These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27889076)

  • 1. Impression technique for a complete-arch prosthesis with multiple implants using additive manufacturing technologies.
    Revilla-León M; Sánchez-Rubio JL; Oteo-Calatayud J; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):714-720. PubMed ID: 27889076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital workflow for the design and additively manufacture of a splinted framework and custom tray for the impression of multiple implants: A dental technique.
    Piedra Cascón W; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):805-811. PubMed ID: 30067479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simplified fabrication of an implant-supported framework with luted abutment cylinders.
    Stumpel LJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 28024820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complete arch implant impression technique.
    Ma J; Rubenstein JE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):405-10. PubMed ID: 22633598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of Different Implant Impression Techniques: Evaluation of New Tray Design Concept.
    Liu DY; Cader FN; Abduo J; Palamara J
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e682-e687. PubMed ID: 29286181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques.
    de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit.
    Papaspyridakos P; Hirayama H; Chen CJ; Ho CH; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1099-105. PubMed ID: 26374268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An accurate, single, platform-level impression technique for the fabrication of prosthetic restorations on dental implants.
    Marder MZ; Marder RW
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Oct; 25(5):495-9. PubMed ID: 16250571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings.
    Dumbrigue HB; Gurun DC; Javid NS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):108-10. PubMed ID: 10898848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A modified impression technique for implant-supported restoration.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Nissan J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jun; 71(6):589-91. PubMed ID: 8040821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
    Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impression techniques for multiple implants: a photoelastic analysis. Part I: comparison of three direct methods.
    Lopes-Júnior I; de Lima Lucas B; Gomide HA; Gomes VL
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):539-44. PubMed ID: 22066473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A technique for verifying implant analog positions in the definitive cast.
    Sadid-Zadeh R; O'Neal SJ; Liu PR; Aponte-Wesson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 23522369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft liner-retained, implant-supported overdenture: a technical note.
    Cain JR; Mitchell DL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):857-60. PubMed ID: 9857598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.