161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27888350)
1. Totally implantable vascular access device (TIVAD) placement: a modified technique that takes post-procedure aesthetic aspects into account.
Liberale G
Support Care Cancer; 2017 Apr; 25(4):1137-1140. PubMed ID: 27888350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the perceptions and cosmetic satisfaction of breast cancer patients undergoing totally implantable vascular access device (TIVAD) placement.
Liberale G; El Houkayem M; Viste C; Bouazza F; Moreau M; El Nakadi I; Veys I
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Dec; 24(12):5035-5040. PubMed ID: 27495928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Totally implanted venous access devices implanted in the saphenous vein. Relation between the reservoir site and comfort/discomfort of the patients.
Toro A; Mannino M; Cappello G; Celeste S; Cordio S; Di Carlo I
Ann Vasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 26(8):1127.e9-1127.e13. PubMed ID: 22951064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The "Arm-to-Chest Tunneling" technique: A modified technique for arm placement of implantable ports or central catheters.
Kehagias E; Tsetis D
J Vasc Access; 2019 Nov; 20(6):771-777. PubMed ID: 30939969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Which is Better for Patients with Breast Cancer: Totally Implanted Vascular Access Devices (TIVAD) or Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)?
Tang TT; Liu L; Li CX; Li YT; Zhou T; Li HP; Wang J
World J Surg; 2019 Sep; 43(9):2245-2249. PubMed ID: 31098669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The "L-shaped tunneling technique": a modified technique facilitating a more discreet implantable port positioning.
Kehagias E; Tsetis D
J Vasc Access; 2016; 17(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 26797900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasound-based prediction of cephalic vein cutdown success prior to totally implantable venous access device placement.
Staszewicz W; Naiken SP; Mennet A; Meyer J; Righini M; Morel P; Toso C
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2019 Nov; 7(6):865-869.e1. PubMed ID: 31495770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Morbidity of chemotherapy administration and satisfaction in breast cancer patients: a comparative study of totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) versus peripheral venous access usage.
Singh KR; Agarwal G; Nanda G; Chand G; Mishra A; Agarwal A; Verma AK; Mishra SK; Goyal P
World J Surg; 2014 May; 38(5):1084-92. PubMed ID: 24305930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Totally implantable vascular access devices 30 years after the first procedure. What has changed and what is still unsolved?
Biffi R; Toro A; Pozzi S; Di Carlo I
Support Care Cancer; 2014 Jun; 22(6):1705-14. PubMed ID: 24659216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality-of-life assessment: arm TIVAD versus chest TIVAD.
Burbridge B; Goyal K
J Vasc Access; 2016 Nov; 17(6):527-534. PubMed ID: 27768211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Seat belt associated central line fracture--a previously unreported complication in cystic fibrosis.
Ghayyda SN; Roland D; Cade A
J Cyst Fibros; 2008 Sep; 7(5):448-9. PubMed ID: 18455967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
Di Carlo I; Barbagallo F; Toro A; Sofia M; Lombardo R; Cordio S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Introduction of a specialized consultation prior to insertion of totally implantable access venous devices: Impact on cancellation rate and patient satisfaction.
Colucci N; Gregoris A; Meyer J; Naiken SP; Staszewicz W; Gialamas E; Toso C; Abbassi Z
Vascular; 2020 Dec; 28(6):816-820. PubMed ID: 32508290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Totally implantable venous access device in children with cancer lead to disfiguring scar.
Braam KI; Veening MA; Schouten-van Meeteren AY; van Dulmen-den Broeder E; Heij HA
Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2013 Mar; 30(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 23302017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Totally implantable venous access devices: retrospective analysis of different insertion techniques and predictors of complications in 796 devices implanted in a single institution.
Granziera E; Scarpa M; Ciccarese A; Filip B; Cagol M; Manfredi V; Alfieri R; Celentano C; Cappellato S; Castoro C; Meroni M
BMC Surg; 2014 May; 14():27. PubMed ID: 24886342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Routine chest X-ray is not mandatory after fluoroscopy-guided totally implantable venous access device insertion.
Thomopoulos T; Meyer J; Staszewicz W; Bagetakos I; Scheffler M; Lomessy A; Toso C; Becker CD; Morel P
Ann Vasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 28(2):345-50. PubMed ID: 24360633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective evaluation of totally implantable venous access port devices: early and late complications.
Gurkan S; Seber S; Gur O; Yetisyigit T; Okan Donbaloglu M; Ozkaramanli Gur D
J BUON; 2015; 20(1):338-45. PubMed ID: 25778336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel "shrug technique" for totally implantable venous access devices via the external jugular vein: A consecutive series of 254 patients.
Kagawa T; Ueyama S; Kobayashi T; Okabayashi H; Kuroda S; Fujiwara T
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 115(3):291-295. PubMed ID: 27813159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The catheter is stuck: complications experienced during removal of a totally implantable venous access device. A single-center study in 200 children.
Wilson GJ; van Noesel MM; Hop WC; van de Ven C
J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Oct; 41(10):1694-8. PubMed ID: 17011271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of an ultrasound-guided low-approach insertion technique in three types of totally implantable access port.
Cheng HW; Ting CK; Chu YC; Chang WK; Chan KH; Chen PT
J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 May; 77(5):246-52. PubMed ID: 24726676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
