These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27888695)

  • 1. Automatic identification of gait events during walking on uneven surfaces.
    Eckardt N; Kibele A
    Gait Posture; 2017 Feb; 52():83-86. PubMed ID: 27888695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of kinematic-based gait event detection methods in a self-paced treadmill application.
    Hendershot BD; Mahon CE; Pruziner AL
    J Biomech; 2016 Dec; 49(16):4146-4149. PubMed ID: 27825601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of kinematic algorithms to estimate gait events during overground running.
    Smith L; Preece S; Mason D; Bramah C
    Gait Posture; 2015 Jan; 41(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 25212739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A kinematic algorithm to identify gait events during running at different speeds and with different footstrike types.
    Handsaker JC; Forrester SE; Folland JP; Black MI; Allen SJ
    J Biomech; 2016 Dec; 49(16):4128-4133. PubMed ID: 27814970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment and validation of a simple automated method for the detection of gait events and intervals.
    Ghoussayni S; Stevens C; Durham S; Ewins D
    Gait Posture; 2004 Dec; 20(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 15531173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and validation of an accelerometer-based method for quantifying gait events.
    Boutaayamou M; Schwartz C; Stamatakis J; Denoël V; Maquet D; Forthomme B; Croisier JL; Macq B; Verly JG; Garraux G; Brüls O
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Feb; 37(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 25618221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of three kinematic gait event detection methods during overground and treadmill walking for individuals post stroke.
    French MA; Koller C; Arch ES
    J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 99():109481. PubMed ID: 31718818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data.
    Zeni JA; Richards JG; Higginson JS
    Gait Posture; 2008 May; 27(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 17723303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Five Kinematic-Based Identification Methods of Foot Contact Events During Treadmill Walking and Running at Different Speeds.
    Alvim F; Cerqueira L; Netto AD; Leite G; Muniz A
    J Appl Biomech; 2015 Oct; 31(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 25950421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and validation of FootNet; a new kinematic algorithm to improve foot-strike and toe-off detection in treadmill running.
    Rivadulla A; Chen X; Weir G; Cazzola D; Trewartha G; Hamill J; Preatoni E
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0248608. PubMed ID: 34370747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using horizontal heel displacement to identify heel strike instants in normal gait.
    Banks JJ; Chang WR; Xu X; Chang CC
    Gait Posture; 2015 Jun; 42(1):101-3. PubMed ID: 25907129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of an IMU-based foot-ground contact detection (FGCD) algorithm.
    Kim M; Lee D
    Ergonomics; 2017 Mar; 60(3):384-403. PubMed ID: 27068742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the performance of accelerometer-based gait event detection algorithms in different real-world scenarios using the MAREA gait database.
    Khandelwal S; Wickström N
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jan; 51():84-90. PubMed ID: 27736735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel kinematic detection of foot-strike and toe-off events during noninstrumented treadmill running to estimate contact time.
    Patoz A; Lussiana T; Gindre C; Malatesta D
    J Biomech; 2021 Nov; 128():110737. PubMed ID: 34517256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of toe-off event time during treadmill locomotion using kinematic data.
    De Witt JK
    J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):3067-9. PubMed ID: 20801452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards validation and standardization of automatic gait event identification algorithms for use in paediatric pathological populations.
    Visscher RMS; Sansgiri S; Freslier M; Harlaar J; Brunner R; Taylor WR; Singh NB
    Gait Posture; 2021 May; 86():64-69. PubMed ID: 33684617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative evaluation of the major determinants of human gait.
    Lin YC; Gfoehler M; Pandy MG
    J Biomech; 2014 Apr; 47(6):1324-31. PubMed ID: 24582352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of the performance of 17 algorithms from a systematic review: Influence of sensor position, analysed variable and computational approach in gait timing estimation from IMU measurements.
    Pacini Panebianco G; Bisi MC; Stagni R; Fantozzi S
    Gait Posture; 2018 Oct; 66():76-82. PubMed ID: 30170137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ankle torque control that shifts the center of pressure from heel to toe contributes non-zero sagittal plane angular momentum during human walking.
    Gruben KG; Boehm WL
    J Biomech; 2014 Apr; 47(6):1389-94. PubMed ID: 24524989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying gait events without a force plate during running: a comparison of methods.
    Leitch J; Stebbins J; Paolini G; Zavatsky AB
    Gait Posture; 2011 Jan; 33(1):130-2. PubMed ID: 21084195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.