205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27898927)
1. Effect of feeding strategy on environmental impacts of pig fattening in different contexts of production: evaluation through life cycle assessment.
Monteiro AN; Garcia-Launay F; Brossard L; Wilfart A; Dourmad JY
J Anim Sci; 2016 Nov; 94(11):4832-4847. PubMed ID: 27898927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production.
Andretta I; Hauschild L; Kipper M; Pires PGS; Pomar C
Animal; 2018 Sep; 12(9):1990-1998. PubMed ID: 29198226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment.
Dourmad JY; Ryschawy J; Trousson T; Bonneau M; Gonzàlez J; Houwers HW; Hviid M; Zimmer C; Nguyen TL; Morgensen L
Animal; 2014 Dec; 8(12):2027-37. PubMed ID: 25170767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modelling interactions between farmer practices and fattening pig performances with an individual-based model.
Cadéro A; Aubry A; Brossard L; Dourmad JY; Salaün Y; Garcia-Launay F
Animal; 2018 Jun; 12(6):1277-1286. PubMed ID: 29143701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variability in environmental impacts of Brazilian soybean according to crop production and transport scenarios.
da Silva VP; van der Werf HM; Spies A; Soares SR
J Environ Manage; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1831-9. PubMed ID: 20452717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accounting for uncertainty in the quantification of the environmental impacts of Canadian pig farming systems.
Mackenzie SG; Leinonen I; Ferguson N; Kyriazakis I
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):3130-43. PubMed ID: 26115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing environmental impacts of feed using multiobjective formulation: What benefits at the farm gate for pig and broiler production?
Méda B; Garcia-Launay F; Dusart L; Ponchant P; Espagnol S; Wilfart A
Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100024. PubMed ID: 33750548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of interactions between feeding practices, animal health and farm infrastructure on technical, economic and environmental performances of a pig-fattening unit.
Cadéro A; Aubry A; Dourmad JY; Salaün Y; Garcia-Launay F
Animal; 2020 Aug; 14(S2):s348-s359. PubMed ID: 32122427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment.
Mosnier E; van der Werf HM; Boissy J; Dourmad JY
Animal; 2011 Dec; 5(12):1972-83. PubMed ID: 22440474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Environmental Impacts and Their Association With Performance and Excretion Traits in Growing Pigs.
Monteiro ANTR; Brossard L; Gilbert H; Dourmad JY
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():677857. PubMed ID: 34235205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How can we improve the environmental sustainability of poultry production?
Leinonen I; Kyriazakis I
Proc Nutr Soc; 2016 Aug; 75(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 26935025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental impact of replacing soybean meal with rapeseed meal in diets of finishing pigs.
van Zanten HH; Bikker P; Mollenhorst H; Meerburg BG; de Boer IJ
Animal; 2015 Nov; 9(11):1866-74. PubMed ID: 26234347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eco-Friendly Feed Formulation and On-Farm Feed Production as Ways to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Without Consequences on Animal Performance.
de Quelen F; Brossard L; Wilfart A; Dourmad JY; Garcia-Launay F
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():689012. PubMed ID: 34295934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental impact of using specialty feed ingredients in swine and poultry production: A life cycle assessment.
Kebreab E; Liedke A; Caro D; Deimling S; Binder M; Finkbeiner M
J Anim Sci; 2016 Jun; 94(6):2664-81. PubMed ID: 27285941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating environmental impacts of selection for residual feed intake in pigs.
Soleimani T; Gilbert H
Animal; 2020 Dec; 14(12):2598-2608. PubMed ID: 32624079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The economic and environmental value of genetic improvements in fattening pigs: An integrated dynamic model approach.
Niemi JK; Sevón-Aimonen ML; Stygar AH; Partanen K
J Anim Sci; 2015 Aug; 93(8):4161-71. PubMed ID: 26440196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatialised fate factors for nitrate in catchments: modelling approach and implication for LCA results.
Basset-Mens C; Anibar L; Durand P; van der Werf HM
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Aug; 367(1):367-82. PubMed ID: 16488466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. β-Mannanase Supplementation as an Eco-Friendly Feed Strategy to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Feeding Programs.
Hickmann FMW; Andretta I; Létourneau-Montminy MP; Remus A; Galli GM; Vittori J; Kipper M
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():732253. PubMed ID: 34708101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does group size have an impact on welfare indicators in fattening pigs?
Meyer-Hamme SE; Lambertz C; Gauly M
Animal; 2016 Jan; 10(1):142-9. PubMed ID: 26304017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.
Nguyen TT; Doreau M; Eugène M; Corson MS; Garcia-Launay F; Chesneau G; van der Werf HM
Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):860-9. PubMed ID: 23190866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
