BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27898935)

  • 1. Estimation of genetic parameters for traits associated with reproduction, lactation, and efficiency in sows.
    Thekkoot DM; Kemp RA; Rothschild MF; Plastow GS; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Nov; 94(11):4516-4529. PubMed ID: 27898935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlated responses in sow appetite, residual feed intake, body composition, and reproduction after divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.
    Gilbert H; Bidanel JP; Billon Y; Lagant H; Guillouet P; Sellier P; Noblet J; Hermesch S
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Apr; 90(4):1097-108. PubMed ID: 22100596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic parameters and predicted selection results for maternal traits related to lactation efficiency in sows.
    Bergsma R; Kanis E; Verstegen MW; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1067-80. PubMed ID: 18192550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomewide association analysis of sow lactation performance traits in lines of Yorkshire pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake during grow-finish phase.
    Thekkoot DM; Young JM; Rothschild MF; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jun; 94(6):2317-31. PubMed ID: 27285909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic parameters of sow feed efficiency during lactation and its underlying traits in a Duroc population.
    Piles M; Martí J; Reixach J; Sánchez JP
    Animal; 2020 May; 14(5):889-898. PubMed ID: 31760967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sows with high milk production had both a high feed intake and high body mobilization.
    Strathe AV; Bruun TS; Hansen CF
    Animal; 2017 Nov; 11(11):1913-1921. PubMed ID: 28196552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic relationships between boar feed efficiency and sow piglet production, body condition score, and stayability in Norwegian Landrace pigs.
    Martinsen KH; Ødegård J; Aasmundstad T; Olsen D; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Aug; 94(8):3159-3168. PubMed ID: 27695777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can a super sow be a robust sow? Consequences of litter investment in purebred and crossbred sows of different parities.
    Ocepek M; Andersen-Ranberg I; Edwards SA; Fredriksen B; Framstad T; Andersen IL
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Aug; 94(8):3550-3560. PubMed ID: 27695774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection for residual feed intake in growing pigs: effects on sow performance in a tropical climate.
    Renaudeau D; Gourdine JL; Fleury J; Ferchaud S; Billon Y; Noblet J; Gilbert H
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3568-79. PubMed ID: 24987064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of sow longevity and trait associations with sow longevity.
    Serenius T; Stalder KJ; Baas TJ; Mabry JW; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Robison OW; Tokach M; Miller RK
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2590-5. PubMed ID: 16908665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic correlations between lactation performance and growing-finishing traits in pigs.
    Bergsma R; Mathur PK; Kanis E; Verstegen MW; Knol EF; Van Arendonk JA
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3601-11. PubMed ID: 23881682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of initial breeding weight and management system using a high-producing sow genotype on resulting reproductive performance over three parities.
    Newton EA; Mahan DC
    J Anim Sci; 1993 May; 71(5):1177-86. PubMed ID: 8505251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of genetic parameters for litter size in Canadian Yorkshire and Landrace swine with each parity of farrowing treated as a different trait.
    Roehe R; Kennedy BW
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Oct; 73(10):2959-70. PubMed ID: 8617666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Threshold-linear estimation of genetic parameters for farrowing mortality, litter size, and test performance of Large White sows.
    Arango J; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Culbertson M; Herring W
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Mar; 83(3):499-506. PubMed ID: 15705745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of nutrient intake in lactation on sow performance: determining the threonine requirement of the high-producing lactating sow.
    Cooper DR; Patience JF; Zijlstra RT; Rademacher M
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Sep; 79(9):2378-87. PubMed ID: 11583424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of feed efficiency within and across lactation in dairy cows and the effect of genetic selection.
    Hurley AM; Lopez-Villalobos N; McParland S; Lewis E; Kennedy E; O'Donovan M; Burke JL; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Feb; 101(2):1267-1280. PubMed ID: 29174146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of suckling intensity of primiparous sows on production performance during current and subsequent parities1.
    Guo JY; Sun Y; DeDecker AE; Coffey MT; Kim SW
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Dec; 97(12):4845-4854. PubMed ID: 31678989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of six maternal genetic lines for female productivity measures over four parities.
    Moeller SJ; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Mabry JW; Baas TJ; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jan; 82(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 14753347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of polymorphisms in candidate genes on reproduction traits in Finnish pig populations.
    Sironen AI; Uimari P; Serenius T; Mote B; Rothschild M; Vilkki J
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):821-7. PubMed ID: 19933427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic parameters for haemoglobin levels in sows and piglets as well as sow reproductive performance and piglet survival.
    Hollema BL; Zwiers S; Hermesch S
    Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):688-696. PubMed ID: 31657286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.