201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27898927)
21. Environmental impact of heavy pig production in a sample of Italian farms. A cradle to farm-gate analysis.
Pirlo G; Carè S; Casa GD; Marchetti R; Ponzoni G; Faeti V; Fantin V; Masoni P; Buttol P; Zerbinatti L; Falconi F
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Sep; 565():576-585. PubMed ID: 27203518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The potential ability of swine nutrition to influence environmental factors positively.
Petersen ST
J Anim Sci; 2010 Apr; 88(13 Suppl):E95-E101. PubMed ID: 19897627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Amino Acid Supplementation to Reduce Environmental Impacts of Broiler and Pig Production: A Review.
Cappelaere L; Le Cour Grandmaison J; Martin N; Lambert W
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():689259. PubMed ID: 34381834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of farming strategies on environmental impact of intensive dairy farms in Italy.
Guerci M; Bava L; Zucali M; Sandrucci A; Penati C; Tamburini A
J Dairy Res; 2013 Aug; 80(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 23806128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products--are the differences captured by life cycle assessment?
Meier MS; Stoessel F; Jungbluth N; Juraske R; Schader C; Stolze M
J Environ Manage; 2015 Feb; 149():193-208. PubMed ID: 25463583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nonsolar energy use and one-hundred-year global warming potential of Iowa swine feedstuffs and feeding strategies.
Lammers PJ; Kenealy MD; Kliebenstein JB; Harmon JD; Helmers MJ; Honeyman MS
J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):1204-12. PubMed ID: 19966156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Economic and environmental assessments of combined genetics and nutrition optimization strategies to improve the efficiency of sustainable pork production.
Soleimani T; Hermesch S; Gilbert H
J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33587146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Environmental impacts of the Japanese beef-fattening system with different feeding lengths as evaluated by a life-cycle assessment method.
Ogino A; Kaku K; Osada T; Shimada K
J Anim Sci; 2004 Jul; 82(7):2115-22. PubMed ID: 15309959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Life cycle assessment of alternative swine management practices.
Bandekar PA; Leh M; Bautista R; Matlock MD; Thoma G; Ulrich R
J Anim Sci; 2019 Jan; 97(1):472-484. PubMed ID: 30395291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of dietary protease on nitrogen emissions from broiler production: a holistic comparison using Life Cycle Assessment.
Leinonen I; Williams AG
J Sci Food Agric; 2015 Dec; 95(15):3041-6. PubMed ID: 25857285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of Protease Addition and Replacement of Soybean Meal by Corn Gluten Meal on the Growth of Broilers and on the Environmental Performances of a Broiler Production System in Greece.
Giannenas I; Bonos E; Anestis V; Filioussis G; Papanastasiou DK; Bartzanas T; Papaioannou N; Tzora A; Skoufos I
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169511. PubMed ID: 28046072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Life cycle assessment of manure management and nutrient recycling from a Chinese pig farm.
Luo Y; Stichnothe H; Schuchardt F; Li G; Huaitalla RM; Xu W
Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jan; 32(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 24293069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Energy use in pig production: an examination of current Iowa systems.
Lammers PJ; Kenealy MD; Kliebenstein JB; Harmon JD; Helmers MJ; Honeyman MS
J Anim Sci; 2012 Mar; 90(3):1056-68. PubMed ID: 22079993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multiobjective formulation is an effective method to reduce environmental impacts of livestock feeds.
Garcia-Launay F; Dusart L; Espagnol S; Laisse-Redoux S; Gaudré D; Méda B; Wilfart A
Br J Nutr; 2018 Dec; 120(11):1298-1309. PubMed ID: 30378514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a food-production system in Spain: Iberian ham based on an extensive system.
Lamnatou C; Ezcurra-Ciaurriz X; Chemisana D; Plà-Aragonés LM
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 808():151900. PubMed ID: 34838553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Environmental consequences of processing manure to produce mineral fertilizer and bio-energy.
De Vries JW; Groenestein CM; De Boer IJ
J Environ Manage; 2012 Jul; 102():173-83. PubMed ID: 22459014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: egg production systems.
Leinonen I; Williams AG; Wiseman J; Guy J; Kyriazakis I
Poult Sci; 2012 Jan; 91(1):26-40. PubMed ID: 22184425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimation of cost efficiency of fattening pigs, sows, and piglets using SFA approach analysis: Evidence from China.
Wang G; Zhao C; Shen Y; Yin N
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261240. PubMed ID: 34898638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Anaerobic digestion and milking frequency as mitigation strategies of the environmental burden in the milk production system.
Bacenetti J; Bava L; Zucali M; Lovarelli D; Sandrucci A; Tamburini A; Fiala M
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 539():450-459. PubMed ID: 26383852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems: assessment of feeding and housing.
Temple D; Courboulay V; Manteca X; Velarde A; Dalmau A
Animal; 2012 Apr; 6(4):656-67. PubMed ID: 22436283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
