130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27899041)
1. Electromagnetic and Electrohydraulic Shock Wave Lithotripsy-Induced Urothelial Damage: Is There a Difference?
Mustafa M; Aburas H; Helo FM; Qarawi L
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):180-184. PubMed ID: 27899041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urine cytology to evaluate urinary urothelial damage of shock-wave lithotripsy.
Mustafa M; Pancaroglu K
Urol Res; 2011 Jun; 39(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 21063696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Cytological evaluation of urothelial damage in extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy].
Grabsky AM; Manukyan EV; Muradyan AA
Urologiia; 2016 Nov; (5):4-9. PubMed ID: 28248012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of MPL 9000 and Lithostar Modularis shockwave lithotriptors: treatment results of 263 children.
Aksoy Y; Ziypak T; Yapanoglu T
Urol Res; 2009 Apr; 37(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19277624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with subcapsular hematoma formation following electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy.
Dhar NB; Thornton J; Karafa MT; Streem SB
J Urol; 2004 Dec; 172(6 Pt 1):2271-4. PubMed ID: 15538247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective randomized comparative study of the effectiveness and safety of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptors.
Sheir KZ; Madbouly K; Elsobky E
J Urol; 2003 Aug; 170(2 Pt 1):389-92. PubMed ID: 12853782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hospital admission for treatment of complications after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones: a study of risk factors.
El-Nahas AR; Taha DE; Elsaadany MM; Zahran MH; Hassan M; Sheir KZ
Urolithiasis; 2018 Jun; 46(3):291-296. PubMed ID: 28555349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In situ SWL of ureteral stones: comparison between an electrohydraulic and an electromagnetic shockwave source.
Tailly GG
J Endourol; 2002 May; 16(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 12042101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Routine Antibiotic Prophylaxis Is Not Required for Patients Undergoing Shockwave Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a National Shockwave Lithotripsy Database in New Zealand.
Alexander CE; Gowland S; Cadwallader J; Hopkins D; Reynard JM; Turney BW
J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1233-1238. PubMed ID: 27700145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new optical coupling control technique and application in SWL.
Lv JL
Urolithiasis; 2016 Nov; 44(6):539-544. PubMed ID: 27025864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of intermediate- and low-frequency shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric kidney stones.
Kaygısız O; Kılıçarslan H; Mert A; Coşkun B; Kordan Y
Urolithiasis; 2018 Aug; 46(4):391-395. PubMed ID: 28756458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of conventional and step-wise shockwave lithotripsy in management of urinary calculi.
Demirci D; Sofikerim M; Yalçin E; Ekmekçioğlu O; Gülmez I; Karacagil M
J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1407-10. PubMed ID: 18044996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the impact of shock wave lithotripsy on kidneys using a new marker: how do neutrophil gelatinese-associated lypocalin values change after shock wave lithotripsy?
Zekey F; Senkul T; Ates F; Soydan H; Yilmaz O; Baykal K
Urology; 2012 Aug; 80(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 22503759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.
Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H
J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.
Freton L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Tondut L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Verhoest G; Habonimana É; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K
J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27824261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Characteristic of cytopathological changes in urine after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].
Grabskiĭ AM; Muradian AA; Agaian MA; Fanardzhian SV; Manukian MV; Oganesian RO
Georgian Med News; 2010 Sep; (186):14-8. PubMed ID: 20972269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of shock wave lithotripsy on nitric oxide and malondialdehyde levels in plasma and urine samples.
Aksoy H; Aksoy Y; Turhan H; Keleş S; Ziypak T; Ozbey I
Cell Biochem Funct; 2007; 25(5):533-6. PubMed ID: 16850521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in infants less than 12-month old.
Turna B; Tekin A; Yağmur İ; Nazlı O
Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 26719036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Piezoelectric, electrohydraulic and electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy for lower ureteral stone].
Sun X; Chen C; Wang Y; Yu H
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 37(4):235-7. PubMed ID: 11829829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are there long-term effects of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in paediatric patients?
El-Nahas AR; Awad BA; El-Assmy AM; Abou El-Ghar ME; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; Sheir KZ
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):666-71. PubMed ID: 22924860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
