384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27890355)
1. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Gloria A; Lanzotti A; Maietta S; Martorelli M
Dent Mater; 2017 Jan; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 27890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Martorelli M; Sorrentino R; Gloria A
Am J Dent; 2017 Aug; 30(4):227-232. PubMed ID: 29178706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adhesive class I restorations in sound molar teeth incorporating combined resin-composite and glass ionomer materials: CAD-FE modeling and analysis.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Di Rienzo A; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1514-1522. PubMed ID: 31395448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical behavior of Class I cavities restored by different material combinations under loading and polymerization shrinkage stress. A 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello PP; Ciaramella S; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Borges AL; Tribst JP; Dal Piva A; Garcia-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2019 Apr; 32(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 31094138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shrinkage stress and cuspal deflection in MOD restorations: analytical solutions and design guidelines.
Aregawi WA; Fok ASL
Dent Mater; 2021 May; 37(5):783-795. PubMed ID: 33612308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the restorative procedure factors on stress values in premolar with MOD cavity: a finite element study.
Kantardžić I; Vasiljević D; Lužanin O; Maravić T; Blažić L
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Oct; 56(10):1875-1886. PubMed ID: 29633113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of minimally invasive endodontic access cavities and bonding status of resin composites on the mechanical property of endodontically-treated teeth: A finite element study.
Lin F; Ordinola-Zapata R; Fok ASL; Lee R
Dent Mater; 2022 Feb; 38(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 34930622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites.
Ausiello P; Apicella A; Davidson CL; Rengo S
J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1269-77. PubMed ID: 11522306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of the shape of the layers in photo-cured dental restorations on the shrinkage stress peaks-FEM study.
Kowalczyk P
Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):e83-91. PubMed ID: 19786300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Restorative material and loading type influence on the biomechanical behavior of wedge shaped cervical lesions.
Pereira FA; Zeola LF; de Almeida Milito G; Reis BR; Pereira RD; Soares PV
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Apr; 20(3):433-41. PubMed ID: 26159778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Heat Transfer and Thermal Stress Analysis of a Mandibular Molar Tooth Restored by Different Indirect Restorations Using a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Method.
Çelik Köycü B; İmirzalıoğlu P
J Prosthodont; 2017 Jul; 26(5):460-473. PubMed ID: 26618930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of cavity design preparation on stress values in maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.
Kantardzić I; Vasiljević D; Blazić L; Luzanin O
Croat Med J; 2012 Dec; 53(6):568-76. PubMed ID: 23275322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
