691 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27903644)
1. A reference data set of 5.4 million phased human variants validated by genetic inheritance from sequencing a three-generation 17-member pedigree.
Eberle MA; Fritzilas E; Krusche P; Källberg M; Moore BL; Bekritsky MA; Iqbal Z; Chuang HY; Humphray SJ; Halpern AL; Kruglyak S; Margulies EH; McVean G; Bentley DR
Genome Res; 2017 Jan; 27(1):157-164. PubMed ID: 27903644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimized detection of insertions/deletions (INDELs) in whole-exome sequencing data.
Kim BY; Park JH; Jo HY; Koo SK; Park MH
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182272. PubMed ID: 28792971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants.
Belkadi A; Bolze A; Itan Y; Cobat A; Vincent QB; Antipenko A; Shang L; Boisson B; Casanova JL; Abel L
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(17):5473-8. PubMed ID: 25827230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of pathogenic variants from the ClinVar database in healthy people using next-generation sequencing.
Rančelis T; Arasimavičius J; Ambrozaitytė L; Kavaliauskienė I; Domarkienė I; Karčiauskaitė D; Kučinskienė ZA; Kučinskas V
Genet Res (Camb); 2017 Aug; 99():e6. PubMed ID: 28851476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. mInDel: a high-throughput and efficient pipeline for genome-wide InDel marker development.
Lv Y; Liu Y; Zhao H
BMC Genomics; 2016 Apr; 17():290. PubMed ID: 27079510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison and evaluation of two exome capture kits and sequencing platforms for variant calling.
Zhang G; Wang J; Yang J; Li W; Deng Y; Li J; Huang J; Hu S; Zhang B
BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):581. PubMed ID: 26242175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tool evaluation for the detection of variably sized indels from next generation whole genome and targeted sequencing data.
Wang N; Lysenkov V; Orte K; Kairisto V; Aakko J; Khan S; Elo LL
PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Feb; 18(2):e1009269. PubMed ID: 35176018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance comparison of whole-genome sequencing platforms.
Lam HY; Clark MJ; Chen R; Chen R; Natsoulis G; O'Huallachain M; Dewey FE; Habegger L; Ashley EA; Gerstein MB; Butte AJ; Ji HP; Snyder M
Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Dec; 30(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 22178993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A global reference for human genetic variation.
; Auton A; Brooks LD; Durbin RM; Garrison EP; Kang HM; Korbel JO; Marchini JL; McCarthy S; McVean GA; Abecasis GR
Nature; 2015 Oct; 526(7571):68-74. PubMed ID: 26432245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification of indels in next-generation sequencing data.
Ratan A; Olson TL; Loughran TP; Miller W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):42. PubMed ID: 25879703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance assessment of variant calling pipelines using human whole exome sequencing and simulated data.
Kumaran M; Subramanian U; Devarajan B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):342. PubMed ID: 31208315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of Variant Calling Pipelines Using Genome in a Bottle as a Reference.
Cornish A; Guda C
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():456479. PubMed ID: 26539496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of variant identification methods for whole genome sequencing data in dairy cattle.
Baes CF; Dolezal MA; Koltes JE; Bapst B; Fritz-Waters E; Jansen S; Flury C; Signer-Hasler H; Stricker C; Fernando R; Fries R; Moll J; Garrick DJ; Reecy JM; Gredler B
BMC Genomics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):948. PubMed ID: 25361890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Challenges in exome analysis by LifeScope and its alternative computational pipelines.
Pranckevičiene E; Rančelis T; Pranculis A; Kučinskas V
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():421. PubMed ID: 26346699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. svclassify: a method to establish benchmark structural variant calls.
Parikh H; Mohiyuddin M; Lam HY; Iyer H; Chen D; Pratt M; Bartha G; Spies N; Losert W; Zook JM; Salit M
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():64. PubMed ID: 26772178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precise detection of de novo single nucleotide variants in human genomes.
Gómez-Romero L; Palacios-Flores K; Reyes J; García D; Boege M; Dávila G; Flores M; Schatz MC; Palacios R
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5516-5521. PubMed ID: 29735690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. INDELseek: detection of complex insertions and deletions from next-generation sequencing data.
Au CH; Leung AY; Kwong A; Chan TL; Ma ES
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28056804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Joint variant and de novo mutation identification on pedigrees from high-throughput sequencing data.
Cleary JG; Braithwaite R; Gaastra K; Hilbush BS; Inglis S; Irvine SA; Jackson A; Littin R; Nohzadeh-Malakshah S; Rathod M; Ware D; Trigg L; De La Vega FM
J Comput Biol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):405-19. PubMed ID: 24874280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrating human sequence data sets provides a resource of benchmark SNP and indel genotype calls.
Zook JM; Chapman B; Wang J; Mittelman D; Hofmann O; Hide W; Salit M
Nat Biotechnol; 2014 Mar; 32(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 24531798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Amplicon Indel Hunter Is a Novel Bioinformatics Tool to Detect Large Somatic Insertion/Deletion Mutations in Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
Kadri S; Zhen CJ; Wurst MN; Long BC; Jiang ZF; Wang YL; Furtado LV; Segal JP
J Mol Diagn; 2015 Nov; 17(6):635-43. PubMed ID: 26319364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
