These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27902733)
1. Single-Camera Trap Survey Designs Miss Detections: Impacts on Estimates of Occupancy and Community Metrics. Pease BS; Nielsen CK; Holzmueller EJ PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166689. PubMed ID: 27902733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Camera trap arrays improve detection probability of wildlife: Investigating study design considerations using an empirical dataset. O'Connor KM; Nathan LR; Liberati MR; Tingley MW; Vokoun JC; Rittenhouse TAG PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175684. PubMed ID: 28422973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implications of the scale of detection for inferring co-occurrence patterns from paired camera traps and acoustic recorders. Vélez J; McShea W; Pukazhenthi B; Stevenson P; Fieberg J Conserv Biol; 2024 Jun; 38(3):e14218. PubMed ID: 37937478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of soil eDNA to camera traps for assessing mammal and bird community composition and site use. Tetzlaff SJ; Katz AD; Wolff PJ; Kleitch ME Ecol Evol; 2024 Jul; 14(7):e70022. PubMed ID: 39011132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Applications of camera trap in wildlife population ecology]. Li Q; Wu JG; Kou XJ; Feng LM Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2013 Apr; 24(4):947-55. PubMed ID: 23898650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing arrays of multiple trail cameras to detect North American mammals. Evans BE; Mosby CE; Mortelliti A PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0217543. PubMed ID: 31206527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can camera traps monitor Komodo dragons a large ectothermic predator? Ariefiandy A; Purwandana D; Seno A; Ciofi C; Jessop TS PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58800. PubMed ID: 23527027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Camera trap placement and the potential for bias due to trails and other features. Kolowski JM; Forrester TD PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186679. PubMed ID: 29045478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multi-state occupancy model to non-invasively monitor visible signs of wildlife health with camera traps that accounts for image quality. Murray MH; Fidino M; Lehrer EW; Simonis JL; Magle SB J Anim Ecol; 2021 Aug; 90(8):1973-1984. PubMed ID: 33942308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recommended survey designs for occupancy modelling using motion-activated cameras: insights from empirical wildlife data. Shannon G; Lewis JS; Gerber BD PeerJ; 2014; 2():e532. PubMed ID: 25210658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limitations of recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research: a practitioner's perspective. Newey S; Davidson P; Nazir S; Fairhurst G; Verdicchio F; Irvine RJ; van der Wal R Ambio; 2015 Nov; 44 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):624-35. PubMed ID: 26508349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Epizootiologic survey of Mycobacterium bovis in wildlife and farm environments in northern Michigan. Witmer G; Fine AE; Gionfriddo J; Pipas M; Shively K; Piccolo K; Burke P J Wildl Dis; 2010 Apr; 46(2):368-78. PubMed ID: 20688630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mark-recapture and mark-resight methods for estimating abundance with remote cameras: a carnivore case study. Alonso RS; McClintock BT; Lyren LM; Boydston EE; Crooks KR PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0123032. PubMed ID: 25822245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]