BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27906775)

  • 1. Improving Liver Allocation Using Optimized Neighborhoods.
    Kilambi V; Mehrotra S
    Transplantation; 2017 Feb; 101(2):350-359. PubMed ID: 27906775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Liver sharing and organ procurement organization performance under redistricted allocation.
    Gentry SE; Chow EK; Massie A; Luo X; Shteyn E; Pyke J; Zaun D; Snyder JJ; Israni AK; Kasiske B; Segev DL
    Liver Transpl; 2015 Aug; 21(8):1031-9. PubMed ID: 25990089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Concentric Neighborhood Solution to Disparity in Liver Access That Contains Current UNOS Districts.
    Mehrotra S; Kilambi V; Bui K; Gilroy R; Alexopoulos SP; Goldberg DS; Ladner DP; Klintmalm GB
    Transplantation; 2018 Feb; 102(2):255-278. PubMed ID: 28885499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Liver sharing and organ procurement organization performance.
    Gentry SE; Chow EK; Massie A; Luo X; Zaun D; Snyder JJ; Israni AK; Kasiske B; Segev DL
    Liver Transpl; 2015 Mar; 21(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 25556648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Addressing geographic disparities in liver transplantation through redistricting.
    Gentry SE; Massie AB; Cheek SW; Lentine KL; Chow EH; Wickliffe CE; Dzebashvili N; Salvalaggio PR; Schnitzler MA; Axelrod DA; Segev DL
    Am J Transplant; 2013 Aug; 13(8):2052-8. PubMed ID: 23837931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Population-Based Analysis and Projections of Liver Supply Under Redistricting.
    Parikh ND; Marrero WJ; Sonnenday CJ; Lok AS; Hutton DW; Lavieri MS
    Transplantation; 2017 Sep; 101(9):2048-2055. PubMed ID: 28945663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.
    Haugen CE; Ishaque T; Sapirstein A; Cauneac A; Segev DL; Gentry S
    Am J Transplant; 2019 Jul; 19(7):2044-2052. PubMed ID: 30748095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement in the Outcomes of MELD ≥ 40 Liver Transplantation: An Analysis of 207 Consecutive Transplants in a Highly Competitive DSA.
    Nekrasov V; Matsuoka L; Kaur N; Pita A; Whang G; Cao S; Groshen S; Alexopoulos S
    Transplantation; 2017 Oct; 101(10):2360-2367. PubMed ID: 28319564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling the allocation system: principles for robust design before restructuring.
    Mehrotra S; Kilambi V; Gilroy R; Ladner DP; Klintmalm GB; Kaplan B
    Transplantation; 2015 Feb; 99(2):278-81. PubMed ID: 25651120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Liver allocation and distribution: time for a change.
    Deshpande R; Hirose R; Mulligan D
    Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2017 Apr; 22(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 28212159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moving past "think local, act global": A perspective on geographic disparity.
    Lynch RJ; Magliocca JF; Hundley JC; Karp SJ
    Am J Transplant; 2019 Jul; 19(7):1907-1911. PubMed ID: 30125467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of broader geographic sharing of donor lungs on lung transplant waitlist outcomes.
    Mooney JJ; Bhattacharya J; Dhillon GS
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2019 Feb; 38(2):136-144. PubMed ID: 30344025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of the Statewide Sharing variance on geographic disparity in kidney transplantation in the United States.
    Davis AE; Mehrotra S; Kilambi V; Kang J; McElroy L; Lapin B; Holl J; Abecassis M; Friedewald JJ; Ladner DP
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2014 Aug; 9(8):1449-60. PubMed ID: 24970871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list: impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes.
    Trotter JF; Osgood MJ
    JAMA; 2004 Apr; 291(15):1871-4. PubMed ID: 15100206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geographic inequity in access to livers for transplantation.
    Yeh H; Smoot E; Schoenfeld DA; Markmann JF
    Transplantation; 2011 Feb; 91(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 21200366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geographic disparities in deceased donor liver transplantation within a single UNOS region.
    Barshes NR; Becker NS; Washburn WK; Halff GA; Aloia TA; Goss JA
    Liver Transpl; 2007 May; 13(5):747-51. PubMed ID: 17457866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraregional model for end-stage liver disease score variation in liver transplantation: Disparity in our own backyard.
    Croome KP; Lee DD; Burns JM; Keaveny AP; Taner CB
    Liver Transpl; 2018 Apr; 24(4):488-496. PubMed ID: 29365357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in Characteristics of Patients Listed for Liver Transplantation Will Lead to Higher Rates of Waitlist Removal Due to Clinical Deterioration.
    Yi Z; Mayorga ME; Orman ES; Wheeler SB; Hayashi PH; Barritt AS
    Transplantation; 2017 Oct; 101(10):2368-2374. PubMed ID: 28858174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transplantation traffic--geography as destiny for transplant candidates.
    Ubel PA
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Dec; 371(26):2450-2. PubMed ID: 25539104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The sickest first? Disparities with model for end-stage liver disease-based organ allocation: one region's experience.
    Schaffer RL; Kulkarni S; Harper A; Millis JM; Cronin DC
    Liver Transpl; 2003 Nov; 9(11):1211-5. PubMed ID: 14586883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.