BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27890120)

  • 1. Influence of lane departure warnings onset and reliability on car drivers' behaviors.
    Navarro J; Deniel J; Yousfi E; Jallais C; Bueno M; Fort A
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):123-131. PubMed ID: 27890120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of false warnings on partial and full lane departure warnings effectiveness and acceptance in car driving.
    Navarro J; Yousfi E; Deniel J; Jallais C; Bueno M; Fort A
    Ergonomics; 2016 Dec; 59(12):1553-1564. PubMed ID: 26916010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual and steering behaviours during lane departures: a longitudinal study of interactions between lane departure warning system, driving task and driving experience.
    Navarro J; Reynaud E; Pelerin M; Ouimet MC; Gabaude C; Schnebelen D
    Ergonomics; 2024 Jan; 67(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 37074777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of an integrated collision warning system on teenage driver behavior.
    Jermakian JS; Bao S; Buonarosa ML; Sayer JR; Farmer CM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():65-75. PubMed ID: 28454872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aging: Older Adults' Driving Behavior Using Longitudinal and Lateral Warning Systems.
    Souders DJ; Charness N; Roque NA; Pham H
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):229-248. PubMed ID: 31361158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A neuroergonomics approach to driver's cooperation with Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Schnebelen D; Reynaud E; Ouimet MC; Seguin P; Navarro J
    Behav Brain Res; 2024 Jan; 456():114699. PubMed ID: 37802390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating driver drowsiness countermeasures.
    Gaspar JG; Brown TL; Schwarz CW; Lee JD; Kang J; Higgins JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S58-S63. PubMed ID: 28323444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles.
    Kidd DG; Cicchino JB; Reagan IJ; Kerfoot LB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S44-S50. PubMed ID: 28339302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance.
    Reinmueller K; Steinhauser M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():217-229. PubMed ID: 31063907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advanced driver assistance systems: Using multimodal redundant warnings to enhance road safety.
    Biondi F; Strayer DL; Rossi R; Gastaldi M; Mulatti C
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():238-244. PubMed ID: 27633218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lateral control assistance for car drivers: a comparison of motor priming and warning systems.
    Navarro J; Mars F; Hoc JM
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):950-60. PubMed ID: 17915609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of intelligent advanced warnings on drivers negotiating the dilemma zone.
    Gugerty L; McIntyre SE; Link D; Zimmerman K; Tolani D; Huang P; Pokorny RA
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1021-35. PubMed ID: 25277014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lane Departure Warning Mechanism of Limited False Alarm Rate using Extreme Learning Residual Network and ϵ-greedy LSTM.
    Gao Q; Yin H; Zhang W
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 31979330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of single versus multiple warnings on driver performance.
    Cummings ML; Kilgore RM; Wang E; Tijerina L; Kochhar DS
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1097-106. PubMed ID: 18074708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In-vehicle warnings for work zone and related rear-end collisions: A driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106768. PubMed ID: 35820314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the impact of advanced driver assistance systems on driving distraction and risky behaviour: An empirical analysis of irish commercial drivers.
    Masello L; Sheehan B; Castignani G; Shannon D; Murphy F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Apr; 183():106969. PubMed ID: 36696744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cooperative warning systems: The impact of false and unnecessary alarms on drivers' compliance.
    Naujoks F; Kiesel A; Neukum A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():162-175. PubMed ID: 27639195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.