474 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27898367)
21. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Counterfactual simulations applied to SHRP2 crashes: The effect of driver behavior models on safety benefit estimations of intelligent safety systems.
Bärgman J; Boda CN; Dozza M
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():165-180. PubMed ID: 28315616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Field effectiveness of general motors advanced driver assistance and headlighting systems.
Leslie AJ; Kiefer RJ; Meitzner MR; Flannagan CA
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106275. PubMed ID: 34242861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effectiveness of lane departure warning systems-A reduction in real-world passenger car injury crashes.
Sternlund S; Strandroth J; Rizzi M; Lie A; Tingvall C
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Feb; 18(2):225-229. PubMed ID: 27624313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Market penetration of intersection AEB: Characterizing avoided and residual straight crossing path accidents.
Sander U; Lubbe N
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():178-188. PubMed ID: 29604516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Crash and injury prevention estimates for intersection driver assistance systems in left turn across path/opposite direction crashes in the United States.
Bareiss M; Scanlon J; Sherony R; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S133-S138. PubMed ID: 31381453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Comprehensive target populations for current active safety systems using national crash databases.
Kusano KD; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(7):753-61. PubMed ID: 24433115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intersection AEB implementation strategies for left turn across path crashes.
Sander U; Lubbe N; Pietzsch S
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S119-S125. PubMed ID: 31381448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Simulating Automated Emergency Braking with and without Torricelli Vacuum Emergency Braking for cyclists: Effect of brake deceleration and sensor field-of-view on accidents, injuries and fatalities.
Jeppsson H; Lubbe N
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105538. PubMed ID: 32470821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prospective assessment of the effectiveness of autonomous emergency braking in car-to-cyclist accidents in France.
Chajmowicz H; Saadé J; Cuny S
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S20-S25. PubMed ID: 31750740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Injury mitigation estimates for an intersection driver assistance system in straight crossing path crashes in the United States.
Scanlon JM; Sherony R; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S9-S17. PubMed ID: 28323447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to passenger cars.
Edwards M; Nathanson A; Wisch M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S173-82. PubMed ID: 25307384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems.
Spicer R; Vahabaghaie A; Bahouth G; Drees L; Martinez von Bülow R; Baur P
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S91-S95. PubMed ID: 30543454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantifying Vision Zero: Crash avoidance in rural and motorway accident scenarios by combination of ACC, AEB, and LKS projected to German accident occurrence.
Stark L; Düring M; Schoenawa S; Maschke JE; Do CM
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S126-S132. PubMed ID: 31381430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Potential Occupant Injury Reduction in Pre-Crash System Equipped Vehicles in the Striking Vehicle of Rear-end Crashes.
Kusano KD; Gabler HC
Ann Adv Automot Med; 2010; 54():203-14. PubMed ID: 21050603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of precrash velocity reduction on occupant response using a human body finite element model.
Guleyupoglu B; Schap J; Kusano KD; Gayzik FS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul; 18(5):508-514. PubMed ID: 28102701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. How can front crash prevention systems address more police-reported crashes in the United States?
Kidd DG; Teoh ER; Jermakian JS
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107199. PubMed ID: 37406545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of the effect of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) based on real-world crashes.
Piantini S; Aathresh VN; Savino G; Pierini M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S174-S180. PubMed ID: 36200698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Motorcycle active safety systems: Assessment of the function and applicability using a population-based crash data set.
Savino G; Pierini M; Fitzharris M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(4):406-412. PubMed ID: 31059290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
