78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27897036)
21. Angiomyolipoma: imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat.
Jinzaki M; Tanimoto A; Narimatsu Y; Ohkuma K; Kurata T; Shinmoto H; Hiramatsu K; Mukai M; Murai M
Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):497-502. PubMed ID: 9356635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. New radiologic classification of renal angiomyolipomas.
Song S; Park BK; Park JJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1835-1842. PubMed ID: 27666625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sonographic Features of Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images: Differentiating Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Cho KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 30040467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Small (<4 cm) renal mass: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma utilizing MR imaging.
Sasiwimonphan K; Takahashi N; Leibovich BC; Carter RE; Atwell TD; Kawashima A
Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 22344404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intensity ratio curve analysis of small renal masses on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Moriyama S; Yoshida S; Tanaka H; Tanaka H; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Saito K; Kihara K; Fujii Y
Int J Urol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):554-560. PubMed ID: 29577440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Findings of Fat-Poor Angiomyolipomas.
Potretzke AM; Potretzke TA; Bauman TM; Knight BA; Park AM; Mobley JM; Figenshau RS; Siegel CL
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):119-128. PubMed ID: 27897036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat: Can we make the diagnosis using CT and MRI?
Lim RS; Flood TA; McInnes MDF; Lavallee LT; Schieda N
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):542-553. PubMed ID: 28779401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Characterization of small (<4cm) solid renal masses by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: Current evidence and further development.
Schieda N; Lim RS; McInnes MDF; Thomassin I; Renard-Penna R; Tavolaro S; Cornelis FH
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018; 99(7-8):443-455. PubMed ID: 29606371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ten uncommon and unusual variants of renal angiomyolipoma (AML): radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Schieda N; Kielar AZ; Al Dandan O; McInnes MD; Flood TA
Clin Radiol; 2015 Feb; 70(2):206-20. PubMed ID: 25468637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The different faces of renal angiomyolipomas on radiologic imaging: a pictorial review.
Thiravit S; Teerasamit W; Thiravit P
Br J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 91(1084):20170533. PubMed ID: 29327940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Renal Angiomyolipoma: Radiologic Classification and Imaging Features According to the Amount of Fat.
Park BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):826-835. PubMed ID: 28726505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Renal angiomyolipoma: preoperative identification of atypical fat-poor AML.
Farrell C; Noyes SL; Tourojman M; Lane BR
Curr Urol Rep; 2015 Mar; 16(3):12. PubMed ID: 25677233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. CT imaging of solid renal masses: pitfalls and solutions.
Krishna S; Murray CA; McInnes MD; Chatelain R; Siddaiah M; Al-Dandan O; Narayanasamy S; Schieda N
Clin Radiol; 2017 Sep; 72(9):708-721. PubMed ID: 28592361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
