These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27898927)

  • 61. Nutrient-derived environmental impacts in Chinese agriculture during 1978-2015.
    Wu H; Wang S; Gao L; Zhang L; Yuan Z; Fan T; Wei K; Huang L
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 217():762-774. PubMed ID: 29656257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Factors affecting life cycle assessment of milk produced on 6 Mediterranean buffalo farms.
    Pirlo G; Carè S; Fantin V; Falconi F; Buttol P; Terzano GM; Masoni P; Pacelli C
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6583-93. PubMed ID: 25129494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The impact of daily multiphase feeding on animal performance, body composition, nitrogen and phosphorus excretions, and feed costs in growing-finishing pigs.
    Pomar C; Pomar J; Dubeau F; Joannopoulos E; Dussault JP
    Animal; 2014 May; 8(5):704-13. PubMed ID: 24739349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Anaerobic digestion characteristics of pig manures depending on various growth stages and initial substrate concentrations in a scaled pig farm in Southern China.
    Zhang W; Lang Q; Wu S; Li W; Bah H; Dong R
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Mar; 156():63-9. PubMed ID: 24486939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Towards a methodology to formulate sustainable diets for livestock: accounting for environmental impact in diet formulation.
    Mackenzie SG; Leinonen I; Ferguson N; Kyriazakis I
    Br J Nutr; 2016 May; 115(10):1860-74. PubMed ID: 26987378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Choosing co-substrates to supplement biogas production from animal slurry--a life cycle assessment of the environmental consequences.
    Croxatto Vega GC; ten Hoeve M; Birkved M; Sommer SG; Bruun S
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Nov; 171():410-20. PubMed ID: 25226057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Analysis of factors to predict piglet body weight at the end of the nursery phase.
    Paredes SP; Jansman AJ; Verstegen MW; Awati A; Buist W; den Hartog LA; Van Hees HM; Quiniou N; Hendriks WH; Gerrits WJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Sep; 90(9):3243-51. PubMed ID: 22585823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Daily feeding regimen impacts pig growth and behavior.
    Colpoys JD; Johnson AK; Gabler NK
    Physiol Behav; 2016 May; 159():27-32. PubMed ID: 26957037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Analysis of integrated animal-fish production system under subtropical hill agro ecosystem in India: growth performance of animals, total biomass production and monetary benefit.
    Kumaresan A; Pathak KA; Bujarbaruah KM; Vinod K
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2009 Mar; 41(3):385-91. PubMed ID: 18622714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A stochastic bio-economic pig farm model to assess the impact of innovations on farm performance.
    Ali BM; Berentsen PBM; Bastiaansen JWM; Oude Lansink A
    Animal; 2018 Apr; 12(4):819-830. PubMed ID: 29022521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Effect of production quotas on economic and environmental values of growth rate and feed efficiency in sea cage fish farming.
    Besson M; de Boer IJ; Vandeputte M; van Arendonk JA; Quillet E; Komen H; Aubin J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173131. PubMed ID: 28288179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Influence of dietary fat source and feeding duration on finishing pig growth performance, carcass composition, and fat quality.
    Stephenson EW; Vaughn MA; Burnett DD; Paulk CB; Tokach MD; Dritz SS; DeRouchey JM; Goodband RD; Woodworth JC; Gonzalez JM
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):2851-66. PubMed ID: 27482672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The environmental performance of different pork production scenarios: a life cycle assessment study.
    Villavicencio-Gutiérrez MR; Rogers-Montoya NA; Martínez-Campos R; Gómez-Tenorio G; Martínez-Castañeda FE
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2022 Jan; 54(1):44. PubMed ID: 35015158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Environmental implications of anaerobic digestion for manure management in dairy farms in Mexico: a life cycle perspective.
    Rivas-García P; Botello-Álvarez JE; Abel Seabra JE; da Silva Walter AC; Estrada-Baltazar A
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(17):2198-209. PubMed ID: 25732709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Development of sustainable precision farming systems for swine: estimating real-time individual amino acid requirements in growing-finishing pigs.
    Hauschild L; Lovatto PA; Pomar J; Pomar C
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Jul; 90(7):2255-63. PubMed ID: 22287679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Production: Insights From a Systematic Review.
    Andretta I; Hickmann FMW; Remus A; Franceschi CH; Mariani AB; Orso C; Kipper M; Létourneau-Montminy MP; Pomar C
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():750733. PubMed ID: 34778435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Life cycle assessment of cheese production process in a small-sized dairy industry in Brazil.
    Santos HC; Maranduba HL; de Almeida Neto JA; Rodrigues LB
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Feb; 24(4):3470-3482. PubMed ID: 27873115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Validation of a New Resource-Efficient Feeding System for Fattening Pigs Using Increased Crude Fiber Concentrations in Diets: Feed Intake and Ammonia Emissions.
    Lengling A; Reckels B; Schwennen C; Hölscher R; Waldmann KH; Visscher C; Büscher W
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 32188133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Evaluating processing temperature and feeding value of extruded-expelled soybean meal on nursery and finishing pig growth performance.
    Webster MJ; Goodband RD; Tokach MD; Nelssen JL; Dritz SS; Woodworth JC; De La Llata M; Said NW
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Aug; 81(8):2032-40. PubMed ID: 12926785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy--a life cycle perspective.
    De Vries JW; Vinken TM; Hamelin L; De Boer IJ
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Dec; 125():239-48. PubMed ID: 23026340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.