These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27893273)

  • 1. Spontaneous rereading within sentences: Eye movement control and visual sampling.
    White SJ; Lantz LM; Paterson KB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):395-413. PubMed ID: 27893273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reading sentences of uniform word length: Evidence for the adaptation of the preferred saccade length during reading.
    Cutter MG; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1895-1911. PubMed ID: 28406688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements.
    Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB; White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1714-1729. PubMed ID: 29672115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readers can identify the meanings of words without looking at them: Evidence from regressive eye movements.
    Schotter ER; Fennell AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1697-1704. PubMed ID: 31512087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):519-528. PubMed ID: 27418260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm.
    Reingold EM; Sheridan H; Meadmore KL; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27643527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oculomotor and linguistic processing effects in reading dynamic horizontally scrolling text.
    Harvey H; Godwin HJ; Fitzsimmons G; Liversedge SP; Walker R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):518-536. PubMed ID: 28080114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spelling ability selectively predicts the magnitude of disruption in unspaced text reading.
    Veldre A; Drieghe D; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1612-1628. PubMed ID: 28414501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.
    Zang C; Fu Y; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1831-1841. PubMed ID: 30475051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The function of regressions in reading: backward eye movements allow rereading.
    Booth RW; Weger UW
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jan; 41(1):82-97. PubMed ID: 22886737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eye movement control in Chinese reading: A cross-sectional study.
    Yan M; Pan J; Kliegl R
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Nov; 55(11):2275-2285. PubMed ID: 31535894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Capitalization interacts with syntactic complexity.
    Cutter MG; Martin AE; Sturt P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1146-1164. PubMed ID: 31621360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of adult aging on letter position coding in reading: Evidence from eye movements.
    Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB; White SJ
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Jun; 34(4):598-612. PubMed ID: 30920243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of hyperlinks on reading text.
    Fitzsimmons G; Weal MJ; Drieghe D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0210900. PubMed ID: 30726235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An eye movement corpus study of the age-of-acquisition effect.
    Dirix N; Duyck W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1915-1921. PubMed ID: 28116701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cortical control of eye movements in natural reading: Evidence from MVPA.
    Goold JE; Choi W; Henderson JM
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 237(12):3099-3107. PubMed ID: 31541285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is semantic preview benefit due to relatedness or plausibility?
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 26752734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Background Speech Effects on Sentence Processing during Reading: An Eye Movement Study.
    Hyönä J; Ekholm M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152133. PubMed ID: 27003410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regressions during reading: The cost depends on the cause.
    Eskenazi MA; Folk JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1211-1216. PubMed ID: 27873185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.