These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2790130)

  • 1. On assessing interrater agreement for multiple attribute responses.
    Kupper LL; Hafner KB
    Biometrics; 1989 Sep; 45(3):957-67. PubMed ID: 2790130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing interrater agreement from dependent data.
    Williamson JM; Manatunga AK
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):707-14. PubMed ID: 9192459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quasi-symmetric latent class models, with application to rater agreement.
    Agresti A; Lang JB
    Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 8513099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of interrater agreement with adjustment for covariates.
    Barlow W
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):695-702. PubMed ID: 10766505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous estimation of intrarater and interrater agreement for multiple raters under order restrictions for a binary trait.
    Lester Kirchner H; Lemke JH
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1761-72. PubMed ID: 12111910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing rater agreement using marginal association models.
    Perkins SM; Becker MP
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1743-60. PubMed ID: 12111909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interval estimation under two study designs for kappa with binary classifications.
    Hale CA; Fleiss JL
    Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):523-34. PubMed ID: 8369386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A group sequential procedure for all-pairwise comparisons of k treatments based on the range statistic.
    Liu W
    Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):946-55. PubMed ID: 7548710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Higher-order kappa-type statistics for a dichotomous attribute in multiple ratings.
    Lau T
    Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):535-42. PubMed ID: 8369387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing for marginal independence between two categorical variables with multiple responses.
    Bilder CR; Loughin TM
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 15032795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability analysis for continuous measurements: equivalence test for agreement.
    Yi Q; Wang PP; He Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(15):2816-25. PubMed ID: 17985364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing the homogeneity of kappa statistics.
    Donner A; Eliasziw M; Klar N
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):176-83. PubMed ID: 8934591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The kappa statistic was representative of empirically observed inter-rater agreement for physical findings.
    Gorelick MH; Yen K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):859-61. PubMed ID: 16828681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A repeated measures concordance correlation coefficient.
    King TS; Chinchilli VM; Carrasco JL
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(16):3095-113. PubMed ID: 17216594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Causal nonresponse models for repeated categorical measurements.
    Conaway MR
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):1102-16. PubMed ID: 7786991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing a model of aging in animal experiments.
    Tyurin YuN ; Yakovlev AYu ; Shi J; Bass L
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):363-72. PubMed ID: 7766791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ambiguities and conflicting results: the limitations of the kappa statistic in establishing the interrater reliability of the Irish nursing minimum data set for mental health: a discussion paper.
    Morris R; MacNeela P; Scott A; Treacy P; Hyde A; O'Brien J; Lehwaldt D; Byrne A; Drennan J
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Apr; 45(4):645-7. PubMed ID: 17959177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodology to improve data quality from chart review in the managed care setting.
    Cassidy LD; Marsh GM; Holleran MK; Ruhl LS
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 Sep; 8(9):787-93. PubMed ID: 12234019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Random marginal agreement coefficients: rethinking the adjustment for chance when measuring agreement.
    Fay MP
    Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):171-80. PubMed ID: 15618535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intra- and interrater agreement with cumulative defect curves.
    Chan AB; Chauhan BC; LeBlanc RP; McCormick TA; Shaw AM
    J Glaucoma; 1997 Apr; 6(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 9098820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.