé SJ; Soehardi RA; Xi T; de Haan AF; Schutyser F; Maal TJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 25181255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches.
Vieira DM; Sotto-Maior BS; Barros CA; Reis ES; Francischone CE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinically relevant validation method for implant placement after virtual planning.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; Schutyser F; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1265-72. PubMed ID: 22905668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of first stage bone augmentation screws to stabilize the surgical template in the second stage.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 44(6):781-4. PubMed ID: 25682461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.
Katsoulis J; Pazera P; Mericske-Stern R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.
Demetriades N; Park JI; Laskarides C
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 20662673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Definitive CAD/CAM-guided prosthesis for immediate loading of bone-grafted maxilla: a case report.
Kupeyan HK; Shaffner M; Armstrong J
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 16919024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism.
Van Assche N; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 37(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 20447264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel dental implant guided surgery based on integration of surgical template and augmented reality.
Lin YK; Yau HT; Wang IC; Zheng C; Chung KH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):543-53. PubMed ID: 23879701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation.
Di Giacomo GA; da Silva JV; da Silva AM; Paschoal GH; Cury PR; Szarf G
J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):410-9. PubMed ID: 21819249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla: a proof-of-concept prospective study with a follow-up of between 36 and 54 months.
Pozzi A; Sannino G; Barlattani A
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Nov; 108(5):286-97. PubMed ID: 23107236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Implant-supported 3D-printed bridge in the edentulous maxilla].
Gols Linthorst FAJ; Verhamme L; Maal T; Soehardi A; Meijer GJ
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2017 May; 124(5):249-252. PubMed ID: 28501879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae.
D'haese J; Van De Velde T; Elaut L; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
