935 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27903464)
1. A peptide-retrieval strategy enables significant improvement of quantitative performance without compromising confidence of identification.
Tu C; Shen S; Sheng Q; Shyr Y; Qu J
J Proteomics; 2017 Jan; 152():276-282. PubMed ID: 27903464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved LC-MS/MS spectral counting statistics by recovering low-scoring spectra matched to confidently identified peptide sequences.
Zhou JY; Schepmoes AA; Zhang X; Moore RJ; Monroe ME; Lee JH; Camp DG; Smith RD; Qian WJ
J Proteome Res; 2010 Nov; 9(11):5698-704. PubMed ID: 20812748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Targeted Feature Detection for Data-Dependent Shotgun Proteomics.
Weisser H; Choudhary JS
J Proteome Res; 2017 Aug; 16(8):2964-2974. PubMed ID: 28673088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of Search Engines and Postprocessing Approaches to Maximize Peptide and Protein Identification for High-Resolution Mass Data.
Tu C; Sheng Q; Li J; Ma D; Shen X; Wang X; Shyr Y; Yi Z; Qu J
J Proteome Res; 2015 Nov; 14(11):4662-73. PubMed ID: 26390080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An IonStar Experimental Strategy for MS1 Ion Current-Based Quantification Using Ultrahigh-Field Orbitrap: Reproducible, In-Depth, and Accurate Protein Measurement in Large Cohorts.
Shen X; Shen S; Li J; Hu Q; Nie L; Tu C; Wang X; Orsburn B; Wang J; Qu J
J Proteome Res; 2017 Jul; 16(7):2445-2456. PubMed ID: 28412812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of the resolution limitations of peptide identification algorithms.
Colaert N; Degroeve S; Helsens K; Martens L
J Proteome Res; 2011 Dec; 10(12):5555-61. PubMed ID: 21995378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-dimensional target decoy strategy for shotgun proteomics.
Bern MW; Kil YJ
J Proteome Res; 2011 Dec; 10(12):5296-301. PubMed ID: 22010998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical multidimensional space for scoring peptide spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics.
Ivanov MV; Levitsky LI; Lobas AA; Panic T; Laskay ÜA; Mitulovic G; Schmid R; Pridatchenko ML; Tsybin YO; Gorshkov MV
J Proteome Res; 2014 Apr; 13(4):1911-20. PubMed ID: 24571493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of strategies for obtaining confident identifications in bottom-up proteomics measurements using hybrid FTMS instruments.
Tolmachev AV; Monroe ME; Purvine SO; Moore RJ; Jaitly N; Adkins JN; Anderson GA; Smith RD
Anal Chem; 2008 Nov; 80(22):8514-25. PubMed ID: 18855412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhanced peptide quantification using spectral count clustering and cluster abundance.
Lee S; Kwon MS; Lee HJ; Paik YK; Tang H; Lee JK; Park T
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Oct; 12():423. PubMed ID: 22034872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The APEX Quantitative Proteomics Tool: generating protein quantitation estimates from LC-MS/MS proteomics results.
Braisted JC; Kuntumalla S; Vogel C; Marcotte EM; Rodrigues AR; Wang R; Huang ST; Ferlanti ES; Saeed AI; Fleischmann RD; Peterson SN; Pieper R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():529. PubMed ID: 19068132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combination of Multiple Spectral Libraries Improves the Current Search Methods Used to Identify Missing Proteins in the Chromosome-Centric Human Proteome Project.
Cho JY; Lee HJ; Jeong SK; Kim KY; Kwon KH; Yoo JS; Omenn GS; Baker MS; Hancock WS; Paik YK
J Proteome Res; 2015 Dec; 14(12):4959-66. PubMed ID: 26330117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving sensitivity in proteome studies by analysis of false discovery rates for multiple search engines.
Jones AR; Siepen JA; Hubbard SJ; Paton NW
Proteomics; 2009 Mar; 9(5):1220-9. PubMed ID: 19253293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultra-High-Resolution IonStar Strategy Enhancing Accuracy and Precision of MS1-Based Proteomics and an Extensive Comparison with State-of-the-Art SWATH-MS in Large-Cohort Quantification.
Wang X; Jin L; Hu C; Shen S; Qian S; Ma M; Zhu X; Li F; Wang J; Tian Y; Qu J
Anal Chem; 2021 Mar; 93(11):4884-4893. PubMed ID: 33687211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Scalable Approach for Protein False Discovery Rate Estimation in Large Proteomic Data Sets.
Savitski MM; Wilhelm M; Hahne H; Kuster B; Bantscheff M
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2015 Sep; 14(9):2394-404. PubMed ID: 25987413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In-depth analysis of protein inference algorithms using multiple search engines and well-defined metrics.
Audain E; Uszkoreit J; Sachsenberg T; Pfeuffer J; Liang X; Hermjakob H; Sanchez A; Eisenacher M; Reinert K; Tabb DL; Kohlbacher O; Perez-Riverol Y
J Proteomics; 2017 Jan; 150():170-182. PubMed ID: 27498275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Search and decoy: the automatic identification of mass spectra.
Eisenacher M; Kohl M; Turewicz M; Koch MH; Uszkoreit J; Stephan C
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 893():445-88. PubMed ID: 22665317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental Null Method to Guide the Development of Technical Procedures and to Control False-Positive Discovery in Quantitative Proteomics.
Shen X; Hu Q; Li J; Wang J; Qu J
J Proteome Res; 2015 Oct; 14(10):4147-57. PubMed ID: 26051676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SuperQuant: A Data Processing Approach to Increase Quantitative Proteome Coverage.
Gorshkov V; Verano-Braga T; Kjeldsen F
Anal Chem; 2015 Jun; 87(12):6319-27. PubMed ID: 25978296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SWATH enables precise label-free quantification on proteome scale.
Huang Q; Yang L; Luo J; Guo L; Wang Z; Yang X; Jin W; Fang Y; Ye J; Shan B; Zhang Y
Proteomics; 2015 Apr; 15(7):1215-23. PubMed ID: 25560523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
