These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27893791)

  • 1. Toward a Nonspeech Test of Auditory Cognition: Semantic Context Effects in Environmental Sound Identification in Adults of Varying Age and Hearing Abilities.
    Shafiro V; Sheft S; Norris M; Spanos G; Radasevich K; Formsma P; Gygi B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0167030. PubMed ID: 27893791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.
    Shafiro V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Relationship Between Environmental Sound Awareness and Speech Recognition Skills in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users.
    Harris MS; Boyce L; Pisoni DB; Shafiro V; Moberly AC
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):e308-e314. PubMed ID: 28731964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution.
    Shafiro V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):401-20. PubMed ID: 18344871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Smulders YE; van Zon A; Stegeman I; Rinia AB; Van Zanten GA; Stokroos RJ; Hendrice N; Free RH; Maat B; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ; Mylanus EA; Huinck WJ; Smit AL; Topsakal V; Tange RA; Grolman W
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 142(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 26796630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Can We Learn about Auditory Processing from Adult Hearing Questionnaires?
    Bamiou DE; Iliadou VV; Zanchetta S; Spyridakou C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):824-37. PubMed ID: 26554488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of nonlinguistic sounds.
    Inverso Y; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):505-14. PubMed ID: 20588119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive factors contribute to speech perception in cochlear-implant users and age-matched normal-hearing listeners under vocoded conditions.
    O'Neill ER; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):195. PubMed ID: 31370651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age affects responses on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) by adults with minimal audiometric loss.
    Banh J; Singh G; Pichora-Fuller MK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):81-91; quiz 139-40. PubMed ID: 22353676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.
    Glyde H; Cameron S; Dillon H; Hickson L; Seeto M
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 22941406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental sound training in cochlear implant users.
    Shafiro V; Sheft S; Kuvadia S; Gygi B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):509-19. PubMed ID: 25633579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.
    Jones H; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25385244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of aging and interaural delay on the detection of a break in the interaural correlation between two sounds.
    Li L; Huang J; Wu X; Qi JG; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 19194287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of environmental sounds by experienced cochlear implant patients.
    Shafiro V; Gygi B; Cheng MY; Vachhani J; Mulvey M
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):511-23. PubMed ID: 21248643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Turning down the noise: the benefit of musical training on the aging auditory brain.
    Alain C; Zendel BR; Hutka S; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():162-73. PubMed ID: 23831039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.