These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27902201)

  • 1. Clarifying the limitations on Rule 18a and Rule 30 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 67(2):505-506. PubMed ID: 27902201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proposed modifications to Rule 40d of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 May; 69(5):1519-1520. PubMed ID: 30777819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clarifying rule 24a of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 58(Pt 7):1779-81. PubMed ID: 18599736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are Rules 20d and 20e of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes superfluous?
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 66(11):4907-4909. PubMed ID: 27528235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 Jan; 69(1A):S1-S111. PubMed ID: 26596770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Updating Rule 15 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 65(8):2766-2768. PubMed ID: 25951862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rule 24b of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and regulating the priority of names and epithets considered to be associated with heterotypic synonyms.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 Dec; 69(12):3980-3983. PubMed ID: 31219419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limiting the retroactive effects of the note to Rule 61 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2016 Sep; 66(9):3619-3621. PubMed ID: 27307285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The undesirable retroactive changes to Rule 8 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 66(11):4895-4896. PubMed ID: 27488867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The wording and examples given in Rule 47a of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes are misleading.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 66(11):4913-4914. PubMed ID: 27553429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Formation of names of genera of prokaryotes that end on -oides or -opsis. A proposal for addenda to Rule 65(2) and Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Oren A; Schink B
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2016 Jun; 66(6):2452-2453. PubMed ID: 27001496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rule 27 of the International Code of Nomenclature of prokaryotes: the basonym is not enough.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 66(11):4897-4899. PubMed ID: 27488906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27 (3) and 30 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. Opinion 81.
    Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 58(Pt 7):1755-63. PubMed ID: 18599730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Introducing the concept of the isonym into the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 May; 69(5):1515-1518. PubMed ID: 30714892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proposal to change Rule 18a, Rule 18f and Rule 30 to limit the retroactive consequences of changes accepted by the ICSB.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Bacteriol; 1999 Jul; 49 Pt 3():1321-2. PubMed ID: 10425797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rule 15 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria: a current source of confusion.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 58(Pt 7):1775-8. PubMed ID: 18599735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legitimacy is an essential concept of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes - a major revision of the Code is called for.
    Young JM
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2009 May; 59(Pt 5):1252-7. PubMed ID: 19406827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are the concepts of legitimate and illegitimate names necessary under the current International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria? A proposal to make changes to the Code.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 58(Pt 8):1979-86. PubMed ID: 18676494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proposal to modify Rule 8 of the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision).
    Euzéby JP
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2007 Jul; 57(Pt 7):1672. PubMed ID: 17625215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implementation of Rule 8 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes for the renaming of classes. Request for an Opinion.
    Oren A; Parte A; Garrity GM
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2016 Oct; 66(10):4296-4298. PubMed ID: 27453056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.