272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27900119)
1. Validity of the
Paul SS; Tiedemann A; Hassett LM; Ramsay E; Kirkham C; Chagpar S; Sherrington C
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med; 2015; 1(1):e000013. PubMed ID: 27900119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preliminary concurrent validity of the Fitbit-Zip and ActiGraph activity monitors for measuring steps in people with polymyalgia rheumatica.
Chandrasekar A; Hensor EMA; Mackie SL; Backhouse MR; Harris E
Gait Posture; 2018 Mar; 61():339-345. PubMed ID: 29427859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Formative Evaluation of Consumer-Grade Activity Monitors Worn by Older Adults: Test-Retest Reliability and Criterion Validity of Step Counts.
Maganja SA; Clarke DC; Lear SA; Mackey DC
JMIR Form Res; 2020 Aug; 4(8):e16537. PubMed ID: 32651956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of Different Activity Monitors to Count Steps in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting.
Treacy D; Hassett L; Schurr K; Chagpar S; Paul SS; Sherrington C
Phys Ther; 2017 May; 97(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 28339904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and Reliability of Fitbit Flex for Step Count, Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity and Activity Energy Expenditure.
Sushames A; Edwards A; Thompson F; McDermott R; Gebel K
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161224. PubMed ID: 27589592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.
Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Validation Study of the Fitbit One in Daily Life Using Different Time Intervals.
Middelweerd A; VAN DER Ploeg HP; VAN Halteren A; Twisk JWR; Brug J; Te Velde SJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Jun; 49(6):1270-1279. PubMed ID: 28511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE FITBIT FLEX™ AND ACTIGRAPH GT3X+ AT JOGGING AND RUNNING SPEEDS.
Jones D; Crossley K; Dascombe B; Hart HF; Kemp J
Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2018 Aug; 13(5):860-870. PubMed ID: 30276018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population.
Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gallagher R
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 23(14):1476-85. PubMed ID: 26907794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of Fitbit's active minutes as compared with a research-grade accelerometer and self-reported measures.
Brewer W; Swanson BT; Ortiz A
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med; 2017; 3(1):e000254. PubMed ID: 29018543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Fitbit One Physical Activity Tracker in Men With Prostate Cancer: Validation Study.
Van Blarigan EL; Kenfield SA; Tantum L; Cadmus-Bertram LA; Carroll PR; Chan JM
JMIR Cancer; 2017 Apr; 3(1):e5. PubMed ID: 28420602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and validity of two fitness tracker devices in the laboratory and home environment for older community-dwelling people.
Burton E; Hill KD; Lautenschlager NT; Thøgersen-Ntoumani C; Lewin G; Boyle E; Howie E
BMC Geriatr; 2018 May; 18(1):103. PubMed ID: 29724191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validating the Fitbit Charge 4© wearable activity monitor for use in physical activity interventions.
Waddell A; Birkett S; Broom D; McGregor G; Harwood AE
J Sci Med Sport; 2024 May; 27(5):314-318. PubMed ID: 38350827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physical Activity Monitoring Using a Fitbit Device in Ischemic Stroke Patients: Prospective Cohort Feasibility Study.
Katzan I; Schuster A; Kinzy T
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e14494. PubMed ID: 33464213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review.
Straiton N; Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gullick J; Bhindi R; Gallagher R
Maturitas; 2018 Jun; 112():85-93. PubMed ID: 29704922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and Acceptability of Wearable Devices for Monitoring Step-Count and Activity Minutes Among People With Multiple Sclerosis.
Lavelle G; Norris M; Flemming J; Harper J; Bradley J; Johnston H; Fortune J; Stennett A; Kilbride C; Ryan JM
Front Rehabil Sci; 2021; 2():737384. PubMed ID: 36188762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Wrist-Worn Fitbit Charge 2 and the Waist-Worn Actigraph GTX3 for Measuring Steps Taken in Occupational Settings.
Garza JL; Wu ZH; Singh M; Cherniack MG
Ann Work Expo Health; 2022 Feb; 66(2):281-284. PubMed ID: 34383020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low-Cost Consumer-Based Trackers to Measure Physical Activity and Sleep Duration Among Adults in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Study.
Degroote L; Hamerlinck G; Poels K; Maher C; Crombez G; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Vandendriessche A; Curtis RG; DeSmet A
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 May; 8(5):e16674. PubMed ID: 32282332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
