These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27896472)
1. Safety and perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic sacropexy: a systematic analysis and a comparison with laparoscopic hysterectomy. Joukhadar R; Baum S; Radosa J; Gerlinger C; Hamza A; Juhasz-Böss I; Solomayer EF Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 295(3):641-649. PubMed ID: 27896472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of laparoscopic sacropexy in women over 70: A comparative study. Boudy AS; Thubert T; Vinchant M; Hermieu JF; Villefranque V; Deffieux X Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():178-183. PubMed ID: 27865942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of laparoscopic management of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse. Martín Del Olmo JC; Toledano M; Martín Esteban ML; Montenegro MA; Gómez JR; Concejo P; Rodríguez de Castro M; Del Rio F Surg Endosc; 2019 Apr; 33(4):1075-1079. PubMed ID: 29998390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient satisfaction after laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: outcome report of a continuous series of 417 patients. Veit-Rubin N; Dubuisson JB; Gayet-Ageron A; Lange S; Eperon I; Dubuisson J Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1685-1693. PubMed ID: 28417156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic assessment of surgical complications in laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse. Mothes AR; Radosa MP; Runnebaum IB Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():228-32. PubMed ID: 26451889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis. De Gouveia De Sa M; Claydon LS; Whitlow B; Dolcet Artahona MA Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 26249235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic sacropexy on one hundred fifteen cases. Serbetcioglu GC; Simsek SY; Alemdaroglu S; Aytac PC; Kalayci H; Celik H J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Sep; 49(7):101795. PubMed ID: 32474191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Novel Operative Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Utilizing a MRI-Visible Mesh Implant: Safety and Outcome of Modified Laparoscopic Bilateral Sacropexy. Joukhadar R; Meyberg-Solomayer G; Hamza A; Radosa J; Bader W; Barski D; Ismaeel F; Schneider G; Solomayer E; Baum S Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():860784. PubMed ID: 25961042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative adverse events associated with pelvic organ prolapse repair by nerve-preserving sacropexy: an analysis of 768 cases over a 10-year period. Kavvadias T; Schoenfisch B; Huebner M; Brucker SY; Wallwiener D; Reisenauer C Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Aug; 298(2):353-361. PubMed ID: 29931524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic and robotic sacropexy: retrospective review of learning curve experiences and follow-up. Pilka R; Gágyor D; Študentová M; Neubert D; Dzvinčuk P Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 28925269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transvaginal treatment of anterior and apical genital prolapses using an Ultra lightweight mesh: Restorelle Ferry P; Bertherat P; Gauthier A; Villet R; Del Piano F; Hamid D; Fernandez H; Broux PL; Salet-Lizée D; Vincens E; Ntshaykolo P; Debodinance P; Pocholle P; Thirouard Y; de Tayrac R J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 47(9):443-449. PubMed ID: 29920380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy and subtotal hysterectomy plus cervicopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: A pilot study. Gracia M; Perelló M; Bataller E; Espuña M; Parellada M; Genís D; Balasch J; Carmona F Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Sep; 34(7):654-8. PubMed ID: 24975722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-center study for robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacropexies: a one-fits-all strategy for pelvic organ prolapse? Mach P; Kaufold C; Rusch P; Kimmig R; Buderath P Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Dec; 306(6):2009-2015. PubMed ID: 35974180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, and laparoscopic pectopexy for apical prolapse. Biler A; Ertas IE; Tosun G; Hortu I; Turkay U; Gultekin OE; Igci G Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(5):996-1004. PubMed ID: 30044591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse. Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function after abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Koroglu N; Aslan Cetin B; Akca A; Turan G; Temel Yuksel I; Safak Yıldırım I; Yetkin Yıldırım G Ginekol Pol; 2018; 89(10):553-557. PubMed ID: 30393843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nerve-Sparing Laparoscopic Colposacropexy Using a Percutaneous Surgical System: A Case Report. Romano F; Legge F; Scambia G; Guido M J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):536-537. PubMed ID: 27919731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension with uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective cohort study. Li C; Shu H; Dai Z Int J Surg; 2018 Jun; 54(Pt A):28-34. PubMed ID: 29673691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of laparoscopic techniques for apical organ prolapse repair - a systematic review of the literature. Szymczak P; Grzybowska ME; Wydra DG Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Nov; 38(8):2031-2050. PubMed ID: 31452267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]