These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27890161)

  • 21. Interference between postural control and spatial vs. non-spatial auditory reaction time tasks in older adults.
    Fuhrman SI; Redfern MS; Jennings JR; Furman JM
    J Vestib Res; 2015; 25(2):47-55. PubMed ID: 26410669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A behavioral study of distraction by vibrotactile novelty.
    Parmentier FB; Ljungberg JK; Elsley JV; Lindkvist M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21517219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of tactile feedback on movement speed and precision during work-related tasks using a computer mouse.
    Viau A; Najm M; Chapman CE; Levin MF
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):816-26. PubMed ID: 16553068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing tactile perception: effects of different visual barriers on performance.
    van Wijk CH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Dec; 113(3):921-8. PubMed ID: 22403935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multi-modal distraction: insights from children's limited attention.
    Matusz PJ; Broadbent H; Ferrari J; Forrest B; Merkley R; Scerif G
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():156-65. PubMed ID: 25497524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hazard perception training in young bicyclists improves early detection of risk: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.
    Zeuwts LHRH; Vansteenkiste P; Deconinck FJA; Cardon G; Lenoir M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():112-121. PubMed ID: 28865926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of simulated cataracts on drivers' hazard perception ability.
    Marrington SA; Horswill MS; Wood JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1121-7. PubMed ID: 19050466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words.
    Parmentier FB; Turner J; Perez L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 23339333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tactile-auditory saltation: spatiotemporal integration across sensory modalities.
    Trojan J; Getzmann S; Möller J; Kleinböhl D; Hölzl R
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Aug; 460(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19477228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
    Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Identifying the factors affecting bike-sharing usage and degree of satisfaction in Ningbo, China.
    Guo Y; Zhou J; Wu Y; Li Z
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185100. PubMed ID: 28934321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance.
    Posner MI; Nissen MJ; Klein RM
    Psychol Rev; 1976 Mar; 83(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 769017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Human trimodal perception follows optimal statistical inference.
    Wozny DR; Beierholm UR; Shams L
    J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):24.1-11. PubMed ID: 18484830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improved selective and divided spatial attention in early blind subjects.
    Collignon O; Renier L; Bruyer R; Tranduy D; Veraart C
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1075(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 16460716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interruption management: the use of attention-directing tactile cues.
    Hopp PJ; Smith CA; Clegg BA; Heggestad ED
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15960083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Climbing With a Head-Mounted Display: Dual-Task Costs.
    Woodham A; Billinghurst M; Helton WS
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):452-61. PubMed ID: 26865416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pain and Distraction According to Sensory Modalities: Current Findings and Future Directions.
    Bascour-Sandoval C; Salgado-Salgado S; Gómez-Milán E; Fernández-Gómez J; Michael GA; Gálvez-García G
    Pain Pract; 2019 Sep; 19(7):686-702. PubMed ID: 31104345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Further evidence that congenitally blind participants react faster to auditory and tactile spatial targets.
    Collignon O; De Volder AG
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Dec; 63(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 20025387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.