180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27890866)
1. Claims for fertility interventions: a systematic assessment of statements on UK fertility centre websites.
Spencer EA; Mahtani KR; Goldacre B; Heneghan C
BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e013940. PubMed ID: 27890866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Who needs ICSI? A nationwide UK survey on ICSI use.
Jones J; Horne G; Fitzgerald C
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2012 Sep; 15(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 22894750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of ethnicity on live birth rates after in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment: analysis of UK national database.
Maalouf W; Maalouf W; Campbell B; Jayaprakasan K
BJOG; 2017 May; 124(6):904-910. PubMed ID: 27539893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Should the HFEA be regulating the add-on treatments for IVF/ICSI in the UK?: FOR: Regulation of the fertility add-on treatments for IVF.
Rutherford AJ
BJOG; 2017 Nov; 124(12):1848. PubMed ID: 29052360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. ICSI does not improve reproductive outcomes in autologous ovarian response cycles with non-male factor subfertility.
Supramaniam PR; Granne I; Ohuma EO; Lim LN; McVeigh E; Venkatakrishnan R; Becker CM; Mittal M
Hum Reprod; 2020 Mar; 35(3):583-594. PubMed ID: 32161952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should the HFEA be regulating the add-on treatments for IVF/ICSI in the UK?: AGAINST: HFEA regulation of add-on IVF/ICSI.
Murdoch A
BJOG; 2017 Nov; 124(12):1849. PubMed ID: 29052363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The prevalence, promotion and pricing of three IVF add-ons on fertility clinic websites.
van de Wiel L; Wilkinson J; Athanasiou P; Harper J
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Nov; 41(5):801-806. PubMed ID: 32888824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of fertility clinic marketing of complementary therapy add-ons.
Stein J; Harper JC
Reprod Biomed Soc Online; 2021 Aug; 13():24-36. PubMed ID: 34141907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. IVF or ICSI for fertility preservation?
Aggarwal B; Evans AL; Ryan H; Martins da Silva SJ
Reprod Fertil; 2021 Jan; 2(1):L1-L3. PubMed ID: 35128437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysing adherence to guidelines for time-lapse imaging information on UK fertility clinic websites.
Perrotta M; Zampino L; Geampana A; Bhide P
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2024 Dec; 27(1):2346595. PubMed ID: 38769878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term GnRH agonist therapy before in vitro fertilisation (IVF) for improving fertility outcomes in women with endometriosis.
Georgiou EX; Melo P; Baker PE; Sallam HN; Arici A; Garcia-Velasco JA; Abou-Setta AM; Becker C; Granne IE
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 2019(11):. PubMed ID: 31747470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) versus conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in couples with non-severe male infertility (NSMI-ICSI): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Zheng D; Zeng L; Yang R; Lian Y; Zhu YM; Liang X; Tang L; Wang H; Cao Y; Hao G; Liu J; Zhao J; Wang R; Mol BW; Li R; Huang HF; Qiao J
BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e030366. PubMed ID: 31575574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Talking about possible IVF/ICSI failure and need for multiple cycles in treatment planning: qualitative investigation of multi-cycle planning and its acceptability to patients and staff.
Harrison C; Boivin J; Gameiro S
Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 37(3):488-498. PubMed ID: 35040994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct-to-consumer advertising of success rates for medically assisted reproduction: a review of national clinic websites.
Wilkinson J; Vail A; Roberts SA
BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e012218. PubMed ID: 28082363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro maturation in subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing assisted reproduction.
Siristatidis CS; Maheshwari A; Vaidakis D; Bhattacharya S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 11(11):CD006606. PubMed ID: 30480769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early pregnancy outcomes of IVF cycles using donor versus partner sperm: analysis of 1 376 454 cycles recorded by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (1991-2016).
Allen C; McLernon D; Bhattacharya S; Maheshwari A
Hum Reprod; 2023 Jun; 38(6):1194-1201. PubMed ID: 36961939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in-vitro fertilisation in couples with infertility in whom the male partner has normal total sperm count and motility: an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Dang VQ; Vuong LN; Luu TM; Pham TD; Ho TM; Ha AN; Truong BT; Phan AK; Nguyen DP; Pham TN; Pham QT; Wang R; Norman RJ; Mol BW
Lancet; 2021 Apr; 397(10284):1554-1563. PubMed ID: 33894833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Higher clinical pregnancy rate with in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in treatment of non-male factor infertility: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Abbas AM; Hussein RS; Elsenity MA; Samaha II; El Etriby KA; Abd El-Ghany MF; Khalifa MA; Abdelrheem SS; Ahmed AA; Khodry MM
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 49(6):101706. PubMed ID: 32018045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Twenty years of in vitro fertilization: realization and questions for the future].
van Steirteghem A
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2001; 63(3):193-240; discussion 240-1. PubMed ID: 11499344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study.
Koedooder R; Singer M; Schoenmakers S; Savelkoul PHM; Morré SA; de Jonge JD; Poort L; Cuypers WJSS; Beckers NGM; Broekmans FJM; Cohlen BJ; den Hartog JE; Fleischer K; Lambalk CB; Smeenk JMJS; Budding AE; Laven JSE
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1042-1054. PubMed ID: 31119299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
