These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27902733)

  • 1. Single-Camera Trap Survey Designs Miss Detections: Impacts on Estimates of Occupancy and Community Metrics.
    Pease BS; Nielsen CK; Holzmueller EJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166689. PubMed ID: 27902733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Camera trap arrays improve detection probability of wildlife: Investigating study design considerations using an empirical dataset.
    O'Connor KM; Nathan LR; Liberati MR; Tingley MW; Vokoun JC; Rittenhouse TAG
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175684. PubMed ID: 28422973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implications of the scale of detection for inferring co-occurrence patterns from paired camera traps and acoustic recorders.
    Vélez J; McShea W; Pukazhenthi B; Stevenson P; Fieberg J
    Conserv Biol; 2024 Jun; 38(3):e14218. PubMed ID: 37937478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of soil eDNA to camera traps for assessing mammal and bird community composition and site use.
    Tetzlaff SJ; Katz AD; Wolff PJ; Kleitch ME
    Ecol Evol; 2024 Jul; 14(7):e70022. PubMed ID: 39011132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Applications of camera trap in wildlife population ecology].
    Li Q; Wu JG; Kou XJ; Feng LM
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2013 Apr; 24(4):947-55. PubMed ID: 23898650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing arrays of multiple trail cameras to detect North American mammals.
    Evans BE; Mosby CE; Mortelliti A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0217543. PubMed ID: 31206527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can camera traps monitor Komodo dragons a large ectothermic predator?
    Ariefiandy A; Purwandana D; Seno A; Ciofi C; Jessop TS
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58800. PubMed ID: 23527027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Camera trap placement and the potential for bias due to trails and other features.
    Kolowski JM; Forrester TD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186679. PubMed ID: 29045478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multi-state occupancy model to non-invasively monitor visible signs of wildlife health with camera traps that accounts for image quality.
    Murray MH; Fidino M; Lehrer EW; Simonis JL; Magle SB
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Aug; 90(8):1973-1984. PubMed ID: 33942308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grizzly Bear Noninvasive Genetic Tagging Surveys: Estimating the Magnitude of Missed Detections.
    Fisher JT; Heim N; Code S; Paczkowski J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161055. PubMed ID: 27603134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recommended survey designs for occupancy modelling using motion-activated cameras: insights from empirical wildlife data.
    Shannon G; Lewis JS; Gerber BD
    PeerJ; 2014; 2():e532. PubMed ID: 25210658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Limitations of recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research: a practitioner's perspective.
    Newey S; Davidson P; Nazir S; Fairhurst G; Verdicchio F; Irvine RJ; van der Wal R
    Ambio; 2015 Nov; 44 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):624-35. PubMed ID: 26508349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epizootiologic survey of Mycobacterium bovis in wildlife and farm environments in northern Michigan.
    Witmer G; Fine AE; Gionfriddo J; Pipas M; Shively K; Piccolo K; Burke P
    J Wildl Dis; 2010 Apr; 46(2):368-78. PubMed ID: 20688630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mark-recapture and mark-resight methods for estimating abundance with remote cameras: a carnivore case study.
    Alonso RS; McClintock BT; Lyren LM; Boydston EE; Crooks KR
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0123032. PubMed ID: 25822245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. White-tailed deer detection rates increase when coyotes are present.
    Clipp HL; Pesi SM; Miller ML; Gigliotti LC; Skelly BP; Rota CT
    Ecol Evol; 2024 Mar; 14(3):e11149. PubMed ID: 38500852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human disturbance and shifts in vertebrate community composition in a biodiversity hotspot.
    Vargas Soto JS; Beirne C; Whitworth A; Cruz Diaz JC; Flatt E; Pillco-Huarcaya R; Olson ER; Azofeifa A; Saborío-R G; Salom-Pérez R; Espinoza-Muñoz D; Hay L; Whittaker L; Roldán C; Bedoya-Arrieta R; Broadbent EN; Molnár PK
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Apr; 36(2):e13813. PubMed ID: 34342042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New records of the critically endangered Ecuadorian white-fronted capuchin (Cebus aequatorialis) detected by remote cameras.
    Guerrero-Casado J; Cedeño RI; Johnston JC; Gunther MS
    Primates; 2020 Mar; 61(2):175-179. PubMed ID: 31915955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatiotemporal distributions of mammals occurring in an agro-prairie ecosystem.
    Palomo-Munoz G; Werdel TJ; Piper CW; Peek MS; Ricketts AM; Ahlers AA
    Ecology; 2023 Mar; 104(3):e3945. PubMed ID: 36478344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SNAPSHOT USA 2019: a coordinated national camera trap survey of the United States.
    Cove MV; Kays R; Bontrager H; Bresnan C; Lasky M; Frerichs T; Klann R; Lee TE; Crockett SC; Crupi AP; Weiss KCB; Rowe H; Sprague T; Schipper J; Tellez C; Lepczyk CA; Fantle-Lepczyk JE; LaPoint S; Williamson J; Fisher-Reid MC; King SM; Bebko AJ; Chrysafis P; Jensen AJ; Jachowski DS; Sands J; MacCombie KA; Herrera DJ; van der Merwe M; Knowles TW; Horan RV; Rentz MS; Brandt LSE; Nagy C; Barton BT; Thompson WC; Maher SP; Darracq AK; Hess G; Parsons AW; Wells B; Roemer GW; Hernandez CJ; Gompper ME; Webb SL; Vanek JP; Lafferty DJR; Bergquist AM; Hubbard T; Forrester T; Clark D; Cincotta C; Favreau J; Facka AN; Halbur M; Hammerich S; Gray M; Rega-Brodsky CC; Durbin C; Flaherty EA; Brooke JM; Coster SS; Lathrop RG; Russell K; Bogan DA; Cliché R; Shamon H; Hawkins MTR; Marks SB; Lonsinger RC; O'Mara MT; Compton JA; Fowler M; Barthelmess EL; Andy KE; Belant JL; Beyer DE; Kautz TM; Scognamillo DG; Schalk CM; Leslie MS; Nasrallah SL; Ellison CN; Ruthven C; Fritts S; Tleimat J; Gay M; Whittier CA; Neiswenter SA; Pelletier R; DeGregorio BA; Kuprewicz EK; Davis ML; Dykstra A; Mason DS; Baruzzi C; Lashley MA; Risch DR; Price MR; Allen ML; Whipple LS; Sperry JH; Hagen RH; Mortelliti A; Evans BE; Studds CE; Sirén APK; Kilborn J; Sutherland C; Warren P; Fuller T; Harris NC; Carter NH; Trout E; Zimova M; Giery ST; Iannarilli F; Higdon SD; Revord RS; Hansen CP; Millspaugh JJ; Zorn A; Benson JF; Wehr NH; Solberg JN; Gerber BD; Burr JC; Sevin J; Green AM; Şekercioğlu ÇH; Pendergast M; Barnick KA; Edelman AJ; Wasdin JR; Romero A; O'Neill BJ; Schmitz N; Alston JM; Kuhn KM; Lesmeister DB; Linnell MA; Appel CL; Rota C; Stenglein JL; Anhalt-Depies C; Nelson C; Long RA; Jo Jaspers K; Remine KR; Jordan MJ; Davis D; Hernández-Yáñez H; Zhao JY; McShea WJ
    Ecology; 2021 Jun; 102(6):e03353. PubMed ID: 33793977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating the intensity of use by interacting predators and prey using camera traps.
    Keim JL; Lele SR; DeWitt PD; Fitzpatrick JJ; Jenni NS
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 May; 88(5):690-701. PubMed ID: 30834526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.