These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27894527)
1. Accuracy and mechanical properties of orthodontic models printed 3-dimensionally from calcium sulfate before and after various postprinting treatments. Ledingham AD; English JD; Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; Ontiveros JC; Kasper FK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Dec; 150(6):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 27894527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structure, Properties, and In Vitro Behavior of Heat-Treated Calcium Sulfate Scaffolds Fabricated by 3D Printing. Asadi-Eydivand M; Solati-Hashjin M; Shafiei SS; Mohammadi S; Hafezi M; Abu Osman NA PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151216. PubMed ID: 26999789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of print layer height and printer type on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed orthodontic models. Favero CS; English JD; Cozad BE; Wirthlin JO; Short MM; Kasper FK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):557-565. PubMed ID: 28962741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed models. Loflin WA; English JD; Borders C; Harris LM; Moon A; Holland JN; Kasper FK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):283-289. PubMed ID: 31375239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of build angle and layer height on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models. Ko J; Bloomstein RD; Briss D; Holland JN; Morsy HM; Kasper FK; Huang W Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Sep; 160(3):451-458.e2. PubMed ID: 34456006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. Alharbi N; Osman R; Wismeijer D J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):760-7. PubMed ID: 26803175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models. Camardella LT; Vilella OV; van Hezel MM; Breuning KH J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 28361165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the dimensional accuracy of thermoformed appliances taken from 3D printed models with varied shell thicknesses: An in vitro study. Kenning KB; Risinger DC; English JD; Cozad BE; Harris LM; Ontiveros JC; Kasper FK Int Orthod; 2021 Mar; 19(1):137-146. PubMed ID: 33551327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. Keating AP; Knox J; Bibb R; Zhurov AI J Orthod; 2008 Sep; 35(3):191-201; discussion 175. PubMed ID: 18809782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface detail, compressive strength, and dimensional accuracy of gypsum casts after repeated immersion in hypochlorite solution. Abdullah MA J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):462-8. PubMed ID: 16765160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of automated grading of digital orthodontic models and hand grading of 3-dimensionally printed models. Scott JD; English JD; Cozad BE; Borders CL; Harris LM; Moon AL; Kasper FK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):886-890. PubMed ID: 31153510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases. Camardella LT; de Vasconcellos Vilella O; Breuning H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1178-1187. PubMed ID: 28554463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Die spacer thickness reproduction for central incisor crown fabrication with combined computer-aided design and 3D printing technology: an in vitro study. Hoang LN; Thompson GA; Cho SH; Berzins DW; Ahn KW J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):398-404. PubMed ID: 25794915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of print orientation and duration of ultraviolet curing on the dimensional accuracy of a 3-dimensionally printed orthodontic clear aligner design. McCarty MC; Chen SJ; English JD; Kasper F Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Dec; 158(6):889-897. PubMed ID: 33250102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy. Zhang ZC; Li PL; Chu FT; Shen G J Orofac Orthop; 2019 Jul; 80(4):194-204. PubMed ID: 31172199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards 3D printed multifunctional immobilization for proton therapy: Initial materials characterization. Michiels S; D'Hollander A; Lammens N; Kersemans M; Zhang G; Denis JM; Poels K; Sterpin E; Nuyts S; Haustermans K; Depuydt T Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5392. PubMed ID: 27782703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs. Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical and geometric properties of thermoformed and 3D printed clear dental aligners. Jindal P; Juneja M; Siena FL; Bajaj D; Breedon P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Nov; 156(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 31677678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. Hazeveld A; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 24373661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Precision of 3D-printed splints with different dental model offsets. Ye N; Wu T; Dong T; Yuan L; Fang B; Xia L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 May; 155(5):733-738. PubMed ID: 31053289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]