These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27890120)

  • 41. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Gaze position modulates the effectiveness of forward collision warnings for drowsy drivers.
    Gaspar JG; Schwarz CW; Brown TL; Kang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():25-30. PubMed ID: 29277383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems.
    Lubbe N
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():23-32. PubMed ID: 28454868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Observed activation status of lane departure warning and forward collision warning of Honda vehicles at dealership service centers.
    Reagan IJ; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Nov; 17(8):827-32. PubMed ID: 26891465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of Fixed and sEMG-Based Adaptive Shared Steering Control on Distracted Driver Behavior.
    Wang Z; Suga S; Nacpil EJC; Yang B; Nakano K
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(22):. PubMed ID: 34833767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Design and cognitive evaluation of 6 dynamic lane departure warning symbols.
    Maddahi H; Pouyakian M; Tabatabai Ghomsheh F; Piri L; Osqueizadeh R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Nov; 17(8):842-7. PubMed ID: 26902543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. To Go or Not to Go: Stimulus-Response Compatibility for Tactile and Auditory Pedestrian Collision Warnings.
    Straughn SM; Gray R; Tan HZ
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2009; 2(2):111-117. PubMed ID: 27788102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effects of lane width, shoulder width, and road cross-sectional reallocation on drivers' behavioral adaptations.
    Mecheri S; Rosey F; Lobjois R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():65-73. PubMed ID: 28486150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.
    Kountouriotis GK; Spyridakos P; Carsten OMJ; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():39-45. PubMed ID: 27497055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.
    Goncalves RC; Louw TL; Quaresma M; Madigan R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Car Gestures - Advisory warning using additional steering wheel angles.
    Maag C; Schneider N; Lübbeke T; Weisswange TH; Goerick C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Oct; 83():143-53. PubMed ID: 26264518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Designing feedback to mitigate teen distracted driving: A social norms approach.
    Merrikhpour M; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():185-194. PubMed ID: 28544953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effectiveness of visual warnings on young drivers hazard anticipation and hazard mitigation abilities.
    Hajiseyedjavadi F; Zhang T; Agrawal R; Knodler M; Fisher D; Samuel S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():41-52. PubMed ID: 29277384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Driving distracted with friends: Effect of passengers and driver distraction on young drivers' behavior.
    Zhang F; Mehrotra S; Roberts SC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105246. PubMed ID: 31421453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Use patterns among early adopters of adaptive cruise control.
    Xiong H; Boyle LN; Moeckli J; Dow BR; Brown TL
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):722-33. PubMed ID: 23156618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.
    Haque MM; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():42-53. PubMed ID: 24129320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Is More Better? - Night Vision Enhancement System's Pedestrian Warning Modes and Older Drivers.
    Brown T; He Y; Roe C; Schnell T
    Ann Adv Automot Med; 2010; 54():343-50. PubMed ID: 21050616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():230-9. PubMed ID: 27107472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Proactive vs. reactive car driving: EEG evidence for different driving strategies of older drivers.
    Karthaus M; Wascher E; Getzmann S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191500. PubMed ID: 29352314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The consequences of an increase in heavy goods vehicles for passenger car drivers' mental workload and behaviour: a simulator study.
    de Waard D; Kruizinga A; Brookhuis KA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):818-28. PubMed ID: 18329437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.