375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27893791)
1. Toward a Nonspeech Test of Auditory Cognition: Semantic Context Effects in Environmental Sound Identification in Adults of Varying Age and Hearing Abilities.
Shafiro V; Sheft S; Norris M; Spanos G; Radasevich K; Formsma P; Gygi B
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0167030. PubMed ID: 27893791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.
Shafiro V
Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Relationship Between Environmental Sound Awareness and Speech Recognition Skills in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users.
Harris MS; Boyce L; Pisoni DB; Shafiro V; Moberly AC
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):e308-e314. PubMed ID: 28731964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution.
Shafiro V
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):401-20. PubMed ID: 18344871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Smulders YE; van Zon A; Stegeman I; Rinia AB; Van Zanten GA; Stokroos RJ; Hendrice N; Free RH; Maat B; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ; Mylanus EA; Huinck WJ; Smit AL; Topsakal V; Tange RA; Grolman W
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 142(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 26796630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What Can We Learn about Auditory Processing from Adult Hearing Questionnaires?
Bamiou DE; Iliadou VV; Zanchetta S; Spyridakou C
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):824-37. PubMed ID: 26554488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of nonlinguistic sounds.
Inverso Y; Limb CJ
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):505-14. PubMed ID: 20588119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognitive factors contribute to speech perception in cochlear-implant users and age-matched normal-hearing listeners under vocoded conditions.
O'Neill ER; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):195. PubMed ID: 31370651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Age affects responses on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) by adults with minimal audiometric loss.
Banh J; Singh G; Pichora-Fuller MK
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):81-91; quiz 139-40. PubMed ID: 22353676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.
Glyde H; Cameron S; Dillon H; Hickson L; Seeto M
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 22941406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Environmental sound training in cochlear implant users.
Shafiro V; Sheft S; Kuvadia S; Gygi B
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):509-19. PubMed ID: 25633579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.
Jones H; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25385244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of aging and interaural delay on the detection of a break in the interaural correlation between two sounds.
Li L; Huang J; Wu X; Qi JG; Schneider BA
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 19194287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of environmental sounds by experienced cochlear implant patients.
Shafiro V; Gygi B; Cheng MY; Vachhani J; Mulvey M
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):511-23. PubMed ID: 21248643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Turning down the noise: the benefit of musical training on the aging auditory brain.
Alain C; Zendel BR; Hutka S; Bidelman GM
Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():162-73. PubMed ID: 23831039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
