These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27890653)

  • 1. Recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies: A systematic review update.
    Elmansy HE; Lingeman JE
    Int J Surg; 2016 Dec; 36(Pt D):676-680. PubMed ID: 27890653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shock wave lithotripsy: the new phoenix?
    Neisius A; Lipkin ME; Rassweiler JJ; Zhong P; Preminger GM; Knoll T
    World J Urol; 2015 Feb; 33(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 25081010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Current status of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in urinary lithiasis.].
    Pereira-Arias JG; Gamarra-Quintanilla M; Urdaneta-Salegui LF; Mora-Christian JA; Sánchez-Vazquez A; Astobieta-Odriozola A; Ibarluzea-González G
    Arch Esp Urol; 2017 Mar; 70(2):263-287. PubMed ID: 28300033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shock wave technology and application: an update.
    Rassweiler JJ; Knoll T; Köhrmann KU; McAteer JA; Lingeman JE; Cleveland RO; Bailey MR; Chaussy C
    Eur Urol; 2011 May; 59(5):784-96. PubMed ID: 21354696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
    Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [What is the current status of shock wave lithotripsy?].
    Neisius A
    Urologe A; 2017 Sep; 56(9):1147-1157. PubMed ID: 28766005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.
    Lingeman JE; McAteer JA; Gnessin E; Evan AP
    Nat Rev Urol; 2009 Dec; 6(12):660-70. PubMed ID: 19956196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy in the 21st century.
    Argyropoulos AN; Tolley DA
    Eur Urol; 2007 Aug; 52(2):344-52. PubMed ID: 17499914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.
    Lawler AC; Ghiraldi EM; Tong C; Friedlander JI
    Curr Urol Rep; 2017 Apr; 18(4):25. PubMed ID: 28247327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal frequency of shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Li K; Lin T; Zhang C; Fan X; Xu K; Bi L; Han J; Huang H; Liu H; Dong W; Duan Y; Yu M; Huang J
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1260-7. PubMed ID: 23538240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [New strategies and protocols in SWL.].
    Budía Alba A; Bahilo Mateu P; Ordaz Jurado G; López-Acón JD; Trassierra Villa M; Boronat Tormo F
    Arch Esp Urol; 2017 Jan; 70(1):113-123. PubMed ID: 28221146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technological innovations in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Mosquera Seoane L; Ortiz Salvador JB; Budia Alba A; Perez Fentes DA
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2024; 48(1):105-110. PubMed ID: 37858618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is shock wave lithotripsy efficient for the elderly stone formers? Results of a matched-pair analysis.
    Philippou P; Lamrani D; Moraitis K; Bach C; Masood J; Buchholz N
    Urol Res; 2012 Aug; 40(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 21901557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: benefits, limitationsand prospects].
    Pavlov VN; Alekseev AV; Pushkarev AM; Iskhakova RS; Garipov MR; Makhmutyanova AA
    Urologiia; 2016 Aug; (4):122-126. PubMed ID: 28247739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ureteral stones: SWL treatment.
    Zanetti G
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Mar; 83(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 21585162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?
    Müllhaupt G; Engeler DS; Schmid HP; Abt D
    BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():72. PubMed ID: 26201514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of High, Intermediate, and Low Frequency Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Urinary Tract Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
    Kang DH; Cho KS; Ham WS; Lee H; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158661. PubMed ID: 27387279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
    Chaussy CG; Tiselius HG
    Urolithiasis; 2018 Feb; 46(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29177561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive factors and management of steinstrasse after shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis--a multivariate analysis study.
    Onal B; Citgez S; Tansu N; Demirdag C; Dogan C; Gonul B; Demirkesen O; Obek C; Erozenci A
    Urology; 2012 Nov; 80(5):1127-31. PubMed ID: 22999455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of modification of shock-wave delivery on stone fragmentation.
    Talic RF; Rabah DM
    Curr Opin Urol; 2006 Mar; 16(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 16479209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.