227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27900585)
1. Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.
Weeks JC; Hasher L
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 27900585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data.
Craik FIM; Eftekhari E; Binns MA
Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1263-1277. PubMed ID: 29934748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Memory encoding of syntactic information involves domain-general attentional resources: Evidence from dual-task studies.
Heyselaar E; Segaert K
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1285-1296. PubMed ID: 30185125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding.
Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2000 Jun; 129(2):155-76. PubMed ID: 10868332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Serial order in word form retrieval: New insights from the auditory picture-word interference task.
Wilshire C; Singh S; Tattersall C
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 26084878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selective attention meets spontaneous recognition memory: Evidence for effects at retrieval.
Moen KC; Miller JK; Lloyd ME
Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():181-189. PubMed ID: 28214768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory.
Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Jan; 24(1):27-47. PubMed ID: 9438952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Divided attention and the encoding effects of retrieval.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2474-2494. PubMed ID: 30975038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An attentional mechanism for minimizing cross-modal distraction.
Grant LD; Weissman DH
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():9-16. PubMed ID: 28126490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interfering with free recall of words: Detrimental effects of phonological competition.
Fernandes MA; Wammes JD; Priselac S; Moscovitch M
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():59-71. PubMed ID: 27174519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of target detection on memory retrieval.
Dong Y; Xiao F; Meng Y; Ye Z; Tang Y
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):838-854. PubMed ID: 38413503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cultural differences in distraction processing: influence of context at retrieval.
Ngo KWJ; Amer T; Man L; Hasher L
Memory; 2018 Nov; 26(10):1396-1401. PubMed ID: 29862880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
Clarke AJ; Butler LT
Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long lasting attentional-context dependent visuomotor memory.
Im HY; Bédard P; Song JH
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1269-74. PubMed ID: 27454139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.
Anderson ND; Craik FI; Naveh-Benjamin M
Psychol Aging; 1998 Sep; 13(3):405-23. PubMed ID: 9793117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction.
Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hughes RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1462-74. PubMed ID: 26191618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Older adults encode more, not less: evidence for age-related attentional broadening.
Weeks JC; Hasher L
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2018 Jul; 25(4):576-587. PubMed ID: 28701077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conditional automaticity: interference effects on the implicit memory retrieval process.
Lin J; Meng Y; Lin W
Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):223-237. PubMed ID: 31302775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reflections of distraction in memory: transfer of previous distraction improves recall in younger and older adults.
Thomas RC; Hasher L
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 21843024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The testing effect under divided attention.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
