175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27891652)
21. Comparison of Prediction Model Performance Updating Protocols: Using a Data-Driven Testing Procedure to Guide Updating.
Davis SE; Greevy RA; Lasko TA; Walsh CG; Matheny ME
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2019; 2019():1002-1010. PubMed ID: 32308897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Semi-varying coefficient multinomial logistic regression for disease progression risk prediction.
Ke Y; Fu B; Zhang W
Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(26):4764-4778. PubMed ID: 27397539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prediction models for clustered data: comparison of a random intercept and standard regression model.
Bouwmeester W; Twisk JW; Kappen TH; van Klei WA; Moons KG; Vergouwe Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Feb; 13():19. PubMed ID: 23414436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing calibration of multinomial risk prediction models.
Van Hoorde K; Vergouwe Y; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Steyerberg EW; Van Calster B
Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(15):2585-96. PubMed ID: 24549725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Overfitting, generalization, and MSE in class probability estimation with high-dimensional data.
Kim KI; Simon R
Biom J; 2014 Mar; 56(2):256-69. PubMed ID: 24338793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients.
Janssen KJ; Moons KG; Kalkman CJ; Grobbee DE; Vergouwe Y
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18083464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Calibrating machine learning approaches for probability estimation: A comprehensive comparison.
Ojeda FM; Jansen ML; Thiéry A; Blankenberg S; Weimar C; Schmid M; Ziegler A
Stat Med; 2023 Dec; 42(29):5451-5478. PubMed ID: 37849356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Penalized Regression Methods With Modified Cross-Validation and Bootstrap Tuning Produce Better Prediction Models.
Pavlou M; Omar RZ; Ambler G
Biom J; 2024 Jul; 66(5):e202300245. PubMed ID: 38922968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Simplified estimates of the probability of death after burn injuries: extending and updating the baux score.
Osler T; Glance LG; Hosmer DW
J Trauma; 2010 Mar; 68(3):690-7. PubMed ID: 20038856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Discrimination slope and integrated discrimination improvement - properties, relationships and impact of calibration.
Pencina MJ; Fine JP; D'Agostino RB
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(28):4482-4490. PubMed ID: 27699818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bayesian logistic regression for online recalibration and revision of risk prediction models with performance guarantees.
Feng J; Gossmann A; Sahiner B; Pirracchio R
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2022 Apr; 29(5):841-852. PubMed ID: 35022756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dynamic updating of clinical survival prediction models in a changing environment.
Tanner KT; Keogh RH; Coupland CAC; Hippisley-Cox J; Diaz-Ordaz K
Diagn Progn Res; 2023 Dec; 7(1):24. PubMed ID: 38082429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluating space-time models for short-term cancer mortality risk predictions in small areas.
Etxeberria J; Goicoa T; Ugarte MD; Militino AF
Biom J; 2014 May; 56(3):383-402. PubMed ID: 24301220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Exact two-sample inference with missing data.
Cheung YK
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):524-31. PubMed ID: 16011700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Performance of Firth-and logF-type penalized methods in risk prediction for small or sparse binary data.
Rahman MS; Sultana M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):33. PubMed ID: 28231767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adaptation of clinical prediction models for application in local settings.
Kappen TH; Vergouwe Y; van Klei WA; van Wolfswinkel L; Kalkman CJ; Moons KG
Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(3):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22427369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Testing effect of a drug using multiple nested models for the dose-response.
Baayen C; Hougaard P; Pipper CB
Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):417-27. PubMed ID: 25660353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Validation of a prognostic score for early mortality in severe head injury cases.
Gómez PA; de-la-Cruz J; Lora D; Jiménez-Roldán L; Rodríguez-Boto G; Sarabia R; Sahuquillo J; Lastra R; Morera J; Lazo E; Dominguez J; Ibañez J; Brell M; de-la-Lama A; Lobato RD; Lagares A
J Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 121(6):1314-22. PubMed ID: 25237737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. FDR control with pseudo-gatekeeping based on a possibly data driven order of the hypotheses.
Farcomeni A; Finos L
Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):606-13. PubMed ID: 23844579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension.
Genders TS; Steyerberg EW; Alkadhi H; Leschka S; Desbiolles L; Nieman K; Galema TW; Meijboom WB; Mollet NR; de Feyter PJ; Cademartiri F; Maffei E; Dewey M; Zimmermann E; Laule M; Pugliese F; Barbagallo R; Sinitsyn V; Bogaert J; Goetschalckx K; Schoepf UJ; Rowe GW; Schuijf JD; Bax JJ; de Graaf FR; Knuuti J; Kajander S; van Mieghem CA; Meijs MF; Cramer MJ; Gopalan D; Feuchtner G; Friedrich G; Krestin GP; Hunink MG;
Eur Heart J; 2011 Jun; 32(11):1316-30. PubMed ID: 21367834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
