These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27895443)
1. The validation and inter-rater reliability of the Serbian translation of the Richmond agitation and sedation scale in post anesthesia care unit patients. Stasevic K; Stasevic M; Jankovic S; Djukic D; Dutina A; Grbic I Hippokratia; 2016; 20(1):50-54. PubMed ID: 27895443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). Ely EW; Truman B; Shintani A; Thomason JW; Wheeler AP; Gordon S; Francis J; Speroff T; Gautam S; Margolin R; Sessler CN; Dittus RS; Bernard GR JAMA; 2003 Jun; 289(22):2983-91. PubMed ID: 12799407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: translation and reliability testing in a Swedish intensive care unit. Almgren M; Lundmark M; Samuelson K Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2010 Jul; 54(6):729-35. PubMed ID: 20002362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Sessler CN; Gosnell MS; Grap MJ; Brophy GM; O'Neal PV; Keane KA; Tesoro EP; Elswick RK Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2002 Nov; 166(10):1338-44. PubMed ID: 12421743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and Reliability of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients: A Multicenter Study. Tapia R; López-Herce J; Arias Á; Del Castillo J; Mencía S Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():795487. PubMed ID: 35047463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) in critically ill children. Kerson AG; DeMaria R; Mauer E; Joyce C; Gerber LM; Greenwald BM; Silver G; Traube C J Intensive Care; 2016; 4():65. PubMed ID: 27800163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity, reliability and applicability of Portuguese versions of sedation-agitation scales among critically ill patients. Nassar Junior AP; Pires Neto RC; de Figueiredo WB; Park M Sao Paulo Med J; 2008 Jul; 126(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 18853029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Appropriateness and reliability testing of the modified Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in Spanish patients with advanced cancer. Benítez-Rosario MA; Castillo-Padrós M; Garrido-Bernet B; González-Guillermo T; Martínez-Castillo LP; González A; J Pain Symptom Manage; 2013 Jun; 45(6):1112-9. PubMed ID: 23726218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ramsay Sedation Scale and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale: A Cross-sectional Study. Rasheed AM; Amirah MF; Abdallah M; P J P; Issa M; Alharthy A Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2019; 38(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 30702478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multicenter International Cohort Validation of a Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Using the Richmond Agitation-sedation Scale. Rakhit S; Wang L; Lindsell CJ; Hosay MA; Stewart JW; Owen GD; Frutos-Vivar F; Pen Uelas O; Esteban AS; Anzueto AR; Raymondos K; Rios F; Thille AW; Gonza Lez M; Du B; Maggiore SM; Matamis D; Abroug F; Amin P; Zeggwagh AA; Ely EW; Vasilevskis EE; Patel MB Ann Surg; 2022 Aug; 276(2):e114-e119. PubMed ID: 33201122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The correlation among the Ramsay sedation scale, Richmond agitation sedation scale and Riker sedation agitation scale during midazolam-remifentanil sedation]. Namigar T; Serap K; Esra AT; Özgül O; Can ÖA; Aysel A; Achmet A Rev Bras Anestesiol; 2017; 67(4):347-354. PubMed ID: 28412050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison and agreement between the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale in evaluating patients' eligibility for delirium assessment in the ICU. Khan BA; Guzman O; Campbell NL; Walroth T; Tricker JL; Hui SL; Perkins A; Zawahiri M; Buckley JD; Farber MO; Ely EW; Boustani MA Chest; 2012 Jul; 142(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 22539644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity and reliability of an intuitive conscious sedation scoring tool: the nursing instrument for the communication of sedation. Mirski MA; LeDroux SN; Lewin JJ; Thompson CB; Mirski KT; Griswold M Crit Care Med; 2010 Aug; 38(8):1674-84. PubMed ID: 20581667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of a Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. Vasilevskis EE; Pandharipande PP; Graves AJ; Shintani A; Tsuruta R; Ely EW; Girard TD Crit Care Med; 2016 Jan; 44(1):138-46. PubMed ID: 26457749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale modified for palliative care inpatients (RASS-PAL): a pilot study exploring validity and feasibility in clinical practice. Bush SH; Grassau PA; Yarmo MN; Zhang T; Zinkie SJ; Pereira JL BMC Palliat Care; 2014 Mar; 13(1):17. PubMed ID: 24684942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-modal Educational Curriculum to Improve Richmond Agitation-sedation Scale Inter-rater Reliability in Pediatric Patients. Kihlstrom MJ; Edge AP; Cherry KM; Zarick PJ; Beck SD; Boyd JM Pediatr Qual Saf; 2018; 3(5):e096. PubMed ID: 30584623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of using Richmond agitation and sedation scale on hospital stay, ventilator dependence, and mortality rate in ICU inpatients: a randomised clinical trial. Rashidi M; Molavynejad S; Javadi N; Adineh M; Sharhani A; Poursangbur T J Res Nurs; 2020 Dec; 25(8):734-746. PubMed ID: 34394697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Validation of the french translated Richmond vigilance-agitation scale]. Chanques G; Jaber S; Barbotte E; Verdier R; Henriette K; Lefrant JY; Eledjam JJ Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2006 Jul; 25(7):696-701. PubMed ID: 16698231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Palliative sedation: reliability and validity of sedation scales. Arevalo JJ; Brinkkemper T; van der Heide A; Rietjens JA; Ribbe M; Deliens L; Loer SA; Zuurmond WW; Perez RS; J Pain Symptom Manage; 2012 Nov; 44(5):704-14. PubMed ID: 22819440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating pain, sedation, and delirium in the neurologically critically ill-feasibility and reliability of standardized tools: a multi-institutional study. Yu A; Teitelbaum J; Scott J; Gesin G; Russell B; Huynh T; Skrobik Y Crit Care Med; 2013 Aug; 41(8):2002-7. PubMed ID: 23863231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]