These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27891787)
1. Evaluation of the Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies: Thirty-five years of surveillance. Nembhard WN; Bower C Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2016 Nov; 106(11):894-904. PubMed ID: 27891787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Texas Birth Defects Registry: an active surveillance system. Miller E Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):787-92. PubMed ID: 17094140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age range for inclusion affects ascertainment by birth defects registers. Gibson CS; Scott H; Haan E; Scheil W Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2016 Sep; 106(9):761-6. PubMed ID: 27324669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs? Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York State using hospital discharge data. Wang Y; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross PK; Druschel CM; Hwang SA Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):663-8. PubMed ID: 16240383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and implementation of the first national data quality standards for population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States. Anderka M; Mai CT; Romitti PA; Copeland G; Isenburg J; Feldkamp ML; Krikov S; Rickard R; Olney RS; Canfield MA; Stanton C; Mosley B; Kirby RS BMC Public Health; 2015 Sep; 15():925. PubMed ID: 26386816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Accuracy of Hospital Discharge Diagnosis Codes for Major Birth Defects: Evaluation of a Statewide Registry With Passive Case Ascertainment. Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Sampat D; Anjohrin SB; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS J Public Health Manag Pract; 2016; 22(3):E9-E19. PubMed ID: 26125231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of congenital malformations surveillance in New York State: an application of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems. Sekhobo JP; Druschel CM Public Health Rep; 2001; 116(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 12037258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating Difficult Decisions in Public Health Surveillance: Striking the Right Balance between Timeliness and Completeness. Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Anjohrin SB; Rutkowski RE; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS J Registry Manag; 2015; 42(2):48-61. PubMed ID: 26360106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program: 35 years of birth defects surveillance at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Correa-Villaseñor A; Cragan J; Kucik J; O'Leary L; Siffel C; Williams L Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):617-24. PubMed ID: 14703783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation studies from the Western Australian Congenital Malformations Registry. Bower C; Forbes R; Ryan A; Rudy E Community Health Stud; 1990; 14(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 2253463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Registry data quality improvement by identifying discrepancies between assigned codes and text descriptions of birth defects. Richardson SD; Fox DJ; Wittman B J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 24625769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relative contribution of data sources to a birth defects registry utilizing passive multisource ascertainment methods: does a smaller birth defects case ascertainment net lead to overall or disproportionate loss? Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Block S; Bailey M; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS J Registry Manag; 2011; 38(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 22097703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age at diagnosis of birth defects. Bower C; Rudy E; Callaghan A; Quick J; Nassar N Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2010 Apr; 88(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 20213697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Congenital anomaly surveillance in England--ascertainment deficiencies in the national system. Boyd PA; Armstrong B; Dolk H; Botting B; Pattenden S; Abramsky L; Rankin J; Vrijheid M; Wellesley D BMJ; 2005 Jan; 330(7481):27. PubMed ID: 15561730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence of birth defects in an Arctic Russian setting from 1973 to 2011: a register-based study. Postoev VA; Nieboer E; Grjibovski AM; Odland JØ Reprod Health; 2015 Jan; 12():3. PubMed ID: 25577202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using active birth defects surveillance programs to supplement data on fetal death reports: improving surveillance data on stillbirths. Duke W; Williams L; Correa A Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2008 Nov; 82(11):799-804. PubMed ID: 18985684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring the potential to use data linkage for investigating the relationship between birth defects and prenatal alcohol exposure. O'Leary CM; Elliott EJ; Nassar N; Bower C Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2013 Jul; 97(7):497-504. PubMed ID: 23873815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Collaborating with consumers: the key to achieving statutory notification for birth defects and cerebral palsy in Western Australia. Bower C; McKenzie A; Watson L; Charles A J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 23778692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Registry to referral: using birth defects registries to refer infants and toddlers for early intervention services. Farel AM; Meyer RE; Hicken M; Edmonds LD Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):647-50. PubMed ID: 14703788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]