These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Assessment of Online Patient Education Resources. Gulbrandsen TR; Skalitzky MK; Ryan SE; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Brown TS; Elkins JM Iowa Orthop J; 2022; 42(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 36601227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Enhancing Readability of Online Patient-Facing Content: The Role of AI Chatbots in Improving Cancer Information Accessibility. Abreu AA; Murimwa GZ; Farah E; Stewart JW; Zhang L; Rodriguez J; Sweetenham J; Zeh HJ; Wang SC; Polanco PM J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2024 May; 22(2 D):. PubMed ID: 38749478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information. Cheng C; Dunn M Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts. Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Readability of online patient education material for the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a cross-sectional health literacy study. Szmuda T; Özdemir C; Ali S; Singh A; Syed MT; Słoniewski P Public Health; 2020 Aug; 185():21-25. PubMed ID: 32516624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information. Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Voice Disorders. Dueppen AJ; Bellon-Harn ML; Radhakrishnan N; Manchaiah V J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 29254598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer. Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Readability evaluation of Internet-based patient education materials related to the anesthesiology field. De Oliveira GS; Jung M; Mccaffery KJ; McCarthy RJ; Wolf MS J Clin Anesth; 2015 Aug; 27(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 25912728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level. Eltorai AE; Sharma P; Wang J; Daniels AH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1181-6. PubMed ID: 25475715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis. Yurdakul OV; Kilicoglu MS; Bagcier F Arch Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Nov; 65(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 33166440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information. Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Readability assessment of the American Rhinologic Society patient education materials. Kasabwala K; Misra P; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; Baredes S; Setzen M; Eloy JA Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2013 Apr; 3(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 23044857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries. Worrall AP; Connolly MJ; O'Neill A; O'Doherty M; Thornton KP; McNally C; McConkey SJ; de Barra E BMC Public Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1635. PubMed ID: 33183297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patient-targeted websites on overactive bladder: What are our patients reading? Clancy AA; Hickling D; Didomizio L; Sanaee M; Shehata F; Zee R; Khalil H Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Feb; 37(2):832-841. PubMed ID: 28762549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Readability, reliability and credibility of online patient information on skin grafts. Heaven CL; Patel C; Ahmadi O; Mathy JA Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Feb; 64(1):e57-e64. PubMed ID: 36354108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study. Basch CH; Ethan D; MacLean SA; Fera J; Garcia P; Basch CE Am J Mens Health; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1665-1669. PubMed ID: 29888641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]