These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27898955)

  • 61. Consumer palatability scores and volatile beef flavor compounds of five USDA quality grades and four muscles.
    Legako JF; Brooks JC; O'Quinn TG; Hagan TD; Polkinghorne R; Farmer LJ; Miller MF
    Meat Sci; 2015 Feb; 100():291-300. PubMed ID: 25460139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios.
    Beriain MJ; Sánchez M; Carr TR
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3392-402. PubMed ID: 19542506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Profiling the novel plant-based meat alternative category: Consumer affective and sensory response in the context of perceived similarity to meat.
    Giezenaar C; Orr RE; Godfrey AJR; Maggs R; Foster M; Hort J
    Food Res Int; 2024 Jul; 188():114465. PubMed ID: 38823862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Effects of repetitive use of hormonal implants on beef carcass quality, tenderness, and consumer ratings of beef palatability.
    Platter WJ; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Scanga JA; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Apr; 81(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 12723088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Effects of enrichment with polyunsaturated fatty acids (omega-3 and conjugated linoleic acid) on consumer liking of beef aged for 7 or 21 d evaluated at different locations.
    Pérez-Juan M; Realini CE; Barahona M; Sarriés MV; del Mar Campo M; Beriain MJ; Vitale M; Gil M; Albertí P
    J Food Sci; 2014 Nov; 79(11):S2377-82. PubMed ID: 25307945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Enhancement technology improves palatability of normal and callipyge lambs.
    Everts AK; Wulf DM; Wheeler TL; Everts AJ; Weaver AD; Daniel JA
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Dec; 88(12):4026-36. PubMed ID: 20675603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Consumer evaluation of palatability characteristics of a beef value-added cut compared to common retail cuts.
    Lepper-Blilie AN; Berg EP; Germolus AJ; Buchanan DS; Berg PT
    Meat Sci; 2014 Jan; 96(1):419-22. PubMed ID: 23988667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Effects of growth implants on consumer perceptions of meat tenderness in beef steers.
    Barham BL; Brooks JC; Blanton JR; Herring AD; Carr MA; Kerth CR; Miller MF
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Dec; 81(12):3052-6. PubMed ID: 14677861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Visual color and doneness indicators and the incidence of premature brown color in beef patties cooked to four end point temperatures.
    Lyon BG; Berry BW; Soderberg D; Clinch N
    J Food Prot; 2000 Oct; 63(10):1389-98. PubMed ID: 11041139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Beef customer satisfaction: cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top round steak.
    Neely TR; Lorenzen CL; Miller RK; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Taylor JF; Buyck MJ; Reagan JO; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Mar; 77(3):653-60. PubMed ID: 10229361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Beef assessments using functional magnetic resonance imaging and sensory evaluation.
    Tapp WN; Davis TH; Paniukov D; Brooks JC; Brashears MM; Miller MF
    Meat Sci; 2017 Apr; 126():11-17. PubMed ID: 27984700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Acid phosphatase activity and color changes in consumer-style griddle-cooked ground beef patties.
    Lyon BG; Davis CE; Windham WR; Lyon CE
    J Food Prot; 2001 Aug; 64(8):1199-205. PubMed ID: 11510660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Impact of the content and size of NaCl on dynamic sensory profile and instrumental texture of beef burgers.
    Rios-Mera JD; Saldaña E; Cruzado-Bravo MLM; Martins MM; Patinho I; Selani MM; Valentin D; Contreras-Castillo CJ
    Meat Sci; 2020 Mar; 161():107992. PubMed ID: 31704475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Residual triose phosphate isomerase activity and color measurements to determine adequate cooking of ground beef patties.
    Sair AI; Booren AM; Berry BW; Smith DM
    J Food Prot; 1999 Feb; 62(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 10030635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Use of electrical stimulation, hot processing and carrageenan for processing low-fat ground beef patties.
    Berry BW; Joseph RL; Stanfield MS
    Meat Sci; 1996; 42(1):111-23. PubMed ID: 22060306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Consumer sensory evaluation, fatty acid composition, and shelf-life of ground beef with subcutaneous fat trimmings from different carcass locations.
    Kerth CR; Harbison AL; Smith SB; Miller RK
    Meat Sci; 2015 Jun; 104():30-6. PubMed ID: 25688688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Effect of age on sensory perception of beef patties with varying firmness.
    Mena B; Hutchings SC; Ha M; Ashman Dec H; Shand PJ; Warner RD
    Meat Sci; 2022 Oct; 192():108869. PubMed ID: 35696733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Estimation of relationships between mineral concentration and fatty acid composition of longissimus muscle and beef palatability traits.
    Garmyn AJ; Hilton GG; Mateescu RG; Morgan JB; Reecy JM; Tait RG; Beitz DC; Duan Q; Schoonmaker JP; Mayes MS; Drewnoski ME; Liu Q; VanOverbeke DL
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Sep; 89(9):2849-58. PubMed ID: 21512113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Consumer Acceptance, Emotional Response, and Purchase Intent of Rib-Eye Steaks from Grass-Fed Steers, and Effects of Health Benefit Information on Consumer Perception.
    Carabante KM; Ardoin R; Scaglia G; Malekian F; Khachaturyan M; Janes ME; Prinyawiwatkul W
    J Food Sci; 2018 Oct; 83(10):2560-2570. PubMed ID: 30184253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Comparison of tenderness, palatability, and retail caselife of enhanced cow subprimals with nonenhanced cow and United States Department of Agriculture Select subprimals.
    Rose MN; Garmyn AJ; Hilton GG; Morgan JB; VanOverbeke DL
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Nov; 88(11):3683-92. PubMed ID: 20656978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.