530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27898955)
21. Evaluating consumer acceptability of various muscles from the beef chuck and rib.
Kukowski AC; Maddock RJ; Wulf DM
J Anim Sci; 2004 Feb; 82(2):521-5. PubMed ID: 14974551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of varying salt and fat levels on the sensory quality of beef patties.
Tobin BD; O'Sullivan MG; Hamill RM; Kerry JP
Meat Sci; 2012 Aug; 91(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 22445488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Beef customer satisfaction: factors affecting consumer evaluations of calcium chloride-injected top sirloin steaks when given instructions for preparation.
Behrends JM; Goodson KJ; Koohmaraie M; Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Morgan WW; Reagan JO; Gwartney BL; Wise JW; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 2005 Dec; 83(12):2869-75. PubMed ID: 16282626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The variation in the eating quality of beef from different sexes and breed classes cannot be completely explained by carcass measurements.
Bonny SP; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Farmer LJ; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):987-95. PubMed ID: 26750424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Consumer sensory evaluation and chemical composition of beef gluteus medius and triceps brachii steaks from cattle finished on forage or concentrate diets.
Chail A; Legako JF; Pitcher LR; Ward RE; Martini S; MacAdam JW
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1553-1564. PubMed ID: 28464115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Inclusion of Beef Heart in Ground Beef Patties Alters Quality Characteristics and Consumer Acceptability as Assessed by the Application of Electronic Nose and Tongue Technology.
Douglas SL; Bernardez-Morales GM; Nichols BW; Johnson GF; Barahona-Dominguez LS; Jessup AP; Belk AD; Ball JJ; Cho S; Sawyer JT
Foods; 2024 Mar; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 38472924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Consumer impressions of Tender Select beef.
Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Meade MK; Reagan JO; Byrnes BL; Koohmaraie M
J Anim Sci; 2001 Oct; 79(10):2605-14. PubMed ID: 11721839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prediction of beef tenderness and juiciness using consumer and descriptive sensory attributes.
Martinez HA; Miller RK; Kerth C; Wasser BE
Meat Sci; 2023 Nov; 205():109292. PubMed ID: 37611462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Understanding consumer liking of beef using hierarchical cluster analysis and external preference mapping.
Chong FS; O'Sullivan MG; Kerry JP; Moloney AP; Methven L; Gordon AW; Hagan TD; Farmer LJ
J Sci Food Agric; 2020 Jan; 100(1):245-257. PubMed ID: 31512244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative effects of supplementing beef steers with zilpaterol hydrochloride, ractopamine hydrochloride, or no beta agonist on strip loin composition, raw and cooked color properties, shear force, and consumer assessment of steaks aged for fourteen or twenty-one days postmortem.
Garmyn AJ; Brooks JC; Hodgen JM; Nichols WT; Hutcheson JP; Rathmann RJ; Miller MF
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3670-84. PubMed ID: 24879757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Palatability of beef chuck, loin, and round muscles from three USDA quality grades.
Nyquist KM; O'Quinn TG; Drey LN; Lucherk LW; Brooks JC; Miller MF; Legako JF
J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4276-4292. PubMed ID: 30247687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Characterization of estrogen-trenbolone acetate implants on tenderness and consumer acceptability of beef under the effect of 2 aging times.
Igo JL; Brooks JC; Johnson BJ; Starkey J; Rathmann RJ; Garmyn AJ; Nichols WT; Hutcheson JP; Miller MF
J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):792-7. PubMed ID: 21346138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability of beef stock containing the glutathione-xylose Maillard reaction product and/or monosodium glutamate.
Hong JH; Kwon KY; Kim KO
J Food Sci; 2012 Jun; 77(6):S233-9. PubMed ID: 22591448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of objective measures of beef steak juiciness and their relationships to sensory panel juiciness ratings.
Lucherk LW; O'Quinn TG; Legako JF; Rathmann RJ; Brooks JC; Miller MF
J Anim Sci; 2017 Jun; 95(6):2421-2437. PubMed ID: 28727037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Feeding microalgae meal (All-G Rich; CCAP 4067/2) to beef heifers. II: Effects on ground beef color and palatability.
Phelps KJ; Drouillard JS; O'Quinn TG; Burnett DD; Blackmon TL; Axman JE; Van Bibber-Krueger CL; Gonzalez JM
J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):4030-4039. PubMed ID: 27898910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Legume finishing provides beef with positive human dietary fatty acid ratios and consumer preference comparable with grain-finished beef.
Chail A; Legako JF; Pitcher LR; Griggs TC; Ward RE; Martini S; MacAdam JW
J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):2184-97. PubMed ID: 27285714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Grilling temperature effects on tenderness, juiciness, flavor and volatile aroma compounds of aged ribeye, strip loin, and top sirloin steaks.
Wall KR; Kerth CR; Miller RK; Alvarado C
Meat Sci; 2019 Apr; 150():141-148. PubMed ID: 30473394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Consumer assessment of beef palatability from four beef muscles from USDA Choice and Select graded carcasses.
Hunt MR; Garmyn AJ; O'Quinn TG; Corbin CH; Legako JF; Rathmann RJ; Brooks JC; Miller MF
Meat Sci; 2014 Sep; 98(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24807188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of palatability and muscle composition of novel value-added beef cuts.
Yeh Y; Omaye ST; Ribeiro FA; Calkins CR; de Mello AS
Meat Sci; 2018 Jan; 135():79-83. PubMed ID: 28942340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Beef flavor: a review from chemistry to consumer.
Kerth CR; Miller RK
J Sci Food Agric; 2015 Nov; 95(14):2783-98. PubMed ID: 25857365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
