These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27892839)

  • 1. Influence of Adhesive Type and Placement Technique on Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Composite Restorations.
    Costa T; Rezende M; Sakamoto A; Bittencourt B; Dalzochio P; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):143-154. PubMed ID: 27892839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Rezende M; Gutierrez MF; Costa TF; Armas-Vega A; Reis A
    J Dent; 2019 Jun; 85():93-102. PubMed ID: 31100332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 5-year clinical performance of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Loguercio AD; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Gutierrez MF; Gonzalez MI; Reis A; Heintze SD
    Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 37839995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez IV; Fuentes S; Reis A; Muñoz MA
    J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():60-69. PubMed ID: 28962842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical performance of posterior restorations using a universal adhesive over moist and dry dentin: A 36-month double-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Ñaupari-Villasante R; Falconi-Páez C; Castro AS; Gutiérrez MF; Mendez-Bauer ML; Aliaga P; Dávila-Sánchez A; Arrais C; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    J Dent; 2024 Aug; 147():105080. PubMed ID: 38788919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of adhesive strategy on clinical parameters in cervical restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schroeder M; Correa IC; Bauer J; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():36-53. PubMed ID: 28495559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postoperative sensitivity in posterior resin composite restorations with prior application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing solution: A randomized clinical trial.
    de Oliveira ILM; Hanzen TA; de Paula AM; Perdigão J; Montes MAJR; Loguercio AD; Monteiro GQM
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103918. PubMed ID: 34879245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical time and postoperative sensitivity after use of bulk-fill (syringe and capsule) vs. incremental filling composites: a randomized clinical trial.
    Tardem C; Albuquerque EG; Lopes LS; Marins SS; Calazans FS; Poubel LA; Barcelos R; Barceleiro MO
    Braz Oral Res; 2019 Sep; 33(0):e089. PubMed ID: 31531552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dentin moisture does not influence postoperative sensitivity in posterior restorations: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Castro AS; Maran BM; Gutiérrez MF; Martini EC; Dreweck FD; Mendez-Bauer L; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Am J Dent; 2020 Aug; 33(4):206-212. PubMed ID: 32794396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.
    Afifi SMH; Haridy MF; Farid MR
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Jul; 7(14):2335-2342. PubMed ID: 31592052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.
    Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 2-Year Randomized Clinical Trial of Three Bonding Techniques in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions.
    Pappa E; Gkavela G; Sampri I; Masouras K; Rahiotis C; Kakaboura A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Jun; 60(6):. PubMed ID: 38929622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite--a randomized clinical trial.
    Burrow MF; Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Messer HH
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(6):648-55. PubMed ID: 19953773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Dentin Moisture in Posterior Restorations Performed with Universal Adhesive: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Castro AS; Maran BM; Gutierrez MF; Chemin K; Mendez-Bauer ML; Bermúdez JP; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2022 Mar; 47(2):E91-E105. PubMed ID: 35405005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of Class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1371-9. PubMed ID: 25359327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
    Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postoperative sensitivity of self etch versus total etch adhesive.
    Yousaf A; Aman N; Manzoor MA; Shah JA; Dilrasheed
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Jun; 24(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 24953909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.