617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27889112)
1. Risk factors for cut-out of double lag screw fixation in proximal femoral fractures.
Buyukdogan K; Caglar O; Isik S; Tokgozoglu M; Atilla B
Injury; 2017 Feb; 48(2):414-418. PubMed ID: 27889112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A mathematical simulation of the tip-apex distance and the calcar-referenced tip-apex distance for intertrochanteric fractures reduced with lag screws.
Li S; Chang SM; Jin YM; Zhang YQ; Niu WX; Du SC; Zhang LZ; Ma H
Injury; 2016 Jun; 47(6):1302-8. PubMed ID: 27087281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does an additional antirotation U-Blade (RC) lag screw improve treatment of AO/OTA 31 A1-3 fractures with gamma 3 nail?
Lang NW; Arthold C; Joestl J; Gormasz A; Boesmueller S; Hajdu S; Sarahrudi K
Injury; 2016 Dec; 47(12):2733-2738. PubMed ID: 27832831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gamma 3 U-Blade lag screws in patients with trochanteric femur fractures: are rotation control lag screws better than others?
Yoo J; Kim S; Choi J; Hwang J
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Dec; 14(1):440. PubMed ID: 31842911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures.
Geller JA; Saifi C; Morrison TA; Macaulay W
Int Orthop; 2010 Jun; 34(5):719-22. PubMed ID: 19618186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does Computer-assisted Surgery Improve Lag Screw Placement During Cephalomedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures?
Kuhl M; Beimel C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2132-2144. PubMed ID: 32496321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should the tip-apex distance (TAD) rule be modified for the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA)? A retrospective study.
Nikoloski AN; Osbrough AL; Yates PJ
J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 8():35. PubMed ID: 24135331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective randomized study comparing two cephalomedullary nails for elderly intertrochanteric fractures: Zimmer natural nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation II.
Shin YS; Chae JE; Kang TW; Han SB
Injury; 2017 Jul; 48(7):1550-1557. PubMed ID: 28433451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of tip-apex distance and femoral head lag screw position on treatment outcomes of unstable intertrochanteric fractures using cephalomedullary nails.
Lee CH; Su KC; Chen KH; Pan CC; Wu YC
J Int Med Res; 2018 Jun; 46(6):2128-2140. PubMed ID: 29848122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Measuring method of tip-apex distance in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation].
Wang H; Wang Y; Yan B; Zhong L; Jiang J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 28(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 24693779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance cut-offs may be the best predictors for cut-out risk after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures.
Caruso G; Corradi N; Caldaria A; Bottin D; Lo Re D; Lorusso V; Morotti C; Valpiani G; Massari L
Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):357. PubMed ID: 35013492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant cut-out following cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric femur fractures: Are helical blades to blame?
Ibrahim I; Appleton PT; Wixted JJ; DeAngelis JP; Rodriguez EK
Injury; 2019 Apr; 50(4):926-930. PubMed ID: 30885393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures.
Kashigar A; Vincent A; Gunton MJ; Backstein D; Safir O; Kuzyk PR
Bone Joint J; 2014 Aug; 96-B(8):1029-34. PubMed ID: 25086117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of tip apex distance and cut-out complications between helical blades and lag screws in intertrochanteric fractures among the elderly: a meta-analysis.
Li S; Chang SM; Niu WX; Ma H
J Orthop Sci; 2015 Nov; 20(6):1062-9. PubMed ID: 26481124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intertrochanteric fracture: Association between the coronal position of the lag screw and stress distribution.
Liang C; Peng R; Jiang N; Xie G; Wang L; Yu B
Asian J Surg; 2018 May; 41(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 28366494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is tip apex distance as important as we think? A biomechanical study examining optimal lag screw placement.
Kane P; Vopat B; Heard W; Thakur N; Paller D; Koruprolu S; Born C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 472(8):2492-8. PubMed ID: 24760583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation.
Pervez H; Parker MJ; Vowler S
Injury; 2004 Oct; 35(10):994-8. PubMed ID: 15351665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.
Andruszkow H; Frink M; Frömke C; Matityahu A; Zeckey C; Mommsen P; Suntardjo S; Krettek C; Hildebrand F
Int Orthop; 2012 Nov; 36(11):2347-54. PubMed ID: 23011721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of compression hip screw and gamma nail for treatment of peritrochanteric fractures.
Bess RJ; Jolly SA
J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 9322196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of the PFNA screw position on the risk of cut-out in an unstable intertrochanteric fracture: a computational analysis.
Quental C; Vasconcelos S; Folgado J; Guerra-Pinto F
Med Eng Phys; 2021 Nov; 97():70-76. PubMed ID: 34756340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
