These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27898915)

  • 1. Genetic and economic effects of the increase in female paternal filiations by parentage assignment in sheep and goat breeding programs.
    Raoul J; Palhière I; Astruc JM; Elsen JM
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3663-3683. PubMed ID: 27898915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential benefits of genomic selection on genetic gain of small ruminant breeding programs.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Elsen JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3644-57. PubMed ID: 23736059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a SNP panel dedicated to parentage assignment in French sheep populations.
    Tortereau F; Moreno CR; Tosser-Klopp G; Servin B; Raoul J
    BMC Genet; 2017 May; 18(1):50. PubMed ID: 28549462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing genetic gain, inbreeding, and bias attributable to different flock genetic means in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
    Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):526-35. PubMed ID: 18073281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heritability of ram mating success in multi-sire breeding situations.
    Juengel JL; Hickey SM; Clarke SM; Cullen NG; McEwan JC; Dodds KG
    Animal; 2019 May; 13(5):917-923. PubMed ID: 30345952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic evaluation of genomic selection in small ruminants: a sheep meat breeding program.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Lemarié S; Fugeray-Scarbel A; Elsen JM
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1033-41. PubMed ID: 26446712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A high throughput single nucleotide polymorphism multiplex assay for parentage assignment in New Zealand sheep.
    Clarke SM; Henry HM; Dodds KG; Jowett TW; Manley TR; Anderson RM; McEwan JC
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93392. PubMed ID: 24740141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The breeding structure for the small ruminant resources in India.
    Gowane GR; Akram N; Misra SS; Chopra A; Sharma RC; Kumar A
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2020 Jul; 52(4):1717-1724. PubMed ID: 31898023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic and economic benefits of selection based on performance recording and genotyping in lower tiers of multi-tiered sheep breeding schemes.
    Santos BF; van der Werf JH; Gibson JP; Byrne TJ; Amer PR
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):10. PubMed ID: 28095776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing female allocation to reproductive technologies considering merit, inbreeding and cost in nucleus breeding programmes with genomic selection.
    Granleese T; Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; van der Werf JHJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Mar; 136(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 30585664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic evaluation in the presence of uncertain additive relationships. I. Use of phenotypic information to ascertain paternity.
    Sapp RL; Zhang W; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2391-400. PubMed ID: 17504957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal mating strategies to manage a heterozygous advantage major gene in sheep.
    Raoul J; Palhière I; Astruc JM; Swan A; Elsen JM
    Animal; 2018 Mar; 12(3):454-463. PubMed ID: 28770690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the efficiency of alternative two-tier nucleus breeding systems designed to improve meat sheep in Kenya.
    Gicheha MG; Kosgey IS; Bebe BO; Kahi AK
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Aug; 123(4):247-57. PubMed ID: 16882091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic evaluation using parentage information from genetic markers.
    Dodds KG; Tate ML; Sise JA
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Oct; 83(10):2271-9. PubMed ID: 16160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of candidate sire number and sire relatedness on DNA polymorphism-based measures of exclusion probability and probability of unambiguous parentage.
    Sherman GB; Kachman SD; Hungerford LL; Rupp GP; Fox CP; Brown MD; Feuz BM; Holm TR
    Anim Genet; 2004 Jun; 35(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 15147394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three easy fixes for sire use can enhance genetic progress in community-based breeding programmes.
    Mueller JP; Getachew T; Rekik M; Rischkowsky B; Abate Z; Goshme S; Wale Y; Haile A
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2021 Nov; 138(6):719-730. PubMed ID: 34337791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-benefit evaluation of artificial insemination for genetic improvement of wool-producing sheep.
    Abbott KA
    Aust Vet J; 1994 Nov; 71(11):353-60. PubMed ID: 7726758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The levels of artificial insemination and missing sire information make genomic selection not always beneficial in meat sheep.
    Raoul J; Elsen JM
    Animal; 2021 Feb; 15(2):100040. PubMed ID: 33573971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.