158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27891787)
1. Evaluation of the Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies: Thirty-five years of surveillance.
Nembhard WN; Bower C
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2016 Nov; 106(11):894-904. PubMed ID: 27891787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Texas Birth Defects Registry: an active surveillance system.
Miller E
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):787-92. PubMed ID: 17094140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age range for inclusion affects ascertainment by birth defects registers.
Gibson CS; Scott H; Haan E; Scheil W
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2016 Sep; 106(9):761-6. PubMed ID: 27324669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs?
Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York State using hospital discharge data.
Wang Y; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross PK; Druschel CM; Hwang SA
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):663-8. PubMed ID: 16240383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and implementation of the first national data quality standards for population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States.
Anderka M; Mai CT; Romitti PA; Copeland G; Isenburg J; Feldkamp ML; Krikov S; Rickard R; Olney RS; Canfield MA; Stanton C; Mosley B; Kirby RS
BMC Public Health; 2015 Sep; 15():925. PubMed ID: 26386816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Accuracy of Hospital Discharge Diagnosis Codes for Major Birth Defects: Evaluation of a Statewide Registry With Passive Case Ascertainment.
Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Sampat D; Anjohrin SB; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2016; 22(3):E9-E19. PubMed ID: 26125231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of congenital malformations surveillance in New York State: an application of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems.
Sekhobo JP; Druschel CM
Public Health Rep; 2001; 116(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 12037258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating Difficult Decisions in Public Health Surveillance: Striking the Right Balance between Timeliness and Completeness.
Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Anjohrin SB; Rutkowski RE; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS
J Registry Manag; 2015; 42(2):48-61. PubMed ID: 26360106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program: 35 years of birth defects surveillance at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Correa-Villaseñor A; Cragan J; Kucik J; O'Leary L; Siffel C; Williams L
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):617-24. PubMed ID: 14703783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation studies from the Western Australian Congenital Malformations Registry.
Bower C; Forbes R; Ryan A; Rudy E
Community Health Stud; 1990; 14(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 2253463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Registry data quality improvement by identifying discrepancies between assigned codes and text descriptions of birth defects.
Richardson SD; Fox DJ; Wittman B
J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 24625769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relative contribution of data sources to a birth defects registry utilizing passive multisource ascertainment methods: does a smaller birth defects case ascertainment net lead to overall or disproportionate loss?
Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Block S; Bailey M; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS
J Registry Manag; 2011; 38(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 22097703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age at diagnosis of birth defects.
Bower C; Rudy E; Callaghan A; Quick J; Nassar N
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2010 Apr; 88(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 20213697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Congenital anomaly surveillance in England--ascertainment deficiencies in the national system.
Boyd PA; Armstrong B; Dolk H; Botting B; Pattenden S; Abramsky L; Rankin J; Vrijheid M; Wellesley D
BMJ; 2005 Jan; 330(7481):27. PubMed ID: 15561730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence of birth defects in an Arctic Russian setting from 1973 to 2011: a register-based study.
Postoev VA; Nieboer E; Grjibovski AM; Odland JØ
Reprod Health; 2015 Jan; 12():3. PubMed ID: 25577202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using active birth defects surveillance programs to supplement data on fetal death reports: improving surveillance data on stillbirths.
Duke W; Williams L; Correa A
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2008 Nov; 82(11):799-804. PubMed ID: 18985684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring the potential to use data linkage for investigating the relationship between birth defects and prenatal alcohol exposure.
O'Leary CM; Elliott EJ; Nassar N; Bower C
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2013 Jul; 97(7):497-504. PubMed ID: 23873815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Collaborating with consumers: the key to achieving statutory notification for birth defects and cerebral palsy in Western Australia.
Bower C; McKenzie A; Watson L; Charles A
J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 23778692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Registry to referral: using birth defects registries to refer infants and toddlers for early intervention services.
Farel AM; Meyer RE; Hicken M; Edmonds LD
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):647-50. PubMed ID: 14703788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
